Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Halloween would be a logical day for a terrorist attack

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 11:49 AM
Original message
Halloween would be a logical day for a terrorist attack
Only two days before the election and they would expect a massive rallying around the pResident and Mothers would especially do so because of their children which I am sure would be the targets considering how much Bush* gained after the Russian School incident. If an October Surprise is to happen expect it on Halloween. They would say it was so people would vote for Kerry because Kerry is the Terrorist's choice. I'm sure they have their news announcments already made up and can get them on the airwaves immediately. I am very worried about something like this and think we should do everything in our power to pre-empt their politicising such an attack if it indeed does occur. Something to the effect of "Proves how much less safe the US is because of Bush* and see they can not protect us and in fact endanger us" Anyone else in a constant state of worry because of these Thugs? My mind is overly active I'm afraid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. There's no logical reason for terrorist to attack before the election.
They want bush out as badly as we do. It's more likely that we'd be attacked Nov. 3rd if bush managed to steal the election again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celeborn Skywalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I disagree
I think the terrorists want *Bush to win. His Iraq quagmire has been their best recruiting tool yet. They're probably excited at the thought of his inevitable invasion of Iran, also. No, the terrorists will be disappointed if Kerry wins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. Well, I disagree with you.
The terrorist recruitment will continue no matter who wins the election, since we will not be leaving Iraq any time soon. Given that, they hate the fucker as much as we do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Well, let's say they're torn.
Bush is a monster to their people. But a great recruiting tool. What to do? What to do?

Leave it alone and count on the Americans to mess it up all by themselves.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. The recruitment drive will continue...
...no matter who wins this election. They want bush out as much as we do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bombtrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Thanks for echoing a baseless right-wing talking point
HOW FUCKING STUPID CAN YOU GET. The terrorists need BUsh to continue their booning in recruitment. They want to get rid of him like the ciggarette companies want to get rid of smokers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Thanks for calling me fucking stupid, you dick.
Edited on Sat Oct-23-04 12:10 PM by porphyrian
Their boom in recruitment will continue regardless of who wins this election because we aren't leaving Iraq any time soon. Pull you head out of your ass.

On edit: ...and thanks for continuing the republican campaign of fear, asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikehiggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. au contraire, mes amis
If kids are hurt in a terrorist attack on Halloween it will be the starkest example yet of the utter failure of the Bush administration to protect our nation.

What is he going to do? Apologise? Hey, I'm sorry we were so busy in Iraq that I didn't notice al Queda was hard at work in the US? Hey, its all Tom Ridge's fault anyway.

Anything real bad that happens here over the next few days is going to cost BushCo the election. Simple as that.

It will mark a total failure of his administration and even the NY POST would have to admit that.

What would they tell the US public after something like that? Trust us with four more years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildflower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Yes, remember the question someone asked Kerry at the town hall debate...
about why there have been no further attacks under *'s administration.

Kerry's answer was that these things are years in the making.

But the question seemed to me to be designed to show that * is tough on terrorism.

-wildflower

P.S. Of course, the question left out the first attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bombtrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. IT's also the night of game 7 of the world series
if there is a game 7. Denis Leary said that even when good things happen to the red sox bad things have to happen. Like the week Fenway opened the Titanic sunk etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Well, there you are. It's the Red Sox' fault.
What happened the night they beat the Yankees?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bombtrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. A girl got killed by cops accidentally
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
8. No..I agree...something is up with this administration...they have nothing
Edited on Sat Oct-23-04 12:04 PM by hopeisontheway
to go one now and Kerry is kicking the chimp's ass! Only thing they have left is to stage/plan a terrorist attack and DECLARE MARTIAL LAW (that way they can cancel the elections - this would be the whole point of a terrorist attack - it's not necessarily about who the terrorist want to be the president - - it's strategy to CANCEL the elections)! We know it's going to happen. I have been begging the Kerry campaign (tellus@johnkerry.com) to start talking about this! We probably could start writing letters to the newspapers about this and start sending our concerns to the media. Don't know if it would do much good, but probably need to start doing something now to stir up ruckus and maybe someone will pick up the story.

Perhaps we could start sending stuff to our friends around the country to start looking out for odd things, like FEMA/CERT being in an area...someone before on DU suggested taking our video cameras everywhere we go to video "odd things". I just dunno...but feel you are right...WE HAVE to do something to get media attention. I would think this would hurt the chimp if we have another terrorist attack, but you know, dips who are still voting for him would fall for this and rally behind the tard!


Jennifer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davsand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. They can't continue martial law indefinitely.
I'm not sure they really WILL benefit from a postponement of the election.

The polling data would seem to indicate that when the public compares Kerry to the asswipe, the asswipe drops in the polls. They can't afford to delay those election for too long, and the public will not allow them to just CANCEL elections. Any delay in elections serves to benefit Kerry.

Additionally, as has been pointed out here up thread, the main thrust of the campaign out of the White House has been that they are the ONLY ones that can keep us all safe. Allowing an attack would undermine that by a huge amount--and might just get them run out of town on a rail.

I think they will stop an "attempted attack" in the last few days before the election. They'll round up a few brown skinned guys and claim they are the ones--hell, maybe they'll even trot out some of the missing folks from Iraq-- as the supposed conspiracy...

That way they saved us, AND managed to inflame public desire for that Charlie Foxtrot in Iraq.

Laura
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Thanks, Laura! Glad to hear that they cannot postpone the elections
indefinitely. I always thought they could! This makes me feel a lot better!


Jennifer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. There's a Supreme Court ruling
that would prohibit nationwide martial law, the Milligan case that held Lincoln's declaration unconstitutional:
"If, in foreign invasion or civil war, the courts are actually closed, and it is impossible to administer criminal justice according to law, then, on the theatre of active military operations, where war really prevails, there is a necessity to furnish a substitute for the civil authority, thus overthrown, to preserve the safety of the army and society; and as no power is left but the military, it is allowed to govern by martial rule until the laws can have their free course. As necessity creates the rule, so it limits its duration; for, if this government is continued after the courts are reinstated, it is a gross usurpation of power. Martial rule can never exist where the courts are open, and in the proper and unobstructed exercise of their jurisdiction. It is also confined to the locality of actual war."

http://www.usconstitution.net/consttop_mlaw.html

It's pretty clear -- if courts cannot conduct business, martial law can be imposed only in the areas where active warfare prevents them from doing so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
17. I don't think so.
I don't think there will be a terrorist attack, I think there maybe a terrorist attack thwarted! Two days before the election, there would be NO WAY to show it was a set up and Shrub would look like he "protected us" from the big, bad terrorists! Even, after it was discovered that it was a fake, we would still be stuck with that dumbass in the office and impeachment would drag on forever!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC