Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Another Stolen Election....rabinowitz

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
nostalgicaboutmyfutr Donating Member (991 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 10:04 AM
Original message
Another Stolen Election....rabinowitz
http://www.oilempire.us/stolenelection2004.html
Another Stolen Election
Diebold determinator: the rise of the (voting) machines
By Mark Robinowitz

On Election Day, I asked to see Lane County's new ballot scanning
machines, made by Sequoia corporation (of England). While watching
the ballots being fed into the machines, a Democratic Party poll
watcher told me the exit polls did not match the election results in
the "swing states" using paperless ballot machines.

There is now ample evidence to confirm this discrepancy -- and that
Senator Kerry won the 2004 Presidential election in both the popular
vote and Electoral College. Exit polls in Ohio, Florida, Iowa, New
Mexico and Nevada predicted a Kerry win, yet Bush was declared the
winner. In several other states, the point spread was significantly
different between the polls and the results, helping ensure that Bush
was given the popular vote. (The 2000 election fraud was embarrassing
for Bush, and claiming that millions more voted for him than for
Kerry, despite a stronger Democratic voter registration drive,
provides a veneer of legitimacy for what is about to happen.)

The Democratic Party let this theft happen. There was ample warning
from computer experts, investigative journalists and leaked documents
that showed how paperless voting is an invitation to vote fraud. The
head of the Diebold corporation, the most famous "touch screen"
manufacturer, had pledged to ensure that the state of Ohio would go
for Bush -- and paperless machines were used in some of their
counties.

In 2002, the Georgia Governor and Senate races were predicted to
favor the incumbent Democrats, yet the touch screen ballot machines
determined that they lost (the first election in that state with this
technology). Bev Harris, author of "Black Box Voting," found numerous
problems that strongly suggest these outcomes were rigged. Despite
this evidence, on October 25, National Public Radio ran a story on
touch screen machines quoting a Georgia elections official who
claimed there were no problems in their initial use.

<SNIP>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC