Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

O come, O come ye Republican challenger

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 04:37 PM
Original message
O come, O come ye Republican challenger
With the new Ipsos Reid polling, it would seem that certain Republicans would be considering challenging Bush for the nomination.

We must closely monitor any cracks and peeling. Also any signs of faltering fundraising.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. wouldn't McCain be 1st in line?
that would be the ideal anti-Kerry weapon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4_Legs_Good Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. McCain could singlehandedly *SAVE* this nation from disaster
or at least that's my feeling. *if* he decided to bite the bullet and take one for the team (assuming he really does love America), and run for President in the General election as an Independent. He gained a huge amount of respect among moderates after the 2000 "election". If he ran on his own ticket he would split the Republican vote and put our man (or Ms. Mosley Braun) in the White House.

Damn, imagine how it would be possible to be proud of America again if we had a McCain/Dean, McCain/Kucinich, etc. race in 2004. I don't love McCain, but I don't think I'd be embarassed of my country if he were President right now.

david

Kucinich 2004

Arianna YES
Recall No
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. McCain is frighteningly conservative
his only saving grace is he's pro-choice.
But I like the idea of him helping Kerry by destroying Bush. And that is a distinct possibility given the personal feelings between the 3 men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diplomats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. McCain is pro-choice?
I thought he was pro-life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Enter John McCain?
Maybe Rudy G.?

Joe Lieberman?....oops nevermind.

Wesley Clark should pull a switch and knock him out.

I say by this time next year Shrub will be about as electable as a chunk of cowshit.

Brother Jeb is smarter (like that's hard) and is supposed to be one of the new maniac tough guys rising in the Repug party. Maybe he'll oust his dim witted sibling.

I'd like to see a Wolfowitz-Perle ticket myself. That's sort of like Hannibal Lecter and The Tooth Fairy joining forces. Not to mention they are both about as lovable as rotting toad carcasses.

Cheney and Rove?

For some reason Karl may not appeal to any voter of skin color. The Veep on the other hand is nearly unstoppable. That guy shakes off heart attacks like the average person does a common cold.

Ahhhhnold?

Methinks come next month he'll have egg on his face. Or has that already happened?

I got it! Tom Delay.

He may lack appealing to voters who actually have hearts, though.

ok, I'm done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I was thinking maybe....
the former governor of Oklahoma, Frank Keating.

I was thinking it would have to be someone Bush has snubbed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Not to enrage Clark supporters
But yes, wouldn't a Clark Republican run just monkey wrench the whole GOP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Not Really
I don't think Clark as a Republican would hurt a thing. After all, Powell was out there in 1999 and that didn't slow the whistle-ass from the rise to power. I don't think there is a reasonable person on the planet that thinks for a single second that if Powell had been the Republican nominee rather than Bush and had won, which he might very well have been able to do legitimately, that the country would be in the mess it is now. Don't get me wrong, this is not an endorsement for any Republican, I'm just saying that there was a man with a very strong military background out there available to compete with Bush the last time and it didn't make any difference.

Thom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Hi ThomWV!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. Gonna be the Chimp.
I can see no scenario in which it's not Dr. Zaius.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
11. A Republican challenger would be the best thing for progressives
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
12. It's not gonna happen
The Pukes will not drop Smirk, and no lockstepper is going to buck him. As for the base, Pukes are not known for their ability to admit they are wrong. Smirk is their boy, and they'll ride that horse right into the ditch. Plus, Smirk's been collecting huuuuuuge amounts of cash. He's the corporatists boy too, and they're not going to see that investment pissed away. I'd say the only hedging of bets they are doing is to make sure they control the black boxes at the polls.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC