Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kennedy says Iraq is 'Bush's Vietnam' - Boston Globe

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
rndmprsn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 10:30 AM
Original message
Kennedy says Iraq is 'Bush's Vietnam' - Boston Globe
Edited on Mon Jan-17-05 10:31 AM by rndmprsn
http://www.boston.com/news/world/middleeast/articles/2005/01/17/kennedy_says_iraq_is_bushs_vietnam/

WASHINGTON -- Senator Edward M. Kennedy said yesterday that President Bush's Iraq policy is ''ridiculous" and disputed Bush's statement that the 2004 reelection validated the war. Iraq is ''Bush's Vietnam," Kennedy said.

Bush, in an interview with The Washington Post published yesterday, said, ''The American people listened to different assessments made about what was taking place in Iraq, and they looked at the two candidates, and chose me."

Kennedy, asked about Bush's comment on CBS's ''Face The Nation," noted that then-President Lyndon Johnson was easily reelected during the Vietnam War but did not seek reelection in 1968. ''Look what happened," Kennedy said. ''Lyndon Johnson had to basically abdicate the presidency because of Vietnam. . . . This is clearly George Bush's Vietnam."

Bush, in the interview with the Post, said he wanted to withdraw troops ''as quickly as possible," but he did not express agreement with a statement by departing Secretary of State Colin L. Powell that troops could begin coming home later this year....

edit - length
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
proudbluestater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thank God for a voice of opposition being raised!
I worry about the future of the party when many of the folks with balls are older. Byrd, Conyers, Kennedy. Then I remember Barbara Boxer and hope she'll bring some of the younger crowd along!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Since you brought up Boxer, didn't Teddy vote FOR Ohio certification?
Pulled a Kerry on us, didn't he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stirk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. Pardon my tangent here, but I have to ask-
Edited on Mon Jan-17-05 10:54 AM by Stirk
did Kennedy say a few days ago that SS is not in any crisis, and that it's relatively minor fiscal problems could be solved by a small raise to payroll taxes? I heard a guy on the radio saying that, but I don't trust guys on the radio. And I can't believe that anybody (except for Republicans, of course) would advocate a raise to payroll taxes while Bush tax cuts for the wealthy are still in place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Are you afraid Social Security won't be dismantled? Don't be.
It will be. And you'll live to regret it (unless you go to REALLY support the troops). Trust me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stirk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Excuse me?
Edited on Mon Jan-17-05 11:02 AM by Stirk
I'm not saying SS should be dismantled, or even "reformed". I'm asking if Kennedy suggested a hike to payroll taxes instead of a repeal of Bush's tax cuts to the wealthy. There is no "SS crisis" to begin with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC