Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Congress, Iraqis and Ink Stained fingers David Schuster nails it.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 06:04 PM
Original message
Congress, Iraqis and Ink Stained fingers David Schuster nails it.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5445086/

By the way, that gets me to one observation I had about covering the State of the Union, just 36 hours after being in Baghdad.  To me, it was surreal to see the members of Congress arrive in their nice cars and motorcades... and then walk into the house chamber wearing their fancy suits and ties.  It was even more surreal to see that some lawmakers, in this incredibly secure and safe coccoon, had stained their own index fingers.

The courage of ordinary Iraqis last Sunday was unmistakable.   They were literally risking their lives by standing in line to vote and by getting their fingers stamped with ink.  The members of Congress who stained their own fingers and wagged them proudly for the cameras were an affront to that courage.  And in my eyes, those lawmakers diminished the true significance of what happened last weekend in Iraq.  The fact is, few members of Congress have a son or daughter serving in the U.S. military.  And few lawmakers have actually ever served themselves.  Furthermore, in Washington, D.C., even "political courage," (never mind the real stuff) is exceptionally rare.  Am I being too cynical?  Probably.  (And I'm sure I'll get a ton of nasty e-mails from some of you.)  But, if members of Congress want to show "solidarity" with the Iraqi people... they are welcome to head to Baghdad, put on a flak jacket, and help/advise the new assembly on writing the constitution.  Or, our lawmakers could serve as "election monitors" in Iraq when the constitution is put to a vote as early as this fall.   That would be courageous and show real solidarity.  An ink-stained american finger, waved for the TV cameras on the floor of the House chamber... is a political stunt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Looks like Schuster is learning something from KO
He certainly wouldn't have learned to be blunt and honest from Tweety.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kikosexy2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. A vulgar...
display of patriotism...we need to ship them to Iraq to fight the insurgency..then I'll have more respect for them..NOT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theresistance Donating Member (595 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wait a minute, may be misinterpreted
but did Congressman actually ink their fingers? Please say they didn't do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Oh yes they did...
hate to break the news. It was one disgusting display, lemme tell ya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. The most certainly did!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theresistance Donating Member (595 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I f***ing can't believe that
sure they haven't been shoved up somewhere?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Rumors have it they were playing with Tinky Winky
He, of course, is the gay purple Teletubby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. Bravo.
We need so many more to stand up and call it what it is: Grandstanding. Opportunism. Hypocrisy. The GOP.

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I was struck exactly by what Schuster was...
I watched these white man who have never in their whole fucking lives had to fight for the right to vote/representation/inclusion and it made me gag.

Grinning idiots, every damn one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ultraist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Exactly! It was a PRO war demonstration put on by empty suits
I found the high drama theatrics of the SOTU to be tasteless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Ms. Boxer was trying to...
save the country the further dishoner of having one more lying war criminal for a Secretary of State. As one of her "liberal constituents", she has served me well and I applaud her for her efforts.

Sorry but those GOP finger-dippers don't know the meaning of respect for Iraqis. I don't think dropping 2000 pound bombs on innocents, unleashing torturers in detention facilities, and putting women back under the veil is quite the show of respect that Iraqis wanted from America.

BTW, you really need to stop watching FOX and turn off Rush. Haven't you heard? It'll rot your brain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
opiate69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. "An instant"? How about a load of 'em?
Condoleeza Rice's lie about the attacks of September 11, 2001:

"I don't think anybody could have predicted that they would try to use an airplane as a missile, a hijacked airplane as a missile." (This lie was told by Condoleeza Rice to the American people on May 16, 2002.)

The truth about Condoleeza Rice's lie:

George W. Bush himself was given a one-and-a-half page briefing on August 6, 2001. That briefing informed him that Osama Bin Laden's organization was capable of using a hijacked American airplane to conduct a major strike against targets within the United States. Furthermore, a month earlier, the Bush Administration was informed that terrorists had concocted plans to use airplanes as missiles. The truth is that experts did predict that terrorists would use hijacked airplanes as missiles, and those experts told George W. Bush about the threat. George W. Bush sat around and did nothing about it.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Condoleeza Rice's lie used to cover for her earlier lie about the attacks of September 11, 2001:

When the Bush Administration was confronted with evidence that Condoleeza Rice had lied, and that George W. Bush had received a briefing warning of terrorist plans to use hijacked airplanes as missiles against American targets, Condoleeza Rice said that Bush got the briefing because he had been so concerned about the elevated terrorist threat levels during the summer of 2001. (This lie was told by Condoleeza Rice to the American people on March 25, 2004.)

The truth about Condoleeza Rice's lie about her lie:

The Central Intelligence Agency has revealed that the terrorist briefing was in no way solicited by George W. Bush. Instead, the Central Intelligence Agency created the brief without any expression of interest from Bush because they thought that the matter was so critical that the President needed to be aware of the terrorist plans without further delay. The truth is that, in spite of the elevated terrorist threat levels just before September 11, George W. Bush did not bother to ask the CIA to be briefed about the methods Osama Bin Laden could use to kill Americans. Bush was on vacation on his dude ranch that month.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Another lie from Condoleeza Rice about Bush's preparations for terrorist attacks:

Embarrassed by reports of Bush's lack of preparation for attacks by Osama Bin Laden, Condoleeza Rice said, "In June and July when the threat spikes were so high we were at battle stations." (This lie was told to the American people by Condoleeza Rice on March 22, 2004)

The truth about this lie from Condoleeza Rice:

When the Clinton Administration got information about high threat levels for terrorist attacks, Bill Clinton ordered his officials to go to battle stations. Bush's anti-terrorism chief Richard Clarke has revealed that George W. Bush never ordered anyone to go to battle stations, even though the reported threat in the weeks before September 11, 2001 was much higher than anything ever reported during the Clinton Administration. Furthermore, George W. Bush ordered that a program to monitor Al Quaida suspects within the United States be discontinued. The truth is that Bush not only failed to order anti-terrorism officials to battle stations, he lowered America's protections against terrorism just as the terrorist threat was reaching record levels.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Still another lie from Condoleeza Rice about September 11:

"Our plan called for military options to attack al Qaeda and Taliban leadership, ground forces and other targets, taking the fight to the enemy where he lived." (Condoleeza Rice told the American people this lie on March 22, 2004)

The truth about this other lie from Condoleeza Rice:

The commission studying the context of the September 11 attacks found that the NSPD plan referred to by Condoleeza Rice in fact had no military component. Commission member Gorelick has stated, "There is nothing in the NSPD that came out that we could find that had an invasion plan, a military plan." George W. Bush's own Deputy Secretary of State, Richard Armitage, admitted to the commission that Condoleeza Rice's claim was completely inaccurate. When Armitage was asked, "Is it true, as Dr. Rice said, 'Our plan called for military options to attack Al Qaida and Taliban leadership'?", Armitage replied "No." The truth is that Condoleeza Rice knew that what she was saying was false. She just made up a claim in order to cover up the failure of George W. Bush to take adequate steps to protect America before September 11, 2001.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. But you forget...
we are Americans, we were supposed to be better that the thugs that ran Iraq.

Instead, it's the same old song for them, just a different singer.

And if you honestly don't think Condi Rice has repeatedly lied through her teeth to the American public, dude, you better get yourself educated or get yourself over to Freeptown, 'cause you are not going to enjoy it here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Fox must not have broadcast Rice's mushroom cloud speech.
Sheesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. Like Bush wearing an aviator costume and "flying" to the real military
Republican politicians pretend like they are honoring people, when in fact all they want to do is compliment themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. And conventioneers wearing purple heart band-aids. the tackiest show
in town. It's all just illusion to them because they have no inner reality. Narcissists, every damn one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rapcw Donating Member (567 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. lol those purple heart band-aids were hella dumb n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. Republican
Republican members stained their own fingers. Few Republian lawmakers have actually ever served. That would have been nailing it. But at least it's something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 02:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC