Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Apparantly I picked a bad day for my first listening to Ed Schultz

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 04:43 PM
Original message
Apparantly I picked a bad day for my first listening to Ed Schultz
His view on treatment of erectile dysfunction is il-lilberal
More over it is anti-progressive, and his popularism
is that of the ignorant.

I wish I had listened on a different day :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Langis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. He has good and bad days
Some days I have to turn him off because I am so mad...


You can tell he used to be a Conservative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Well, based on today, I'm not sure I'll ever go back.
I get the idea that the democratic party is a big tent.

BUT GODDAMMIT!!! He has NO business calling himself a progressive.
I heard him claim being a progressive. THAT Pissed me off.

I've lived in N. Minnesota, he is a friggin right winger compared to the people I've met from Fargo, Mil Lacs, Black Duck, Ball Club, Duluth, Bemidji, Red Lake, Elizabeth, Grand Rapids, Duluth, etc.

I'm disappointed. I suppose it shows
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carrion Donating Member (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. Interesting...
Is there really a liberal versus conservative position on E.D??????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Yeah, I think that there is...
Here is how I'd outline it...

A liberal is a person that is broadly open minded.


A conservative is a person that is the opposite...which is narrow minded, referrring here to just the issue of how broadly one defines an issue.

Disease is defined in pathology testbooks as a departure from normal physiological function.

Now a liberal view is one that broadly allows all physiological dysfunction to be considered diseases worth treating if a treatment is available.

A conservative view is one that narrowly defines diseases worth treating. On Ed Schultz that means those that are life-threatening. And that is a much much narrower (conservative) definition.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty_the_Right Donating Member (381 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. I kinda agree with you in general about Ed
But I'm not sure I agree on this issue?

I turned him on right as he was ending that discussion, but what was it he said that you didn't agree with?

I thought that he was saying that viagra being paid for, and birth control isn't, is inconsistant?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. He was suggesting agreement with the concept that e.d. shouldn't
be funded under medicare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty_the_Right Donating Member (381 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Are you sure he isn't saying
That if you are going to fund one, you should fund the other?

And if you aren't, you should be promoting the one that leads to sex?

I think it just part of the right wing hypocrisy that he is pointing out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. That's not what I heard
He had some representative on and interviewed who had introduced legislation against funding viagra, cialis etc. And then he said he agreed with him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty_the_Right Donating Member (381 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. How long did you listen?
Edited on Tue Feb-22-05 05:22 PM by Lefty_the_Right
Because he just said what I thought he was saying.

If you are going to fund one, you should fund the other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. I've been listening for an hour or so
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. i like ed
didn't hear the bit you mentioned, but he's been great on the gannon stuff
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. I missed today...but he's looking for the Limbaugh audience and
I couldn't understand what he said that disappointed you...but compared to Limbaugh and what's been on my local radio for years which is RW and Religious Hatred...I'm happy to have Schultz. You wouldn't believe how bad it's been if you live in the South.

He's okay...give him another chance. He does have our Dem Congress on quite a bit and has supported the Washington State Recount and Media Reform. He has Rep. Louise Slaughter on all the time and she's fighting to get the "Fairness Doctrine" reinstated and also to get investigation of Guckert.

Most of the time I think he tries to be the "everyman" and it makes him sound kind of conservative. He's more conservative than I am, but I always get where he's coming from and understand that where I live there are more like him than me. Plus the Limbaugh style attracts those who might be sick of Limbaugh and are looking for a substitute.

Other Du'ers find him hard to take, too, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. he converted my barry goldwater repuplican landlord
and got two guys in my apolitical family hooked, so there's something to be said for his style
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I'm not surprised based on today
If you can convince people THIS is the democratic party its a half step from Barry AuH2O.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. he's got them taking about media reform and saving social security
so he's ok in my book -
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. What show are you listening to?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. http://cc.liquidviewer.com/radio/standard/radioplayer.php?UID=4#
and its sad to think that he is feeding this crap to people who think he is liberal and protection.

he says a person should "OWN YOUR OWN ERECTION"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. is he some loud domineering forceful guy who
men don't think will secretly shrink their balls or something?

Is he like Limbaugh in that way?

I just think those men are mostly libertarian and if they are on our side of the line it's by a pinky toe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Not even close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. I'd say, loud and pitching voice as argumentative maybe an
attempt at domineering.

I think a voice pattern analysis on Limbaugh and Schultz might show a majority of similarities.

But, I don't mind his voice so much as I dislike his philosophical orientation:

It isn't close to broad-minded (although it is anti-Bush)

It isn't about expanding rights and quality of life.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
9. I think he is fine today. Ed Rocks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
16. Guess I'm not a liberal cause I'm with Big Ed on this one
I'd rather see Medicare take care of drugs for seniors that are necessary. I just don't see erectile dsyfunction drugs as being necessary. I'd rather not see my tax dollars funding the pharmaceutical companies advertising these drugs ad nauseum.

When we don't have seniors and others struggling to pay drug costs they absolutely need to keep them alive then I'd be willing to talk about tax dollars paying for what I see as lifestyle drugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. I guess on this one you aren't, by your own admission
And I don't have a problem with democrats spanning from liberal to conservative views.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mantis49 Donating Member (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #16
27. I'm with you Rambo.
Medicare is truly in trouble.

Erectile dysfunction secondary to venous insufficiency of the penis is not a life threatening problem. I think there has to be a limit somewhere.

Birth control was mentioned in some previous posts. There are not many 65+ year old women on Medicare wanting contraceptives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
24. There are some gray areas...
..like cosmetic surgeries, hair transplants and the like.

So, I suspect there are gray areas in penis health also.

I can't fault Ed for drawing a line.

But, I do fault him for not understanding that it wasn't the CIA who sent us to war in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. The issue for me is expanding ALL types of treatment where
there is pathology and where there is effective treatment.

Moreover, I think making a comparison between hair transplants and e.d. is a reach. Hair can be treated with wigs, minoxidal as well as hair transplantation.

I am not aware of any surgical treatment for e.d. that is cheaper than viagra, levitra or cialis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Your comparison between hair transplants and e.d. has been noted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UdoKier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
28. I'm not a huge Schultz fan, but you're wrong on this.
ED drugs are not NEARLY as high a priority as many other ailments that are going untreated. With limited resources, it's unconscionable to spend on Viagra & Cialis (and their bloated advertising budgets)

Ed & his guest made a good argument why it shouldn't be covered.

You're on the same side with a lot of republican politicians on this...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. I understand arguments about limited funds and prioritization
what I don't get is making fun of people, and that was where most of the commentary went, with Big Ed's approval
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UdoKier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. I suppose you're right, but...
if it entices people out of Limbaugh's gutter, I'm all for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chaska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
29. This is a one big erect giveaway to the drug companies.
Ed's right.

And to publicly condemn one of our guys who is out there in public fighting for us day in and day out is stupid. Give the man a fair hearing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Hey its the presentation I'm arguing against, his argument is
Edited on Tue Feb-22-05 06:56 PM by HereSince1628
based on pragmatism that wasn't enlightened in anyway by apologies to liberal or progressive ideals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
33. White Rose is archiving a new radio show "Bob Kincaid"
I've listened to his last Friday and this Monday shows. I'm impressed, its a very good show. Bob Kincaid reminds me of Thom Hartmann.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC