|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Allah Akbar (231 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-03 04:15 PM Original message |
I would like to put to bed one Anti-Larouche canard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jiacinto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-03 04:16 PM Response to Original message |
1. LaRouche is bad news |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Allah Akbar (231 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-03 04:18 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Insightful and well stated as always |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robcon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-03 06:52 PM Response to Reply #1 |
42. LaRouche is a crazy man |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-03 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
2. I would vote for George W. Bush before Lyndon LaRouche |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Allah Akbar (231 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-03 04:29 PM Response to Reply #2 |
12. I just provided three links out of literally thousands |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-03 04:33 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. No, you provided links that the British were involved in the opium trade |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Allah Akbar (231 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-03 04:38 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. And why even look into it, since it's absurd on its face |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-03 04:40 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. Until there is supporting evidence, yes it is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Allah Akbar (231 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-03 04:42 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. And as long as everyone is content to dismiss it as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-03 04:44 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. Raising assertions does nothing without evidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Allah Akbar (231 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-03 04:48 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. You've honestly never seen any evidence that the CIA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-03 04:51 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Without evidence, it is crazy talk to assert that Queen Elizabeth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eloriel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-03 06:30 PM Response to Reply #26 |
39. C'mon, Walt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-03 08:37 PM Response to Reply #39 |
43. Cool, evidence that the CIA deals drugs! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-13-03 12:48 AM Response to Reply #43 |
48. Do you know anything about what the drug business represents? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-13-03 10:34 AM Response to Reply #48 |
62. Uh...LaRouche claims QEII is involved in the drug trade |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-13-03 12:07 AM Response to Reply #2 |
45. I thought you said ABB! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nolabels (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-13-03 06:30 PM Response to Reply #2 |
64. okay, but the only absurd thing are questions that don't get asked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
molly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-03 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
3. I picked up the phone about an hour ago and a woman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Allah Akbar (231 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-03 04:20 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. I know I'm not a good little Dembot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
molly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-03 04:21 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Do you support him and if so - why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Allah Akbar (231 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-03 04:23 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. I don't have to support or not support anyone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Allah Akbar (231 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-03 04:22 PM Response to Original message |
7. Oddly enough, we have here several of those I had in mind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ButterflyBlood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-03 04:24 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. this is a guy who spent 5 years in prison for fraud |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
absolutezero (879 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-13-03 12:17 AM Response to Reply #9 |
46. Actually they are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-13-03 04:56 AM Response to Reply #9 |
56. set up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blitz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-13-03 05:34 AM Response to Reply #56 |
57. Do you have anything from an independent source? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-13-03 07:20 AM Response to Reply #57 |
58. are there independent anti-LaRouche sources? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blitz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-13-03 07:31 AM Response to Reply #58 |
59. Hundreds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-03 04:25 PM Response to Original message |
10. absolutely probable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nothingshocksmeanymore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-03 04:26 PM Response to Original message |
11. Yes and every once in a while Pat Buchanan has a good point too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Allah Akbar (231 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-03 04:31 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. So basically everyone's going to dance around this one huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-03 04:42 PM Response to Reply #14 |
21. I'll answer it once you presnet evidence to support the assertion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Allah Akbar (231 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-03 04:53 PM Response to Reply #21 |
27. Well, it looks to me like you are saying there is no way it is happening |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-03 08:40 PM Response to Reply #27 |
44. Again, trot out your evidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nothingshocksmeanymore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-03 06:08 PM Response to Reply #14 |
37. Look even a broken watch is right twice a day |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Allah Akbar (231 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-13-03 02:21 AM Response to Reply #37 |
53. I think you are inserting your own thing in here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-03 04:32 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. yeech! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Allah Akbar (231 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-03 04:39 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. I'm not sure what you are trying to insinuate here? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-03 04:43 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. what am I trying to imply? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Allah Akbar (231 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-03 04:56 PM Response to Reply #23 |
29. I don't mean to make anyone happy or disappoint them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-13-03 12:59 AM Response to Reply #29 |
50. didn't mean to put you in some straight-jacket |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Allah Akbar (231 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-13-03 07:22 PM Response to Reply #50 |
66. What kind of backing would I have to have? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-03 04:30 PM Response to Original message |
13. You have provided google links on the Opium Wars |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Allah Akbar (231 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-03 04:34 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. I just think it unfair |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-03 04:59 PM Response to Reply #17 |
31. Well, let's leave all that aside |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Allah Akbar (231 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-03 05:09 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. Well, I'll have to re-read what I wrote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-03 06:12 PM Response to Reply #34 |
38. You have put nothing to bed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Allah Akbar (231 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-13-03 02:01 AM Response to Reply #38 |
51. I haven't been pissy with anyone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-13-03 07:56 AM Response to Reply #38 |
60. i think the point is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Allah Akbar (231 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-13-03 07:13 PM Response to Reply #38 |
65. I am not an investigative journalist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Elidor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-03 04:56 PM Response to Original message |
28. The source of an idea should ideally be separable from the idea itself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Allah Akbar (231 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-03 05:03 PM Response to Reply #28 |
33. Of course your right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eloriel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-03 06:47 PM Response to Reply #28 |
41. Now THAT's one of the most lucid posts I've seen in a while |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-13-03 12:23 AM Response to Reply #28 |
47. Woop. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Allah Akbar (231 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-13-03 02:32 AM Response to Reply #28 |
54. I disagree with this part |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MSchreader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-03 04:57 PM Response to Original message |
30. I am all too familiar with the Opium Wars of the 19th century |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Allah Akbar (231 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-13-03 10:31 AM Response to Reply #30 |
61. Gee, if I didn't know any better |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jonnyblitz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-03 05:00 PM Response to Original message |
32. "Lyndon LaRouche and the New American Fascism" by Dennis King |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Allah Akbar (231 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-03 05:13 PM Response to Reply #32 |
35. Thanks for the heads up on the book, Jonny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-03 06:04 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. On the old boards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jonnyblitz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-03 06:35 PM Response to Reply #35 |
40. that is why rather than go on a rant about LaRouche... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nolabels (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-13-03 12:51 AM Response to Original message |
49. Drugs are only part of the story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Allah Akbar (231 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-13-03 02:15 AM Response to Reply #49 |
52. Neat site! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nolabels (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-13-03 03:01 AM Response to Reply #52 |
55. Or flies into the large buildings of their citys |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theemu (531 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-13-03 10:47 AM Response to Original message |
63. Okay, but he is a nutcase. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-14-03 06:39 AM Response to Reply #63 |
67. again, no substance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hayu_lol (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-14-03 06:57 AM Response to Reply #67 |
68. This is what happens when the Lyndon LaRouche people are allowed... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 08th 2024, 08:18 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC