Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NPR ombudsman: 'Sense of outrage growing in the country'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-05 11:12 PM
Original message
NPR ombudsman: 'Sense of outrage growing in the country'
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?columnId=2781901

Widespread Outrage

At a public meeting in Jackson, Miss., last week, a listener to NPR programs on Mississippi Public Broadcasting asked me if I had detected a sense of outrage growing in the country.

If my inbox is anything to go by, I certainly have. The reasons for this cyber-outrage might be worth pondering.

NPR's correspondent on religious issues, Barbara Bradley Hagerty, and I spoke this past weekend at a church in the Washington, D.C., area. The topic: how NPR covers religion and spirituality and the response it gets from the listeners.

Barbara made the observation that, in her experience, conservatives are increasingly concerned that they are losing the "culture wars" in the United States. That anxiety, Barbara said, keeps growing even though Republicans control the White House and Congress and might soon control the Supreme Court. Even so, courts keep ruling against displays of Judeo-Christian symbols in publicly funded places, sex education is taught in schools and homosexuality appears to be increasingly accepted in the cultural mainstream.

From the left, I sense that some of the e-mail nastiness has to do with frustration over the re-election of President Bush. These listeners feel that the media was unwilling or unable to stop Bush's ascent to victory.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-05 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. The other major point in this story was to give advice on how to write
Edited on Mon Mar-14-05 11:32 PM by Nothing Without Hope
emails that will be listened to. He gives a list of pointers that is quite reasonable. After quoting nasty examples of both a RW and a LW vituperative email, he goes into first WHY people on both sides seem more angry than before (he missed the boat on the progressives - it's the stolen election and the horror of the policies, not the media's failure to keep Bush from "winning" ) - he instructs in how to do it right. He also admits that they are to some extent guided by the response from the audience they serve, so let's keep those (non-vituperative but firm an clear) emails and letters going out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-05 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-05 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. May it continue! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-05 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. Main Stream US citizens do not want a theocracy shoved
down their throats by splinter groups of right wing fanatics who claim Bush owes them and he better deliver.

As far as the "election" goes, there are strong doubts as to its credibility. When the Diebold CEO previously stated that he will do everything he can to get Bush elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-05 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. There is a good analysis of these comments
at this site:

http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/

Calling for a more civil dialogue, as Dvorkin does, is perfectly well-intentioned. But it is not a reply to a sense of outrage growing in the country. Complaints about bias have mutated into something far more serious today: a campaign to discredit the liberal media, marginalize the national press, and deny professional journalism any hold on the public interest. I've been writing about it-- and objecting. So have others. David Shaw of the Los Angeles Times says we're paranoid.

A whole front in the Culture War is now devoted to these activities of disqualifying the traditional press, and raising substitutes like Jeff Gannon. That is action from the Right, but the Left often feels equally enraged at the failures of Big Journalism, and it is stupified by the success of the "liberal media" charge. What Liberal Media? as Eric Alterman put it (2003). Oh That Liberal Media, as the "reply blog" says back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. A *LOT* of my "outrage" is over the crap NPR calls "reporting"...
Edited on Tue Mar-15-05 01:59 PM by BiggJawn
Mara Liason, Cokie Roberts, Juan Williams, top 3 contenders in the "George Bush Media Suck-Off" contest. I don't think even Wulf Blither can suck Bush as well as the other 3 can.

Well, at least I learned from this that it's a waste of bandwidth to send National Propaganda Radio a "Dear Sir, you cur" letter.

"Political reporting on NPR is made possible through a grant from the Republican National Committee, who reminds us that 'Sooner or later, you'll all be Republicans', and the Soylent Corporation, makers of Soylent Green, and the whole family of fine Soylent "food" products...This is NPR, National Propaganda Radio...."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Instead of a general complaint, which might be written off
Send an email about a specific story and why it is biased or inaccurate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Yo, where can I try out that Soylent Green stuff. Its sounds Bushlicious!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC