Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I think it would make greater sense for GM and Ford to simply get

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
KlatooBNikto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-05 07:59 AM
Original message
I think it would make greater sense for GM and Ford to simply get
Edited on Sun Apr-10-05 08:00 AM by KlatooBNikto
out of the automotive business and sell their assets to the Chinese or Koreans or the Japanese so the jobs of the people can be preserved before it is too late.The managements of both companies have proven that they do not have the savvy to cut the mustard in the changed automotive world of today. Continuing the travesty of their business will prolong the spiral of disaster that awaits these companies.It is far more important to preserve the jobs of the people than to let the big wigs rip the companies off further with their bloated salaries and stock options.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-05 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. gm and ford own parts of just about
all the other car companies in the world. the big problem is the american consumer- we demanded suv`s,big trucks,huge cars to haul our asses around. these companies built what "we" demanded and they complied. didn`t matter to the usa consumer, they still bought what ever gm and ford built. i don`t feel sorry for them at all or the suv owners who are going to be stuck with huge repair bills on the crap they bought or the realization that that thing they paid for is worth 10 cents on the dollar when they try to unload suv`s,etc,because of 3 dollar gas.
gm and ford build some really good cars-in other countries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-05 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. "so the jobs of the people can be preserved"
I wouldn't hold your breath. Many of those jobs would be eliminated in an attempt to improve efficiency, and good luck enforcing union rules on wages and benefits if the ownership moves out of the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-05 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. All the mfg jobs are in Mexico or elsewhere anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-05 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Uh, no.
Edited on Sun Apr-10-05 09:31 AM by TwilightZone
A great deal of Ford's manufacturing is still performed in Detroit, Chicago, and other US cities. Tens of thousands of jobs, in fact.

In addition, many of their suppliers - who also employ thousands of people - are located in the US.

Edit: typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KlatooBNikto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-05 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. If you look at Honda and Toyota, many of their manufacturing actvity
is concentrated in this country.In that sense they are more American than GM and Ford.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-05 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. More accurately, some of their production for US vehicles is here.
Production of vehicles for most of the rest of the world, however, is in Japan.

In addition, even those vehicles built by Honda & Toyota in the US are often comprised of parts supplied by Japanese or other foreign suppliers.

Sorry, but they certainly are not "more American" than GM or Ford. In any sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-05 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. Worked for GM during most of the '60 when stock was in the $50-range:
if it has split only once as I seem recall, that $50 would have grown to the mid-$50s in only 35+ years, but of course GM has usually paid good dividends, so not all has been lost for the small shareholder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeAnnan Donating Member (423 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-05 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Those kinds of gains are going to be hard to come by in the future.
According to NYT, there is now a worldwide glut of 36 million cars and it is going to get worse as China and India enter the market.I can visualize the day when $10,000 autos from these countries are sold at Wal-Mart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-05 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Addennum: just reviewed the GM chart back to 1970 when GM traded higher
during that year than today's price. I recall hearing an official say "get them out on the street and we'll fix 'em later." Maybe that mindset and strategy were not well received in the long run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hickman1937 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-05 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
10. I'm a ford worker leased to Visteon. the writing is on the wall.
Wall street will not stand for parts workers making a living wage when there is so much cheap labor out there. These jobs are going, along with my loyalty to any car co. Companies move their manufacturing to slave wage markets, who can't afford to buy the product, and dump the product into established markets(USA). I'm starting to look into mass transit activism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeAnnan Donating Member (423 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-05 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Depending on your age, it can be a good or bad move.If you are young,
good.If you are well past your 50's, bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hickman1937 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-05 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I'm 50. Why do I need to be young to start pushing for
a return to mass transit?:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC