Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

my wife had to submit to a urine & hair drug test

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 09:26 AM
Original message
my wife had to submit to a urine & hair drug test
to apply at a local casino. i understand the urine test detects recent drug use, but the hair test can detect drugs going back many years. she has nothing to fear, but i'm curious about this hair test.

anyone ever give a hair sample, or know anything about it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think the whole thing is bad. This to work in a casino?
Maybe to fly a plane but what are we coming to ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
losdiablosgato Donating Member (649 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
31. More and more business insurance companies require drug testing
It is now done in a lot of jobs if you can prove you have a drug free work force is lowers your insurance. In fact at my job it is required.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. A friend who was a croupier in Vegas told me...
that everyone in Las Vegas is subject to drug screening, except the police. (This may have been changed.) I know you can beat the urine tests. My friend told me there is a shampoo which stymies the hair test as well.

--IMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. Hair Test last several months
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
4. Heres a link from high times
There is a whole industry of products for passing drugs tests,
shampoos, and things to drink.

http://www.urine5.com/test/hair.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burn the bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. even though they offer guarantees, they don't usually work
after spending 40 bucks for one, my daughter tested positive. However the thing they are using now is the stuff you buy at the store for canning. Cant think of the name, sur... Will have to ask if anyone wants to know.

You mix the whole packet with large amount of water and drink it. On the third piss after drinking it you will test clean. It temporarily holds the substance in it apparently. It's the stuff that makes gel.

have heard and known of several people who have passed on this method.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catmandu57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Pectin?
That's what it sounds like, anyway you can tell times are getting harder when they want to drug test for employment. During the nineties when everything was booming and the demand for employees was so big, drug testing was done with a wink and a smile.
It's getting so you'll be piss tested to scoop dogshit now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burn the bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Yes I think it is pectin but called suregel or something like that
found in your grocery store. I think the piss testing has gotten out of control too. I can see why you would not want a coke head to work for you. I've seen many a coke head do things that they normally would never consider to get the drug. That includes, lying, cheating, stealing, robbery, and other shit too.

But pot smokers are not in the same catagory.

piss test to scoop dog poop-thats funny

they are doing piss tests in my sons school now. They say it is random but if my son still went there i can guarantee that his random test would be weekly. The only random thing about it would be which day of the week it would be given. I know this to be true because they searched my son 6 times within the first 6 weeks of school. Never did they find anything. I finally told them to call the police in if they felt they needed to search him. They stopped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catmandu57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. Damn, I found a big fat roach
gone now though. I'd better not fill out any apps :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burn the bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anarchy1999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. Pectin.
n/t

It does work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfan454 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #12
23. Certo
It works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burn the bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. thats it Certo. Ok it's not much like shurgel or whatever i was thinking
it's certo and yes, it does seem to work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bennywhale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
5. Utter disgrace
that anyone should be tested in this way at all. What your wife may or may not have put into her body in the preceding weeks or months is nothing to do with anyone but her.

You can also get a DNA profile from hair i think which is even more worrying.

These tests are becoming ever more common, and i would simply refuse to have one and kick up a fuss.

Because its voluntary (ie you don't have to take the job) there can't be much of an outcry, and once it becomes completely the norm, you can bet the government will use it as it will have become acceptable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KC21304 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
6. They can see you producing your hair sample
but . . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
7. hair tests are not widely accepted in criminal or other settings
it has been argued that hair can pick up drugs in the air so you don't have to injest them. We won't allow hair tests to deny unemployment.

To get a job is a much "lower" level of "rights" so its not illegal. The courts are not accepting them...at least not widely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selteri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #7
16. Hair CAN and DOES pick up 'atmospheric contaminants
Hence it has been rules inadmisable in a court of law.

Being in the same building as someone who's doing coke, heroine or marijuana the fumes can bond to your hair. It is a flawed system just as the drug tests from urine can provide false positives for eating at a fast food resturaunt with poppy seed buns, taking aleave or Ibuprofene.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wideopen Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
8. find another job
I'll be damned if I would work at a place w/such bullshit rules. Why in the hell does it matter if you do drugs on your own time as long as you don't at work? This shit really gets to me, talk about invasion of privacy, I don't think it gets much worse than submitting bodily fluids and hair to get a job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
9. You know what's funny?
People who work for school districts don't have to be drug tested. At least not the teachers and administrators. You'd think educators would need to be drug tested as much or more than anyone, since they are with kids. I'm not advocating it, in fact I don't advocate it for any employees except maybe pilots, etc. But I think it's odd.

Of course there's the matter of money. Drug testing isn't cheap and school districts barely have the money to fix their schools and buy textbooks, forget drug testing teachers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenbriar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #9
24. Bullshit
Before teachers step one foot in the classroom, they are drug tested and background tested and fingerprinted!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Oh yeah?
Edited on Thu May-05-05 11:46 AM by Bouncy Ball
LMAO!!!

Where? They have their background checked, they might even be fingerprinted NOWDAYS (but not a few years ago), but drug tested?

Again, where?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenbriar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. well the urine sample they watched me produce
in 2001 was in Kansas


The blood they took was in Kansas


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. Kansas, ok where else?
Edited on Thu May-05-05 11:55 AM by Bouncy Ball
You said teachers get drug tested before they step foot in the classroom, so that assumed you meant everywhere in this country.

I'm in education in Texas and have taught in Georgia, too.

I was NEVER asked to take a drug test and we still don't drug test in Texas.

Oh the KIDS are randomly drug tested, but not the teachers.

Here's an article I found:

http://www.stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/177/lockney.shtml

It's about Texas.

Also this is from 96, but it's about Kansas. http://www.mediarelations.ksu.edu/WEB/News/NewsReleases/drugtesting.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #9
30. What's funny is your little doggy daisy
How cute is that? Love it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gyre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
10. She's got no rights to privacy as an applicant.
She has the option of saying no, and they have the option of saying no as well. Once she's hired, that's another story altogether.

Gyre
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selteri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #10
19. Not really, in Michigan they started firing employees who
wouldn't submit to or who tested positive for nicotine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livinginphotographs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
32. Yes, she has that option, but my problem with drug tests
(I let someone else argue the civil liberties aspect) is that I can suck down an 8-ball and a week or so later I test clean. If I smoke a blunt at a party and take a piss test three weeks later, I test positive and don't get hired.

Who would you rather hire, the occasional pot smoker or the cokehead?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burn the bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
11. hair test
i think they have very expensive ones that can go back ten years, but that the ones generally used will only go back about 3 months.

I know of someone who passed one. He smoked within two weeks of the test but is very physical, and cuts his hair frequently. I don't know if the hair cutting has anything to do with it at all since they are dealing with the follicles. The physicalnes has some effect as I think it is hidden in fat cells so a fatter person will test positive far longer than a fit person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
13. What bothers me more is having to submit to a background
check...in order to apply. Not too long ago, I was filling out applications for various retail places. You can't fill out an application at the stores much anymore; they tell you to go on-line and give you the store number. But before you can even get to filling in the application, you have to agree to a background check that includes interviewing your neighbors.

Are you saying she had to submit in order to apply, or that she's in the running after an interview and now has to have a drug test. :shrug:

I can understand a drug test and/or background check if they are going to offer you the job (though I don't like the invasion of having to submit before being suspected). But, it's putting applicants over a barrel requiring them to agree to these just so you can fill out an application, IMO. Who's to say at some time in the future that by agreeing to that they can't do a check any time they choose for reasons other than employment? I don't trust them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthernSpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
21. with hair tests, they usually use only...
... the 1 1/2" closest to the scalp. On average, human scalp hair grows a little less than 1/2" per month, though this can vary a lot: in four weeks, my hair grows about 2/3", and some people's grows even faster than that. So the detection period for that 1 1/2" of hair could reflect anything from the past 6 months to just the previous 8 weeks.

The standards for hair testing are not as firm as those for urine testing. Different substances behave differently in the hair shaft (some 'migrate', some don't), and the pigment content of hair can affect the extent to which it retains traces of various substances. Add in the all the different things that people do to their hair, such as bleaching, dyeing, and other chemical treatments, and you can see why there are a lot of unknowns.

In practice, I suspect that a hair test is usually just a test of whether one can lay off the :smoke: for twelve weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cheezus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
22. Would she have let them SEARCH YOUR HOME?
you know, to look for drugs or child porn or signs of other criminal activity?

after all, if she had nothing to fear...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
29. Once asked to take a lie detector test
to work in an overnight CONVENIENCE STORE. Couldn't believe it. Told them to forget it, got up and walked out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC