Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Yesterday was a great victory for us in my opinion...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Independent_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 02:19 PM
Original message
Yesterday was a great victory for us in my opinion...
We were able to save the filibuster.

7 Repub Senators caved.

I absolutely love it.

We have to keep fighting. If you've jumped on the victim bandwagon, it's time to jump off it now.

Pessimism gets us nowhere.

We have more battles ahead. I think we're on the road to something big.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Read
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. paint it any way you want but...
the republicans broke the fillibuster on Owen without having to re-write the rules or get 60 votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. I put a link to your article on our local county web site
I think it is a good read..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LightningFlash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. In these types of wars, you both win and lose. n.t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fertilizeonarbusto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is a very unpopular opinion around here
but I tend to agree. Or maybe I think that optimism is more conducive to eventual victory. Think of Churchill during the worst of the Blitz: always, always officially optimistic. He got the British people to think they could win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. I don't know. I think a lot of people agree but just don't yell it as
often as people who think it was bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. It wasn't optimism that won the Battle of Britain.
It was fighting tooth and claw like a cornered rat against a vastly superior enemy, and refusing to back down, compromise or surrender.

When we start fighting like that, then I'll be optimistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rigel99 Donating Member (621 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. Keep those rose colored glasses on but here are the facts...

1. the repugs can call to remove the filibuster anytime again
2. we gave up 3 very harsh judges to the citizens of the US who will suffer their hateful bigotry
3. if the senators caved, then that meant Frist did not have the votes needed to kill the filibuster
4. Dems gave up the right to use the filibuster

bottom line, we negotiated with terrorists.


a better show of backbone would be democrats walking out of the senate and not coming back for days/weeks/months to show just one ONE BRANCH government we have become... and then the citizens get in the streets and demand impeachment...

calling this a victory is like saying 'they only used a little bit of gas in the gas chambers of auschwitz', as a gay person in today's climate I"m very upset people want to praise the very democrats that have let this happen to save their jobs....

no, my friend, this is not pessimism, but healthy realism to what a joke the whole filibuster issue was, in a true democracy, we would not have to give a president better part of 97% of his judges, let him fire massively most of the federal judges and install his own guard, this is not a democracy and we should all be in the streets stopping traffic till our demands are heard....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chipper Chat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yeah, but the trump card is.....
Frist has been embarrased and his iron grip has been relaxed. McCain (albeit Mr. 2-Face) has let the moderate wing of the GOP out of prison, and Bush has been rebuked regardless of the smiley face he wears. Those seven Republicans did not "cave in." They are courageous and principled, especially Lindsay Graham (who has the most to lose). As a staunch Democrat I have nothing but respect for the "GOP 7."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geomon666 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. How can you have respect for those people.
As a staunch Democrat I have nothing but respect for the "GOP 7."

After everything they've done to this country, how can you respect them? Because of some percieved goodness? Did they not vote to make her a federal judge?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chipper Chat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. I respect them for standing up to the cat killer.
I've always respected the 2 Maine women, Warner...well...pass, Graham - still would blast him for what he did to Clinton. McCain - still have some hope for him.
Something I learned: I've always been a fence-sitter on Chuck Hagel. But after hearing his comments blasting the deal, now I know he just cannot remove his nose from shrub's ass - and I have written him off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. It Is Impossible, Mr. Chat, For Me To Agree
To warrant respect, those seven would have to break with Frist on all votes. Inded, in this matter, they would have had to serve him notice they would vote against any attempt to shut off the fillibuster, now or in the future, and require him to public abjure that course, and acknowledge his error in attempting to subvert the rules and traditions of the Senate.

It seems to me it would have been a better course to force the enemy to bring this matter to a vote, now, and let the chips fall as they would. Either these persons would have abandoned Frist publicly and seen to the defeat of the pernicious course he pressed, or they would have stood by him, and the country been treated to the spectacle of a dictatorial over-reach so colossal as to ensure a serious and lasting plitical backlash from persons committed to our democratic system of rule, that would likely bear great fruit at the polls in '06....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chipper Chat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. I agree with you 100%.
I myself was itching for that scenario. But it didn't happen, so we'll just have to see how this plays out. Of course we could be right back to square 1 in a few months if shrub, who we all know is ultra-defensive, just for spite proposes Rodgers or Owen for SCOTUS. Talk about raising the stakes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
13. I knew not everyone would agree with me...
I guess it all depends on how you look at it.

I just look at it as "we were able to save the filibuster for now." There will be other battles in the future. We should always be ready. We won't win everytime on everything.

But we should be anything but victims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Half of us lost sight of what the primary issue was
It wasn't the fillibuster, it was the nomination of hideously unacceptable judges to lifetime jobs at very high levels. Owens is one step away from a SC seat. They got their appointment. We got a promise that maybe next time we dare to say no they won't take away our fillibuster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC