Clark's detractor to face questioning

[Another Bill C.]

The Republican News Service (not that one) reports:

"British Army General Mike Jackson has been formally recalled
to face further questioning by the Bloody Sunday Inquiry."

"Jackson, who was a captain in the Parachute Regiment in 1972,
was asked to make the second statement after it emerged he had
written documents containing interviews with soldiers after
the Bloody Sunday killings.

"He had previously denied he was involved in producing such
documents."

"In submissions to the inquiry, Jackson has been accused by
counsel to some of the families of producing a "bogus" army HQ
report some days after Bloody Sunday, in an attempt to justify
the number of rounds fired by the British army and the number
of dead."

http://www.irlnet.com/aprn/current/news/25bloo.html

[dfong63]

1. so when will Clark be re-questioned on Kosovo war civilian bombings,

... and use of depleted uranium, and cluster bombs?

[MattNC]

2. i dont know

but he volunteered himself to face trials for war crimes.

[dean4america]

4. he did?

not questioning you, just had never heard that before. is there a link to this?

[Pepperbelly]

9. he submitted his conduct for ...

justice. No charges were filed.

[Pastiche423]

8. Link please

clark was subjected to face war crimes. He NEVER volunteered.

[ShaneGR]

5. Just after Milosevic is found guilty in the Hague

There's a little trial going on right now you know.

[KG]

3. oops, thought this thread was about a DUer that dared to

suggest clark didn't walk on water! :eyes:

[Clark Can WIN]

6. Oh you gotta be kidding me

Do you READ this effin board? No wonder Rush likes it so much in here. Gives him all his talking points.

[KG]

10. thanks for proving my point..

:eyes:

btw - i was reading this board for 2 years before clark decided he was a democrat.

[Pepperbelly]

11. in that case ...

how does it feel to be saying the same things Rush is saying?

Just curious.

[KG]

12. what did i say that rush is saying??

cite please.

[Pepperbelly]

14. I apologize if you ...

have not been one of the posters using Drudge links and Limbaugh rants to bash Clark. Those include the closet republican charges and the hillary stalking horse charge. Have you used them?

If not, then accept my apology.

If not, then you could answer the question.

[KG]

16. nope. never used them.

i got my reasons to not support clark. and i thought them up all by myself.

:)

[Pepperbelly]

17. then accept my apology ...

I am perhaps too sensitive but then again, the question is not whether one is paranoid. The question is whether one is paranoid enough.

:D

[NNN0LHI]

13. And what is that supposed to prove? Expecting an award or something?

>>>i was reading this board for 2 years before clark decided he was a democrat<<<

[KG]

15. award? heck yeah! i think i'll give myself 5 smilies!

:) :) :) :) :)

[robbedvoter]

7. Aw! FAIR will have to look under another rock now!

s'OK. Credibility is not an issue when one wants to believe (just see bushco & WMD)