Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush approved, then scratched plan to influence Iraq vote

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
tocqueville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 05:24 PM
Original message
Bush approved, then scratched plan to influence Iraq vote
2 hours, 11 minutes ago


NEW YORK (AFP) - President George W. Bush approved a covert plan to influence the outcome of Iraq's January 2005 election, but dropped it amid opposition from the US Congress, according to a report.

After debate within the White House, "the president's national security team recommended that he sign a secret, formal authorization for covert action to influence the election," the New York Times said, citing "a dozen current and former government officials" familiar with the discussions.

"Bush either had already signed it or was about to when objections were raised in Congress. Ultimately, he rescinded the decision," the Times said.

All the sources spoke anonymously, except for Frederick Jones, spokesman for the National Security Council, who would not comment on whether a formal authorization ever existed.

"But there were concerns about efforts by outsiders to influence the outcome of the Iraqi elections, including money flowing from Iran," he was quoted as saying.

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/afp/20050717/wl_mideast_afp/usiraqvote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. US elections, on the other hand, were a whole different matter...
they wouldn't "fix" elections in the United States, would they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firefox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Isn't the head honcho a Kurd
Now how did the smallest of three groups accomplish that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. Besides, he was fresh off his influencing of American elections...

This man is nothing but a fraud.

:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. So he voted for it before he voted against it?
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy M Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think many must know they still did covert actions...
to influence the election. I will never believe it was otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knowbody0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. after he lost the debate, he did it anyway
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. Right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
8. George W Bush has a conscience? Since when?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wurzel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
9. Perhaps Iraq doesn't have a Supreme Court?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorbuddha Donating Member (822 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
10. Did he rescind the decision because it was unethical, immoral, and wrong?
Or because he feared getting caught?

This is the heart of so many questions about Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnInLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
11. There is a more complete report on one of the lefty blogs
that said the bushco reluctantly agreed not to influence any certain political CANDIDATES. When asked by a journalist if they had covertly tried to influence the election in favor of certain political PARTIES, the admin spokesman would not respond to that question!!

I'll see if I can find that blog if anyone is interested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnInLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
12. Here it is....a little different from my memory of it..
www.dailykos.com

In the months before the Iraqi elections in January, President Bush approved a plan to provide covert support to certain Iraqi candidates and political parties, but rescinded the proposal because of Congressional opposition, current and former government officials said Saturday.

In a statement issued in response to questions about a report in the next issue of The New Yorker, Frederick Jones, the spokesman for the National Security Council, said that "in the final analysis, the president determined and the United States government adopted a policy that we would not try - and did not try - to influence the outcome of the Iraqi election by covertly helping individual candidates for office."

The statement appeared to leave open the question of whether any covert help was provided to parties favored by Washington, an issue about which the White House declined to elaborate.

The article, by Seymour M. Hersh, reports that the administration proceeded with the covert plan over the Congressional objections. Several senior Bush administration officials disputed that, although they recalled renewed discussions within the administration last fall about how the United States might counter what was seen as extensive Iranian support to pro-Iranian Shiite parties.

Free and fair elections, my ass.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
13. Wow. The RW machine is quick. Info to the contrary is on its way.
These fuckers will do anything to betray the truth.

It's astounding. We really are living in a corporacratic dictatorship. A fascism.

Wow. Just,...wow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I must ask the OP,...why are you spreading this information?
We have already been exposed to the forthcoming article detailing this administration's hand in manipulating Iraq's election.

Are you trying to prepare us? :shrug:

I find it just, mind-boggling, that this article is up on yahoo, at this moment.

:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 05:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC