REPUG logic: Even though Bush is corrupt, it'll be just like 72
I heard that tonight from a typical Repug. He said that this will be another McGovern election where Bush (Nixon) runs against an inept Dem and wins by default. He says corruption doesn't matter.
I reminded him that Watergate happened AFTER Nixon was re-elected. He sat there dumbfounded.
He was basically arguing that Nixon got reelected DESPITE of Watergate. I corrected him and he didn't know what to say. BTW, he's freaked by this Wilson thing, and Iraq, and the economy.
4. Sad but I think your friend may be right, and that you maybe
right. That is if many in our party had their way and NO I am not talking about Dean supporters or Clark supporters, but a certain indivdual(not Nader). Dems lose in 72 and that Bush resigns two years later. Then they let who ever the 08 Dem is... have it.. and another failed Carter like presidency coming after a unpopular war and a greatly damaged American psy.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.