Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

bushgang planning to take control of parts of space for military

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 12:08 PM
Original message
bushgang planning to take control of parts of space for military


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/06/08/wspace08.xml

The United States is planning to take control of parts of space and develop patrolling military aircraft in orbit as part of a revived Star Wars proposal for an American military empire above the ozone layer.

According to James Roche, the US Air Force Secretary, America's allies would have "no veto power" over projects designed to achieve American military control of space.

-snip-

The plans come after the successful use of global positioning satellites (GPS) and other space technology during the recent wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

The National Reconnaissance Office (NRO), the intelligence agency that is responsible for US spy satellites, is to develop a strategy that ensures America's allies, as well as its enemies, never gain access to the same space resources without Washington's permission. Recent proposals that have been circulated at Space Command and NRO briefings suggest that access to "near-earth space" may be refused to other nations.
-snip-
--------------------------

note the: "without Washington's permission."


the article ends by saying: President George W Bush's plans for a satellite-guided missile defence system have now largely been accepted.

it has? I didn't know that. did you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DCDemo Donating Member (847 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Never mind that this is contrary to signed treaties
Which are now law of the land. Sigh I miss the old US - you know the one that stood for the rule of law, worked for peace, and didn't torture and hold people in concentration camps (gitmo).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeahMira Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Sure, you can trust the government...
... ask any Indian.

Never mind that this is contrary to signed treaties...Which are now law of the land.

The U.S. signed a lot of treaties with the Indian nations and broke every one of them. Sorry, your comment about missing "the old U.S." just reminded me that the more things seem to change, the more they remain the same. Our allies are just today's Indian nations, I suppose.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Subject: keep digging donsu!
James Roche was president of Northrup Grumman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. Rumsfeld was brought in to restart Star Wars
Peter Teets presently serves as the director of the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO), undersecretary of the Air Force, and chief procurement officer for all of military space, controlling a budget in excess of $65 billion, a figure that includes $8 billion a year for missile defense and $7 billion annually for NRO spying. Teets, is the former president and chief operating officer of Lockheed Martin who retired from the company in late 1999.
http://portal.lobbyliberal.it/article/articleprint/271

To date, it is believed that the NRO has provided slightly more than $500 million each to Lockheed Martin and Boeing.
http://www.webnetarts.com/socialjustice/laertes.html

Teets is a firm believer in the conclusions of the Rumsfeld Commission's January 2001 report on the military in space, which warns of a "space Pearl Harbor" if the U.S. does not thoroughly dominate all aspects of space.
http://www.webnetarts.com/socialjustice/laertes.html

In addition, key lobbyists for Lockheed-Martin, Bruce Jackson, vice president of corporate strategy and development at Lockheed Martin and our intrepid flunky bungler, Stephen Hadley, played central roles in developing space policy for the U.S.
http://portal.lobbyliberal.it/article/articleprint/271

"I wrote the Republican Party's foreign policy platform," declared Jackson. His corporation has given over $391,000 to the Republican Party since 1998. Lockheed Martin vice- president Bruce Jackson, who served as chairman of the US Committee to Expand NATO along with Stephen Hadley, was overheard by one of the authors at an industry gathering bragging about how the industry's troubles will be over if GWBush was elected.
http://www.webnetarts.com/socialjustice/laertes.html

“Space is going to be important. It has a great feature in the military,” Stephen Hadley, introduced as “an advisor to Governor George W. Bush,” told the Air Force Association Convention in a speech September 11 in Washington. Hadley worked in the past for a law firm that represented Lockheed. Jackson and Hadley have worked closely together on the Committee to Expand NATO. Jackson was president of this entity, based in the Washington offices of the right-wing American Enterprise Institute; Hadley was its secretary. Hadley was also a member of the National Security Council staff during the earlier Bush administration.
http://www.liberationiraq.org/committee_officers.shtml#Bruce%20P.%20Jackson

More ominous was the establishment in the fall of 2002, of the Committee for the Liberation of Iraq (original website expunged)(Chairman of the Board, Bruce Jackson) which engaged in educational and advocacy efforts to mobilize US and international support for policies aimed at ending the regime of Saddam Hussein. This came at the same time that Stephan Hadley and Condi Rice were engaged in a series of briefings of foreign policy groups, Iraq specialists and other opinion makers that was described as a "new phase," by a White House spokesman, who described the goal as building fresh public support for Bush administration policy vs. Iraq.
November 2002 Article- http://www.wsws.org/articles/2002/nov2002/iraq-n23.shtml

Alternet Article
http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=14547


Here's the full report that Rumsfeld engineered to pull the nation back into the space weaponry buisness.
http://www.space.gov/docs/fullreport.pdf

Notice the other names, like 'Reconstruction' General Jay Garner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. Kucinich has been talking about the militarization of space for a while
and Democrats here mock him for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElementaryPenguin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. That's it!! Rise up, people!! These fuckers have to be ousted now!!!
What are we doing?? They can't take 280 million people!!! What exactly are we waiting for??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. This is designed for first strike anywhere on earth within minutes.
Not knowing if you will be vaporized in the blink of an eye will make the world's leaders either fall in step with Bush, or fight him to the death.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC