Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYPD & NY FBI Say Credible Threat; Feds Deny It > Was Bush Going to LIHOP?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 08:57 AM
Original message
NYPD & NY FBI Say Credible Threat; Feds Deny It > Was Bush Going to LIHOP?
Edited on Fri Oct-07-05 09:06 AM by Stephanie

There are only two options. Bloomberg is wrong or DHS is wrong.

Is Bloomberg hyping the threat to help him in the upcoming mayoral election? He chickened out of a debate with Ferrer last night. Is he using this as a distraction?

OR

Is the threat real, but BushCO is in such deep shit they thought they'd just let this one slide, like they did the first time. "LIHOP 2"

They hate New York. They wouldn't mind if a few of us got blown up again, if it helped George's poll numbers and distracted from all the scandals.

So which is it? Who do you believe?

I walked to work today, just in case.




NYC Commuters Head to Work Despite Threat

<snip>

The New York Police Department boosted existing measures to search for bombs in commuters' bags, brief cases and luggage. The threat also involved the possibility that terrorists would pack a baby stroller with a bomb, a law enforcement official said, speaking on condition of anonymity because the investigation is ongoing.

The official said the threat was "specific to place," and that the window for the attack was anywhere from Friday through at least the weekend.

In Washington, Homeland Security Department spokesman Russ Knocke said "the intelligence community has concluded this information to be of doubtful credibility. We shared this information early on with state and local authorities in New York." Knocke did not elaborate.

A counterterror official, who was briefed about the threat by Homeland Security authorities and spoke on condition of anonymity, said the intelligence did not reflect "on-the-ground, detailed, re-surveillance" methods consistent with credible information. Rather, the official said, the intelligence was similar to "what can be found on the Internet and a map of New York City."

The law enforcement official in New York said that city officials had known about the threat at least since Monday, but held the information until two or three al-Qaida operatives were arrested in Iraq within the past 24 hours. Once the arrests were made, officials felt they could go public, the official said.

Those arrested had received explosives training in Afghanistan, the same official said Friday. They had planned to travel through Syria to New York, and then meet with an unspecified number of operatives to carry out the bombings.

<more>

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051007/ap_on_re_us/nyc_subway;_ylt=Ar7g8ISmWScKWB3dpWw2xDCs0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA2Z2szazkxBHNlYwN0bQ--







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sasquatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. "LIHOP"?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tgnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Let It Happen on Purpose
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Let It Happen On Purpose
one possible scenerio of what actually happened on 9/11/01
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blitzen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. Third option: coordinated BS
BushCo is behind the alert, but denies it so that it looks like a legit (non-political) alert
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. That's got my vote for the moment. A true LIHOP would cost
Edited on Fri Oct-07-05 09:08 AM by GreenPartyVoter
a lot of money that they don't have. (Not that old SilverSpoon would care about that.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. When did they ever worry about money we don't have?
They're letting our grandkids pay for everything now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. Because people are starting to get really mad about money matters
in this country. If the anger over the money outweighs the fear of the terra event, they haven't gained a thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Could be. Especially after Bush referred in his "speech" yesterday
to the attacks that they had foiled since 9/11. Then again, maybe Bush just didn't want Bloomberg stealing his thunder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Exit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
35. BINGO!!!!
His minions must be reading the net--scorn is being heaped on his wolf-crying, so he's sheepishly passing the blame onto Bloomberg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. To the GOP, NYC is a bigger sin palace than New Orleans
And it's virtually ALL democrats. What harm would a little tube explosion do if it helps The Party, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dretceterini Donating Member (329 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. I think the story
is a Bushco plant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. As James Baker said, "Fuck the Jews, they don't vote for us anyway."
Same goes for the city.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whatever4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #3
15. I agree with that
Plus, I can see that the locals would be a little more reluctant to allow a few (few hundred, few thousand) people to die just so this admin can convince us of the terror threat, to convince us to "follow".

I know that New York set up it's OWN counter-terrorism effort, and they're QUITE serious about it. It's well funded and they have a will to stop further attacks from ANYONE. I think, maybe, they're not playing along, and do not work and play well with the feds.

I think NY caught onto a plan of the feds, and busted it, probably went to the media, and THANK GOD the media took it up. That's my very humble, but stubborn, opinion.

Thank you media people. Even if it's just 6 men that own it all. Thank you for changing your minds, no matter what your motivations were. Thank you for not wanting to see most of us dead, us ordinary Americans everywhere. We appreciate it. We'll even keep watching, if you keep doing that truth stuff. Promise. Swear. Swear on my life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kota Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
11. I think homeland security was gonna call a terror threat when
the indictments came down, New York beat them to it.Or they just wanted to be the ones to declare it and get credit, so now its not credible and neither is the FBI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #11
34. Or maybe...
Bushco got Bloomberg to call it so that it wouldn't look like a Washington smoke screen over the indictments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. Bloomberg is an absolute whore for Bush so that's a possiblity
But why would DHS downplay it? That's what I still don't get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunny planet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. Actually Bloomberg is pretty pissed off at * because of the way he
reneged on most of the money promised to NYC after 9/11 and the way the Homeland Security funding was set up. Wyoming, with six people besides Darth Cheney gets the same amount of terra protection money allocated as the 9 million citizens of NYC. Bloomberg never misses a chance to point that out. I don't think he likes Jr. all that much. The idea that Bloomie decided to take the wind out of *'s terror sails,alerting the public earlier, when * planned to have this announced same day as indictments, makes sense to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. Could be right
I'm still pissed about how he handed over the city to the bush re-coronation convention last summer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #36
41. They must be out of the loop on the politics of terrorism.
Maybe there is a slight threat. Dept of Homeland Security knows there is not a significant threat. Bush gets Bloomie to push the severity of the threat as cover for the indictments that might be handed down soon.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
12. Feds: "Not credible, yet."
They only decide if something's credible after shit starts blowing up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #12
21. This is the first time I remember them DENYING a threat was credible
It's usually the other way around. The only time they've done it before was in hindsight, when they said the August 6 PDB did not alarm them, that it was "historical in nature."

I have convinced myself they were going to LIHOP us again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. It's not a matter of if, but when.
Nothing worries me more than seeing these people backed into a corner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #22
30. I just wish they'd pick on somebody else for a change
We're exhausted in NYC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. You guys are the liberal hotbed.
It's everything they hate...multicultural, Democratic, hedonistic, undeniably superior to other cities. Just listen to Ann Coulter talk about New York like it's freaking Nazi Berlin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. And yet I think she lives here!
If it was really an Al Queda threat, don't you think they would have figured out by now that we hate Bush too? If it's BushCO fucking with us then of course they go for NY. But Al Queda? Why don't they mess with TX instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. Exactly.
Nothing "Al Qaeda" does ever makes any sense unless you look at them as a means to an end for the neocon agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunny planet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
37. Maybe the BFEE wants us to stop taking security alerts seriously so
we will be taken off guard again if and when an attack happens again. I'm a New Yorker, don't trust a thing Bushco. says.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
13. Yep, Fuckstick needs another LIHOP to boost his ratings
He realizes that when the people aren't afraid, they realize what a fucking useless fuckstick he is.

I'll trust the word of the NYPD and the NY FBI over fuckstick's people any day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. That's what I'm thinking
And I talked to a cop last night who told me NYPD has intel units in every major city.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tlsmith1963 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #13
26. When I'm Afraid...
...I *still* think Bush is useless. What is he going to do about that?

Tammy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buff2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
16. Just like all the other "threats",it's political
Repukes are in deep trouble and the threat of an attack gets the news off of their troubles and back on scaring the sheep.They are all using this to pull themselves out of the hole they've gotten themselves into. Bu$h is the ring leader in this,it's just too much of a coincidence that this boogie man threat pops up just hours after his terra speech. Keith Olberman said this has happened THIRTEEN times and it has him mighty suspicious of this as well. These bastards will do ANYTHING to cover their asses. ANYTHING. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Doesn't explain why DHS is pooh-poohing it
If anything Chertoff would be hyping this. Unless they thought a hit would be better for them than a mere threat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bklyncowgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #18
25. Maybe DHS is out of the loop. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brainshrub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
19. I'm willing to give Bloomburg the benefit of the doubt.
It's not like he's done this a whole lot. Better to err on the side of caution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
20. I'm glad you walked to work
I hope all New Yorkers follow your example! Even if this is a hoax. I want all of you to remain safe!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
23. More like Bloomberg making some political hay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlGore-08.com Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
24. A similar thing happened out here in Cali when Gray Davis was still Gov.
Davis publicly announced a credible threat to bridges and ports in the state (if I remember right) and DHS publicly dissed him, called the intel bogus.

At the time I thought it was part of their campaign to kneecap Davis (they spent an awful lot of time and effort denying him fed services and money so that the next GOPer who ran for Gov. would have an automatic platform), but now I think it's just that they're so freaking arrogant that they don't believe anybody but them can be trusted to figure out what's a credible threat and what isn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bklyncowgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
27. Bloomberg screwed up their timing--or maybe they're just screwups
Let's say the intelligence services knew that this terror cell was planning to bomb the NYC subway and that Bushco was planning make a heroic series of arrests right before the whole thing went down to boost his ratings or if worse came to worse and the attack happened he could play the hero again and revive the war on terror--not to mention his poll ratings.

Hell it's only New Yorkers.

Bloomberg's maybe a little less willing to let a few hundred innocent registered NYC voters die so that Bush can be a hero and so's the NY FBI office. Bloomberg orders the NYPD into action. DHS says "What terrorist threat" They look like idiots.

As for DHS, I believe that that if this scenario is correct, they were out of the loop.

The other possibility is that DHS is just incompetent.

Incompetent or evil? That's always the question with this gang.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. Well DHS was aware but says not credible
It just doesn't make sense for BushCO to downplay this. They hype every threat. Unless they thought it was time for another LIHOP. This is what's making the most sense to me right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bklyncowgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. LIHOP makes sense to me too but so does incompetence.
What's interesting is that Bloomberg may have blown the whole thing. With the NYPD on alert, it's pretty unlikely that any attack is going to happen and the conspirators--if they exist--have probably scattered by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jumptheshadow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
39. Another option
Edited on Fri Oct-07-05 12:45 PM by jumptheshadow
Perhaps the NY cops cross-indexed information from the Feds with data they have but aren't sharing. Perhaps they don't trust the Feds.

Believe me, the cops were serious today.

I am in agreement with everybody else who trusts New York's intelligence much more than anything that comes down from the Bush administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. a cop friend told me NYPD has intel units all over the world
in every major city. and yeah, he was taking this one seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YouthInAsia Donating Member (806 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
42. WAAAAAY too coincidental for me. Bu$h just HAPPENS to have
his little terrorist speech today in an effort to rescare the american sheep into following him blindly and on the SAME DAY as this pathetic speech, there's a "highly credible threat" in, where else, NYC. I dont belive it for one szecond. Nor, however, do I doubt that these scum in our own govt would blow up a few subway stations THEMSELVES in order to get the Sheep back in tow. Bu$h is desperate. And the ONLY thing he has been able to rely on over the last 5 years has been his ability to scare people with threats of terrorism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
holeinthedonut Donating Member (18 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
44. Terrorist won't do anything right now, we killing ourselves
why on earth would they give George another Cause Celebre' behind which he can herd the scared masses? They do anything, George calls his scared masses back behind his protection sheild and he goes on doing his thing while the hypercrite kool-aid drinkers hold him on a pedestal.

They stay on the downlow and Bush co, falls into a pile of lies and deceit and corruption and greed and averice and hubris and other stuff.

Terrorist are not as stupid as the average american.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
45. TORO TURD!!!
...Homeland Security officials in Washington said the threat was of "doubtful credibility."

...(C)ity officials had known about the threat at least since Monday, but held the information until two or three al-Qaida operatives were arrested in Iraq within the past 24 hours. Once the arrests were made, officials felt they could go public...


But why go public with information that DHS told you wasn't credible, Mayor Bloomberg? To give President Potty Stop a "weapon of mass distraction" from his poorly received speech and Karl Rove's new legal probems? Or to give yourself a "legitimate" excuse for backing out of that debate in Harlem?

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. LOL! President Potty Stop....
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jumptheshadow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. I repeat
The NY Police have a better intelligence unit than the Feds.

And perhaps they aren't sharing information with the Feds because, frankly, they don't trust them and they think they are a pack of incompetents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC