|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Rosco T. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 03:30 PM Original message |
I'm getting a feeling that Fitz may throw a bigger bombshell than.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenPartyVoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 03:31 PM Response to Original message |
1. Hope you are right! Hope to God something comes of all this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newscott (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 03:37 PM Response to Original message |
2. This would be easily resolved if Congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tk2kewl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 03:39 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. he might get pardoned if the repuke congress forced him out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiFascist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 03:57 PM Response to Reply #4 |
21. Interesting theory! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tk2kewl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 04:03 PM Response to Reply #21 |
25. that's assuming dickie doesn't step down before 07 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tk2kewl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 03:38 PM Response to Original message |
3. is this why Specter had wanted bush to hold off on the 2nd nominee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jedicord (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 03:41 PM Response to Original message |
5. Thanks to the Repubs in the 90's, a precedent has been set |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OldLeftieLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 03:44 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Who indicted Clinton? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 03:50 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. civil suit vs criminal inditement is like perjury vs court sanction for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OldLeftieLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 03:53 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. Oh, dear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 03:56 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. Question for you about your opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OldLeftieLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 04:00 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. It's been debated for years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 04:08 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. I've read up on Jaworski and understand his reasoning for urging |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OldLeftieLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 04:12 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. It would be prudent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 04:13 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. True enough, but why an internet message board |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OldLeftieLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 04:21 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. Well, since there are other real and vital |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 04:34 PM Response to Reply #30 |
35. Well, that's your opinion and you're entitled to it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
King Coal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 06:32 PM Response to Reply #35 |
55. Walt, OldLeftie may be entitled to her opinion, but not her own facts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Samantha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 09:24 PM Response to Reply #35 |
69. "Indict" refers to criminal charges |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
King Coal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 06:34 PM Original message |
Trite? What in the hotel bill is trite about it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OldLeftieLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 07:11 PM Response to Original message |
64. Trite, because every applicant to law school |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 07:49 PM Response to Reply #64 |
66. So where was I claiming my DU post was an application to law school? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
King Coal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-20-05 09:17 AM Response to Reply #66 |
77. I don't know Walt. But |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IntravenousDemilo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 06:14 PM Response to Reply #28 |
51. If the SCOTUS can raise him up into office, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 06:31 PM Response to Reply #28 |
54. "earthshattering legal rulings" - Like giving the election to the loser? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 05:11 PM Response to Reply #23 |
44. Don't you think any departure from the neocon "status quo" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 05:57 PM Response to Reply #44 |
49. Deleted message |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 06:51 PM Response to Reply #49 |
60. Nobody with any sense wants to tempt Providence, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Samantha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 09:16 PM Response to Reply #20 |
68. I don't think the waters are murky - you cannot indict a sitting President |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 06:29 PM Response to Reply #16 |
53. True - I used Rush and Fox as "media" - my error - and I will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OldLeftieLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-20-05 02:39 PM Response to Reply #53 |
78. You got your message across - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jedicord (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 04:55 PM Response to Reply #7 |
40. He wasn't indicted, but the Supreme Court ruled it was OK to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OldLeftieLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 05:00 PM Response to Reply #40 |
42. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 07:51 PM Response to Reply #42 |
67. There's a good reason the answer is "no" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 03:46 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Clinton was never indicted. There is no precedent either way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tk2kewl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 03:48 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. clinton was forced t testify in the civil suit however |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OldLeftieLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 04:50 PM Response to Reply #10 |
38. Uh, not likely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 06:34 PM Response to Reply #38 |
57. Husband is suing??????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jedicord (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 04:59 PM Response to Reply #9 |
41. Are you sure? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OldLeftieLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 03:43 PM Response to Original message |
6. Feelings don't bring indictments |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlCzervik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 03:45 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. I was reading in the wapost that he won't be putting out a final report |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OldLeftieLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 03:52 PM Response to Reply #8 |
14. The first part is the law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlCzervik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 03:54 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. See thats why i got to you, 1st you hook me up with some great |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OldLeftieLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 03:55 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. HAHAHAHA! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlCzervik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 04:00 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. yes it works very well, now my family can actually be around me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OldLeftieLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 04:01 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. Between you and me, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carni (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 04:15 PM Response to Reply #14 |
29. If the second scenario happens that will suck BIG TIME :( eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OldLeftieLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 04:21 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. Be prepared |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
klook (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 04:39 PM Response to Reply #14 |
37. Yep, I heard this explained on NPR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OldLeftieLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 05:03 PM Response to Reply #37 |
43. WOW! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robertpaulsen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 03:50 PM Response to Original message |
11. Good question about Roberts! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robertpaulsen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 03:53 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. Here's more info on what I think is the precedent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hang a left (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 09:57 PM Response to Reply #11 |
75. Hi rp |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 03:50 PM Response to Original message |
13. I AM WITH YOU ON THAT... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud patriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 03:55 PM Response to Original message |
18. um, this question assumes there is talent in the WH now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
31. The bombshell will be no indictments |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SupplyConcerns (305 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 06:24 PM Response to Reply #31 |
52. I disagree, but we're getting way ahead of ourselves here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
senaca (173 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 06:43 PM Response to Reply #52 |
59. Plame, Winning 2006 and DSM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AbbyR (734 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 04:27 PM Response to Original message |
33. I sure hope you're right... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatever4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 04:33 PM Response to Original message |
34. I mean, really |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
journalist3072 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 04:35 PM Response to Original message |
36. Fitz is taking his time for a reason... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 05:16 PM Response to Reply #36 |
45. And making them sweat is no bad thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
journalist3072 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 05:30 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. Exactly!!!!! eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tight_rope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 09:31 PM Response to Reply #36 |
70. Maybe that's why Cheney bought a house in Maryland.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
journalist3072 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 09:50 PM Response to Reply #70 |
74. He bought a house in MD? eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovuian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 04:52 PM Response to Original message |
39. The Magna Carta of 12 15 states No king is above the law!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 09:45 PM Response to Reply #39 |
73. Is the Magna Carta part of the US Constitution or the US Code??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreedomAngel82 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 05:36 PM Response to Original message |
47. I think so too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
many a good man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 05:41 PM Response to Original message |
48. Bush v Gore 5-4 becomes US v Bush 4-4 ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 06:53 PM Response to Reply #48 |
61. Well, if that's the case, wouldn't Mieirs have to recuse too?... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 06:01 PM Response to Original message |
50. Yes a conxittiutional crisis IS coming |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cynatnite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
56. Perjury and obstruction of justice seems rather tame... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notadmblnd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 06:34 PM Response to Original message |
58. nah, I'm seeing the Dems taking back the house and or the senate in 2006 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 06:55 PM Response to Reply #58 |
62. The key is for the Dems to hopefully not allow an unimpeachable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notadmblnd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 06:57 PM Response to Reply #62 |
63. That's why I won't be bitching if he selects his girlfriend Condi. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevietheman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 07:15 PM Response to Original message |
65. Just saw the Judicary committee heads say Miers confirmation... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 09:36 PM Response to Original message |
71. I have thought all along that a case for wartime treason by the whole WH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tight_rope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 09:42 PM Response to Original message |
72. I'm with you on this one...I had my doubts but too much has come to light! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
corbett (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-05 10:44 PM Response to Original message |
76. I Don't Dare Hope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:00 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC