Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cheney aide passed Plame's name to Libby, Hadley.....Developing...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
truthpusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 11:51 AM
Original message
Cheney aide passed Plame's name to Libby, Hadley.....Developing...
Edited on Mon Oct-24-05 11:51 AM by truthpusher
http://rawstory.com/

headline from Rawstory

Cheney aide passed Plame's name to Libby, Hadley, those near inquiry say: Developing...

will post more when available...

limk: http://rawstory.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Would that be Hannah?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ok, I'll speculate...
What if it's Matlin? There was plenty of chatter about the info on Plame coming from the press -She certainly has a press aura about her, but she WAS working in Cheney's office.

It might explain the meltdown btwn Carville and Novak, too :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. Also...Matalin has been NOWHERE to be found in the last year...
Has anyone even spotted her lately?

Also, Carville isn't on the national media as much, is he? It would be very difficult to discuss political matters when your wife sits in the eye of a storm, wouldn't it?

If she was involved, I think she would sing like a bird--very easily. She's a conservative, but she's also married to a flaming liberal. She understands the game. She understands that both sides are full of it--to some extent. I think she'd select honesty and integrity (and saving her own ass) over furthering some fascist agenda.

Interesting to speculate about her...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #13
36. She was on Imus just last week claiming that the scandal years are
over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. I have wondered about Matlin for months! She was on AF1, right?
And hasn't she testified to the GJ? I think she (and therefore Carville, one can assume) knew Novracula's role in this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. As I predicted (Hannah):
Edited on Mon Oct-24-05 12:04 PM by jsamuel
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=5100272

There was one person who was both with Bolton, who requested CIA agents names around that time of the outing, and the WHIG group (Cheney's group). It was John Hannah. So, I believe that Hannah is the connection for why they told the press "Plame" instead of "Wilson" as he knew "Plame" from his boss Bolton and then told the WHIG group about "Plame" being her undercover name. If Hannah has indeed flipped, then that means that he knows enough to take both Bolton and Cheney down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsKandice01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Bolton AND Cheney going down??
Oh my!!!! This is super duper special Fitzmas!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
32. oh, they say it wasn't Hannah...
hmmm... I wonder if this gets Bolton off the hook then...

unless Hannah also heard it from Bolton... hmmm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. Good article. It puts things in perspective.
We'll see. It's been a long wait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shantipriya Donating Member (367 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. Hannah
Does this mean Libby and Rove are off the hook? I hope not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnfunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. Gee, Mommy! Gee, Daddy! It's gonna be an EXTRA special Fitzmas this year!
Edited on Mon Oct-24-05 12:13 PM by johnfunk
To the tune of "We need a Little Christmas"
Music by Jerry Herman
New Lyrics by John Funk


Haul out the lawyers!
Enjoy the fun, we know the Bush Gang's going down!
File the indictments!
We never rush these things, so start to make arrests right now!


For we need a little Fitzmas
Right this very minute.
Breaking news on cable:
Bush is neck-deep in it!


Yes, we need a little Fitzmas
Right this very minute.
Can't wait to see Dick Cheney's fury.
Oh Patrick, dear, we're in a hurry!


Serve all the bad guys
Papers in light blue covers 'til they're gone.
Slap on the handcuffs.
It's time we saw a frog march on the White House lawn.


For we need a little Fitzmas,
Need a little laughter
Need a little singing
Karl Rove in the slammer
And we need to make our nation
Happy ever after
We need a little Fitzmas now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. That's heartwarming!
Edited on Mon Oct-24-05 12:32 PM by LiberalEsto
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cmd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
23. Love it
That always was my favorite carol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. Wurmser?
Didn't they say Wurmser flipped?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsKandice01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I can't read that name
Without thinking of Revenge of the Nerds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
33. I WIN!
hah!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
11. Developing
Yay!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dubyaD40web Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Hard
Yay!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
12. Where does Rove fit into all of this?
I hope that pig doesn't slip by this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Rove will get a pass on the leak
but be indicted on Perjury, obstruction and lying to a Grand Jury.

My suspicion is that he passed on data that he should not have had, but mught legitimately claim that he was not aware. In this particular case, ignorance of the fact that it was classified gives you a pass. That is the way the statute is writeen.

Unfortunately, with the other charges, bush can argue that its simply politics on the cover-up charges and that He trusts Rove.

That quite honestly if fine by me,,,,,let Karl stay around and let him be a lightening rod for the right and the left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
16. John Hannah looks to be the next John Dean
Which is what the prosecutor really needs - the insider who has turned and is telling all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
18. STORY UP!!!! Here's the line that I like best:
http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Cheney_aide_passed_Plames_name_to_1024.html
<SNIP>
"Within a week, Wurmser, on orders from "executives in the office of the vice president," was told to leak her name to a specific group of reporters in an effort to muzzle her husband, Wilson, who had become a thorn in the side of the administration, those close to the inquiry say."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Let's not overlook these two gems:
<snip>
"Although the CIA documents that Wurmser and his staff poured over never showed Iraq as being an immediate threat, Wurmser was dead set on finding and presenting evidence to Vice President Dick Cheney that suggested as much even if the veracity of such intelligence was questionable. Wurmser had met with now discredited Iraqi exiles who were part of the Iraqi National Congress, headed by Ahmed Chalabi, the infamous single source of Judith Miller's explosive columns published in the New York Times that said Iraq was acquiring nuclear bomb components, who is now the Deputy Prime Minister of Iraq, sources close the probe said.

With the help of Chalabi, and the White House Iraq Group, Wurmser helped Cheney's office, particularly the vice president's chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, build a case for war. Wurmser frequently met with Cheney, Libby, Feith and Richard Perle, the former head of the Defense Policy Board, to go over the "evidence" of the threat posed by Saddam Hussein that could then be used by the White House to build public support for the Iraq war. Wurmser routinely butted heads with the CIA over the veracity of the intelligence he was providing to Cheney's office, sources close the investigation said."

Great article, Rawstory!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. I'm sorry this doesn't make sense even though it trys too!!!
Edited on Mon Oct-24-05 01:09 PM by lovuian
It talks NOTHING about Air Force One where Colin Powell had Plame's file!!! I think Cheney found out there!!!

This is a smokescreen!!!

Yes Wurmser was involved but Rove called Cooper and Libby called Judith!!!

so lets get it straight this guys knew and I'm thinking this is trying to get away from Cheney!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnfunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. You're sorta right, but the key detail...
..is that Wurmser was instructed to do the leaking! And, like the good WHIG/PNAC/Neofascicon he was, he followed orders.

Fork. Done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. Cheney wasn't on Air Force One.
He flies on Air Force Two. The other story was crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. I don't think that matters.
They're in direct communication regarless of their location. I'm sure there are cameras and tv screens that allow them communication as though they were in the same room.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #29
35. It matters to the story in question.
The story the user referenced refered to Powell showing Cheney while on Air Force One. Cheney was not on Air Force One. Ergo, that story is false. Now, I'm fairly certain that there was coordination between Cheney and his lieutenants on this. But the rumor that Power cued Cheney in from a few days ago is apparently false.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. Yes, I read that story, but..
But that wording does not exclude Cheney being on Air Force 2, or even in the White House. I believe that other story was true, even though they don't fly together.
I see Powell and Bush discussing it with Cheney over a live video link. You know they must have that. It's as though the pres and the vp are in virtual contact at all times.
I'm saying that Cheney was "virtually" on AF 1.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #20
31. No. I don't understand the reasoning now behing the big deal
of the memo on AF1. I think that has been the smokescreen. The bottom line is they knew back in June. This actually nails Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Wurmser was told to leak her name...Ding, Ding! We have a winner!
Johnny, tell him what he's won!

That would be an all expense paid vacation to the South Arlington minimum security facility, transfers included!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnfunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Gives a whole new meaning to the phrase,...
"The 'Wurm' Has Turned!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. This could mean that the only crime was in the cover up.
It's plausible that they were just really sloppy rather than willfully criminal.

But then they committed crimes to cover up the politically embarrassing truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. That's good enough for me. It was good enough to get Nixon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #18
28. Condisleeza, Condisleeza, Wurm has blamed you...
Libby then shared the information with Karl Rove, President Bush's deputy chief of staff, the sources said. Wurmser also passed on the same information about Wilson and his CIA to Deputy National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley and Security Adviser Condoleeza Rice, they added.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
30. Well I guess ** was wrong when he said "we might never find
the leaker". :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
34. "executives in the office of the vice president,"
Ummm, how many "executives" are there in that office. I'm thinking, maybe, ONE?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
37. What did the vice president know, and when did he know it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC