I think the religious right wanted Harriet.
The neocons did not find her to be intellectually qualified to be their standard bearer for who knows what they have up their sleeves. But I bet it goes far beyond Roe v. Wade.
The neocons won.
This is worth remembering because this is where the power in the conservative movement resides. Shrubco will come and go, the neocons will remain and we cannot rest on our laurels.
I think the neocons pay lip service to social issues but their goal is global and geopolitical. They have bigger fish to fry. Look at how strongly the neocons came out against Harriet- and stop and consider how much power they wield.
Their opinions were all over talk shows and the WaPO. These unelected pundits sure have a disproportionate amount of power don't they?
.........
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/06/AR2005100601468.html Withdraw This Nominee
By Charles Krauthammer
Friday, October 7, 2005; Page A23
By choosing a nominee suggested by Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid and well known only to himself, the president has ducked a fight on the most important domestic question dividing liberals from conservatives: the principles by which one should read and interpret the Constitution. For a presidency marked by a courageous willingness to think and do big things, this nomination is a sorry retreat into smallness.
.........
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/06/AR2005100602069.htmlRight Sees Miers as Threat to a Dream
By Dan Balz
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, October 7, 2005; Page A01
"No one has anything against her," said William Kristol, editor of the Weekly Standard and one of the first conservatives to register his disappointment. "But the idea that one is supposed to sacrifice both intellectual distinction and philosophical clarity at the same time is just ridiculous."