Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Assuming Fitz did get indictments, shouldn't we expect a lawyer

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 01:59 PM
Original message
Assuming Fitz did get indictments, shouldn't we expect a lawyer
to pop up giving an interview in order to put his/her defendent's spin on the story before the prosecutor gets a chancve?

Isn't PR conventional wisdom to get out in front of the story to control its spin?

Is this story just to big to spin?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. they've been spinning it for 2 years already
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think the lawyers are still negotiating
at least some of them are. So of course they aren't going to do anything to make Fitzgerald mad. And the others-well, they know there's an indictment, but they probably aren't sure just what Fitz knows yet (especially if he's negotiating with others), and they are forced to wait to know what to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. All the "leaks" we've heard so far are most likely from BushCo lawyers
That's why we should all be very careful believing everything we hear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yes, they like to get out in front of a story, but in this case,
Fitz is being so good a being leakproof, they don't know what story to get in front of!

I'm sure they've been playing "what if" scenarios behind closed doors, and have a lot of options ready, but I don't think you're going to see them out first. They just don't know enough to do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. Where do you think all those "leaks" are coming from? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yes, but none has acknowledged recieving an indictment
wouldn't they want to try to take control of the meaning of the indictment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Not if they're working on a plea deal. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. If the indictments are sealed, they can't do that.
Which would make an excellent argument for sealing the indictments, by the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. SO the indicted don't get told that they are indicted?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
10. They can't play their hands.
Make no mistake; Fitz is playing poker here. He's misdirecting. He's leading them down false paths. He's not telling them anything he doesn't have to. His hand is well hidden. They don't know whether to raise, call, or fold. I don't think bluffing Fitz will work too well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC