Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senator Seeks to Defer Probe of CIA Prison Leak-WAPO

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 08:19 AM
Original message
Senator Seeks to Defer Probe of CIA Prison Leak-WAPO
washingtonpost.com
Senator Seeks to Defer Probe of CIA Prison Leak

By Jonathan Weisman Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, November 10, 2005; A04

The chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence told Senate leaders yesterday that Congress should hold off on a probe of the disclosure of classified information on secret prisons to The Washington Post until the Justice Department completes its own inquiry.

Sen. Pat Roberts (R-Kan.) said he will "respectfully" request that Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.) back off a strongly worded request that a bicameral investigation into the disclosure be convened immediately. Frist spokeswoman Amy Call said the majority leader had not decided how to respond. "He always takes what his chairmen say into consideration," she said.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/09/AR2005110901976_pf.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
atommom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. SHUT UP, PAT!
There's no way this can be properly investigated if he's involved. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. Roberts is such a tool
That's a good boy Roberts, give you're buddy Frist an excuse to cover his bare ass.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
3. Well sure, there was a Con involved.
No need for a messy old investigation! Save those for Democratic Party wrongdoing. IOKIYAR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
4. You bet--Once Trent Lott spilled the beans that most of info came from
the GOP meeting with Cheney lunchean--it was over!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Here is the Frist/Hasturd letter.


http://rawstory.com/news/2005/LEAKED_Draft_letter_prepared_to_call_1108.html

Letter calls for inquiry into Washington Post story on CIA jails

John Byrne


Senior Republicans are pushing for an investigation into who revealed the existence of secret CIA prisons overseas for "high-value" al Qaeda suspects to the Washington Post, RAW STORY can confirm.

The Post reported on the existence of secret U.S. prisons in Eastern Europe Nov 2. The Bush administration has not commented on the report.

The letter follows.


November 8, 2005

Honorable Peter Hoekstra
Chairman
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence
United States House of Representatives
Washington, D.C. 20515

Honorable Pat Roberts
Chairman
Select Committee on Intelligence
United States Senate
Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Chairman Hoekstra and Chairman Roberts:

We request that you immediately initiate a joint investigation into the possible release of classified information to the media alleging that the United States government may be detaining and interrogating terrorists at undisclosed locations abroad. As you know, if accurate, such an egregious disclosure could have long-term and far-reaching damaging and dangerous consequences, and will imperil our efforts to protect the American people and our homeland from terrorist attacks.

The purpose of your investigation will be to determine the following: was the information provided to the media classified and accurate?; who leaked this information and under what authority?; and, what is the actual and potential damage done to the national security of the United States and our partners in the Global War on Terror? We will consider other changes to this mandate based on your recommendations.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
5. "Uh, fellas...? I'm the leak. So, let's just chill...
...and have Trent Lott's legs broken."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. "Asked how long that (Justice invest.) could take, Roberts joked,


......The CIA general counsel's office also has notified the Justice Department that a release of classified information took place in connection with The Post's report. After the CIA details what it sees as the damage done by the article, Justice prosecutors will determine whether a criminal investigation is warranted.

Asked how long that could take, Roberts joked, "Decades," indicating he is in no rush to convene his own inquiry. Hoekstra said he has not decided how to proceed.

After months of partisan charges over the White House release of CIA operative Valerie Plame's name and false information on Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, disclosure of classified information has become an issue among Republicans.

Hoekstra said some Republican lawmakers were livid when a top administration intelligence officer inadvertently released the annual budget for U.S. intelligence operations, a figure that is classified and closely held by lawmakers who draft the budget.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Roberts has no desire of EVER investigating!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
7. I'm looking forward to the Dems' response; seems to me the
toothpaste is already out of this tube!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. Lou Dobbs reported this last night. I have not seen a Dem. response yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
8. Oh, this is precious. Just precious.
I'm so SHOCKED!:eyes: They are so damn corrupt and it's become OBVIOUS to anyone who bothers to pay attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kevinmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
11. Republican's are going too need their own Cell Block n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
12. Ouch!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. they are also upset the somone released the secret 44 billion$ Intel


budget.

..After months of partisan charges over the White House release of CIA operative Valerie Plame's name and false information on Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, disclosure of classified information has become an issue among Republicans.

Hoekstra said some Republican lawmakers were livid when a top administration intelligence officer inadvertently released the annual budget for U.S. intelligence operations, a figure that is classified and closely held by lawmakers who draft the budget.

At an intelligence conference last week in San Antonio, Mary Margaret Graham, deputy director of national intelligence, said the annual intelligence budget is $44 billion, a slip witnessed and recounted by a U.S. News & World Report writer.

Keeping the figure secret was a contentious issue as Congress retooled the intelligence structure after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, said Hoekstra, who battled to maintain the budget figure's classification.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. So much info is keep secret!--even this Intel budget!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
16. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC