Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How many people does a weapon need to be designed to kill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 12:45 PM
Original message
How many people does a weapon need to be designed to kill
Edited on Thu Nov-10-05 12:46 PM by tk2kewl
in order to be considered a weapon of mass destruction?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. you notice how they never define their terms, too, eh?
Lets 'em be very loosey goosey with the language.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. those daisy cutters are pretty damn ugly...
don't they qualify? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. It has to be capable of scaring White people. (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kipling Donating Member (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. None! Hell, it doesn't even have to exist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. ... does it need to be delivered by manned and unmanned aerial vehicles?
:scared: :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mark11727 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'm not sure, but I think it has to do with how "controllable" it is...
...for example, to a certain degree, a bomb can be directed to detonate at a specific target. On the other hand, a chemical or biological weapon could disperse indiscriminately depending on the wind, and destroy much more than its intended target.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. so would one of those daisy cutter bombs just be a WVLD?
Weapon of Very Large Destruction :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'm still of the opinion that the only real weapon of mass destruction is
nuclear.

Chemical weapons do not cause mass destruction, under prime conditions they can cause mass death, but only if numerous munitions are used and under certain circumstances.

A nuclear weapon requires no particular environmental conditions to reach it's maximum efficacy, you detonate it, it blows up, things are destroyed and people die.

With a chemical weapon, numerous munitions are needed, a strong wind can effect the potency, rain can dilute it, being in a room with filtered air can block it. It may be a very nasty deadly weapon, but it's not a weapon of mass "destruction". Same for biological weapons for the most part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftHander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
9. Kill Ratio.....is used in weapons marketing...
Edited on Thu Nov-10-05 01:12 PM by LeftHander
The kill ratio is:

$ cost of weapon/# dead in use of weapon (or vice versa...)

I saw a advertisment from Honeywell when I I was a picture framer in Minneapolis. A lady brought in a proof of a two page ad for a torpepo made by honeywell. It was touting in big fonts the highest kill ratio at this price point. Either way the manfacturer touted this torpedo gave you more death for your dollar,

She saw my obvious disgust and she returned the ad to her bag and we conentrated on her needle point instead.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 02:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC