Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Shocking Videos Expose US Chemical Weapons use on Civilians

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
populistdriven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 01:10 PM
Original message
Shocking Videos Expose US Chemical Weapons use on Civilians
Edited on Thu Nov-10-05 01:11 PM by bushmeat
http://www.rainews24.rai.it/ran24/inchiesta/body.asp

This is an account of an American serviceman that was there:

"It just comes across the radio... In 5 mics we're going to drop some Whiskey Pete... Whiskey Pete thats the military slang for White Phosphorous... There is no question that White Phosphorous is a chemical weapon... This video proves that a chemical weapon was used in a massive and indiscriminate way on the population of Fallujah... In the days that followed US satellite shows Fallujah burnt out and destroyed to the ground... The gasses from the warhead, the white phosphorous disperses in a white cloud and when it makes contact with skin then its absolutely irreversible damage, burning uh, flesh to the bone. Um, it doesnt necessarily burn clothes, but it will burn the skin underneath clothes and this is why protective masks to not help it will burn through the rubber of the mask, it will manage to get inside your face. If you breath it it will blister your throat and your lungs till you suffocate, and then it will burn you from the inside. It basically reacts to skin, oxegen and water. The only way to stop the burning is with wet mud but, at that point its just impossible to stop... (have you seen the effects of these weapons?) yes, burned bodies, burned women and burned children, white phosphorous kills indiscriminately. Its a cloud that in most cases, to within 150 meters of impact, will disperse and will burn every, every human being or animal..."


http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article10907.htm

"White Phosphorus is supposed to be used to mark targets for aviation flying high over an objective area. And I know for a fact that no fixed-winged aviation was dropping ordnance in that area, it was too close to friendlies. I know this for a FACT. To see what I saw, not 1000 meters from where I was, in retrospect, is really frightening."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Whiskey Pete?
Did the military change call signs?

It was always Willy Pete.

Did I miss a memo?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
populistdriven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes, William, you are out of touch with current military callsigns
Edited on Thu Nov-10-05 01:33 PM by bushmeat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dewatson Donating Member (90 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Hey, I'm new and I saw a diary on this over at dailykos that
Edited on Thu Nov-10-05 01:31 PM by Dewatson
I would like to have someone start a new thread here, cuz I cannot.

It was up for a while but it only got a few recommendations before it vanished from the homepage.

It is called Every Mother's Child and I agree with the poster. We won't be able to end these atrocities, if we do not shed light on them. That is the only way to make it stop.

Here is the link:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/11/10/10410/720

From the diary:
I think of the children in Iraq, some as young as my own. I picture sitting in my living room and hearing a black helicopter hovering over my roof. It's loud, from a speaker I hear what sound like orders being angrily shouted in a language I don't understand. Then I hear the loud crashing of a bomb falling through my ceiling. The last thing I see and hear is my children screaming as acid eats their tender flesh away. This is just a nightmare for me, but for the mothers of Iraq it is a reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
insane_cratic_gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Welcome to DU Dewatson!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dewatson Donating Member (90 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Thanks, glad to be here
would you start a thread for me, I just signed up and it says I don't have enough post to do it myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
insane_cratic_gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. what would that be?
and you really don't need a tremendous amount of posts to start a thread. I would glance around at some topics on the boards and respond to get your count up a little bit. Say about 11ish topics?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dewatson Donating Member (90 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. will do, I can kick stuff and that should help
but would you post the diary in it's own thread.

I like the diary and I wish that people would read and recommend it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
insane_cratic_gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. done
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dewatson Donating Member (90 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Thanks again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
23. Hi Dewatson!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Many threads already on this
Edited on Thu Nov-10-05 01:17 PM by nadinbrzezinski
but will make the point I have been making all over

Be careful with the language and think of this as if you were presenting this to a mythical jury

1.- WP is legal to illuminate targets, for tracer rounds, hand grenades for god sakes and it is NOT considered a WMD, but an incendiary with very limited uses.

2.- It was not used the way it was intended, which moves us into war atrocity \war crime territory

3.- MK 47 are the descendants of NAPALM and those are actually not kosher under the laws of land warfare (we now enter the realm of war crime)

4.- Many will say, (even the Lt Col doing the PR work) but it is allowed for us to use it to obscure troop movement, he is correct, but if that use also leads to the indiscriminate use of this among a civilian population in an Urban area, you enter dangerous territory and we did.

I keep emphasizing this for we have no photos to help us, thanks to our wonderful and so free media that will tell us all that we need to know :sarcasm:



Oh and why should we care (apart of the obvious reasons), well I am a selfish SOB and I want future troops and even our civilians to have some level of protection in future conflict
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
populistdriven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. There is plenty of proof now here is more
Edited on Thu Nov-10-05 01:22 PM by bushmeat
If you watched the weapons shot from helicopters in the video (WATCH THEM) it is pretty clear that these are incindary chemical weapons being shot close to the ground, that they disperse before impact and hit the target quickly, these were not used to illuminate targets.

If you are unsure about the pain experienced by those who died by the WP chemical attacks in Falluja try scraping the head of a (phosphorus-containing) strike-anywhere wooden match under your fingernail and crush it. Try using water to sooth the pain. Now imagine that covering 100,000 fold more surface area of your skin.

No time to read? Then watch these videos:
1) http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article10907.htm
2) http://www.rainews24.rai.it/ran24/inchiesta/body.asp

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/11/9/164137/436

Now is is easy to understand how 100,000 people died in Fallujah. The facts of the matter appear to be that Fallujah was a town of 310,000 people of whom less than an hundred thousand can currently be accounted for. http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article325560.ece http://crookedtimber.org/2005/04/20/lancet-interview/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lancet_survey_of_mortality_before_and_after_the_2003_invasion_of_Iraq


"A Palestinian runs for cover as tanks fire phosphorous
during clashes in Nablus on Sunday, Jan, 9 2000."

http://rawstory.com/news/2005/U.S._Army_publication_confirms_United_States_1109.html

The March edition of Field Artillery magazine, a U.S. Army publication, reveals that the U.S. military did in fact use the incendiary weapon white phosphorous in Fallujah, Iraq, a Daily Kos diarist has found. Here is a link to that publication (pdf) http://sill-www.army.mil/FAMAG/Previous_Editions/05/mar-apr05/PAGE24-30.pdf

"WP proved to be an effective and versatile munition," the article's author wrote. "We used it for screening missions at two breeches and, later in the fight, as a potent psychological weapon against the insurgents in trench lines and spider holes when we could not get effects on them with HE. We fired 'shake and bake' missions at the insurgents, using WP to flush them out and HE to take them out."

A second publication, Infantry Magazine, also alleges that white phosphorous was used near the Iraqi city of Irbil. http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0IAV/is_3_93/ai_n6366546 Newsroom sources tell RAW STORY that the New York Times held a story they were scheduled to run on the weapon's use Thursday.

A terrifying video about the U.S. use of the weapon in Fallujah is available at Information Clearinghouse. http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article10907.htm

ANOTHER VIDEO - http://www.rainews24.rai.it/ran24/inchiesta/body.asp

The U.S. has said any use of the weapon was for "lighting" purposes.

According to the Toxic Disease registry, "White phosphorus is a waxy solid which burns easily and is used in chemical manufacturing and smoke munitions. Exposure to white phosphorus may cause burns and irritation, liver, kidney, heart, lung, or bone damage, and death."

Wikipedia adds, "Detonating a WP shell in a confined area (like firing into a building) will indeed cause an effect comparable to the use of lung agent poison gases for those inside who do not or can not flee, with the additional consequence of setting the room(s) alight. Death will occur from lung edema, phosphoric acid poisoning or the resulting shock, or burns."

Use of white phosphorus is not banned by name in any international treaty. However, the 1980 Convention on Conventional Weapons (Protocol III) prohibits the use of incendiary weapons against civilian populations or in areas that have high civilian populations. The United States is among several nations that are not signatories to the convention.

The PDF of the article is here.
http://sill-www.army.mil/FAMAG/Previous_Editions/05/mar-apr05/PAGE24-30.pdf

DEVELOPING....

Another article:
http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m17639&date=10-nov-2005_03:32_ECT

In other words the claim by the US Government that White Phosphorus was used only for illumination at Fallujah had been pre-emptively debunked by the Army. Indeed, the article goes on to make clear that soldiers would have liked to have saved more WP rounds to use for "lethal missions."

However, as Mark Kraft, an emailer to Eric Alterman's blog, Altercation, points out today, the Field Artillery Magazine article fails to inform its audience that

. . . there is no way you can use white phosphorus like that without forming a deadly chemical cloud that kills everything within a tenth of a mile in all directions from where it hits. Obviously, the effect of such deadly clouds weren't just psychological in nature.

What I saw in Iraq with regards to White Phosphorus
The Liberal US Marine, Daily Kos
http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m17637&date=10-nov-2005_03:17_ECT

November 9, 2005

I was with a Marine Corps unit on the outskirts of An Nasiriyah, Iraq in March 2003. We were set up in the city dump (the nastiest place I have EVER slept at. The flies were horrible), right on the river (I cant remember if it was the Tigiris or the Euphrates). Anyway, the huge fight of the war was An Nasiriyah. The Marine Corps scheme of manuever counted on having An Nasiriyah secured so the remainder of the division could push northward. An Nasiriyah was proving very difficult to secure, so that city became the intregal objective for the Marine Corps.

More below the Jump.

Anyway, I recall vividly a incident that took place at our position. A Marine Artillery battery was within 500 meters of our position and they were providing indirect fire support in support of ground operations occuring in and around An Nasiriyah. I recall them shooting at a target in a tree line, across the river, maybe 700-1000 meters to the east of our position. When the rounds were shot out, they seemed to explode over the target area. A dense white cloud rained down on the tree line and you could see some enemy vehicles attempt to flee the area. I knew from watching similar explosions in training exercises that the cloud raining down on the target area was a white phosphorus round. They shot about 5 of them from my recollection.

I recall thinking, "Man, that is some evil stuff there." Knowing what I know about Willy Pete, it would be a terrible way to die. White Phosphorus is supposed to be used to mark targets for aviation flying high over an objective area. And I know for a fact that no fixed-winged aviation was dropping ordnance in that area, it was too close to friendlies. I know this for a FACT. To see what I saw, not 1000 meters from where I was, in retrospect, is really frightening. I remember feeling like the more of them we killed, the quicker we could go home. And I am positive that is how every servicemember in a combat zone feels.

This is what I saw. No lies, no embellishing, just true facts. We did use Willy Pete on enemies (and due to urban operations, most likely on civilians too).


Weapons of Mass Destruction Employed by US to Imolate Falluja: White Phosphorus is a Chemical Weapon

(GRAPHIC) http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m10211&l=i&size=1&hd=0

March 7, 2005

The use of white phosphorus "violates the Geneva Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare. Incendiary agents such as napalm and phosphorus are not considered to be CW agents since they achieve their effect mainly through thermal energy. http://www.reachingcriticalwill.org/legal/cw/cwindex.html >

However, a report by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry concludes that White Phosphorus achieves its effects mainly through non-thermal energy. It must be concluded that White Phosphorus is considered a CW agent, and would violate the Geneva Protocol since its use causes indiscriminate and extreme injuries especially when deployed in an Urban area such as Falluja, Iraq.

Pictures of the dead of Falluja have been published by reporter Dahr Jamal of the Electronic Iraq project, and several commentators have suggested that their injuries are consistent with the use of White Phosphorus by US forces in Falluja.


http://www.emedicine.com/EMERG/topic918.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_phosphorus_incendiary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. I saw them, and you kow what came to mind? GUERNICA
Edited on Thu Nov-10-05 01:26 PM by nadinbrzezinski
but we have to be damn careful with the language... and be correct on its use

And the fact does not change, WP is NOT a WMD, it is an INCENDIARY... this is a technicality, but it woudl not fly in a jury counselor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. This will fall on deaf ears
People around here don't give a fuck about facts in this case. It's WMD and that's that. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I know I keep repeating it becuase hwo we frame this
is critical
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
populistdriven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. It kills by inhalation, blistering lungs and skin - ITS A CHEMICAL WEAPON
Edited on Thu Nov-10-05 01:30 PM by bushmeat
It leaves clothing mostly intact - sounds like a CHEMICAL AGENT to me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. But it is not, it is NOT classified as such
look by your definition, bullets are a chemical weapon for they require the hammer to strike the cartridge to ignite the charge, that is a chemical reaction.

Be careful Counselor or any person with a little knowledge will tear your argument apart... it is not a chemical weapon and the distinction under the laws of land warfare is put there for a reason, this is NOT mustard Gas or Sarin... if it entered into that classification it would be banned under the Chemical weapons protocol of 1921...

Exactness matters...

And I am not denying an atrocity was committed, it was, but we need to be careful how we frame this with Joe Six Pack and some Joes, even some Jills have served and KNOW how WP is classified. Call it a chemical weapon and they will block the rest of your argument, counselor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RethugAssKicker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. I don't give a shit what its classified as....
When used on people it behaves as a chemical weapon with the means of mass destruction!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
populistdriven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. I have seen it falling in the night sky - don't ask me how or where but
It scared the hell out of me the first time I saw it.

At night it looks like liquid fire with no flame envelope, just falling liquid fire, like pale-white-hot clumps of falling lava.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. no, it is an incindiary
and it is very common. It was used in huge amounts by all sides in WWII and in probably every war since
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. WP has been used in virtually every war since WWII
it is very common. Probably every army in the world has WP in it's arsenal. It is usually used in mortar or artillery shells, or in hand grenades.

it is not a "chemical weapon" in the same sense nerve gas is. It is an incindiary used to burn troops out of fixed positions, like napalm.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
populistdriven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. It has also been used to immolate a City
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC