Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rep Hinchey -- H. Res. to obtain all 2003 SOTU drafts re: "16 words"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 03:33 PM
Original message
Rep Hinchey -- H. Res. to obtain all 2003 SOTU drafts re: "16 words"
For Immediate Release

November 10, 2005

Hinchey Introduces Measure To Obtain All White House Drafts Of
2003 State of the Union Address That Contained False Iraq Uranium Claims


Congressman Says American Public Deserves To Know How Infamous 16 Words About Iraq Seeking Uranium From Africa, Now Proven False, Made It Into Final Draft Of Speech; Measure Would Force Administration To Give Congress All Documents Related To 2003 State of the Union & October 2002 Speech That Didn't Include Such Claims Because CIA Said They Were Unsubstantiated

Washington, D.C. - In an effort to find out how the now infamous 16 words about Iraq seeking uranium from Africa, which turned out to be false, made it into President Bush's 2003 State of the Union address, Congressman Maurice Hinchey (D-NY) today introduced a House resolution that would require the White House to present Congress with all drafts and documents related to the crafting of that speech. Hinchey's measure would also require the White House to deliver to Congress all drafts and related documents surrounding an October 2002 speech that the president made in which he discussed a possible mushroom cloud from an Iraqi nuclear weapon, but did not mention an effort by Iraq to obtain uranium from Africa after the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) said such claims were unproven. Congressman Henry Waxman (D-CA), Ranking Member on the House Committee on Government Reform, and Congressman John Conyers, Jr., Ranking Member on the House Judiciary Committee, are original cosponsors of Hinchey's resolution.

"With the Administration's uranium claims at the heart of the ongoing CIA leak investigation, it's imperative that we find out exactly how a false claim about Iraq seeking uranium from Africa for nuclear weapons made its way into the final version of President Bush's 2003 State of the Union address," Hinchey said. "Of particular interest is how and why the uranium claim made it into the State of the Union Address, when just three months earlier the CIA removed a similar uranium reference because the intelligence supporting such a claim was 'weak.' The Congress and the American people deserve to see every draft, every e-mail, and every memo that details the evolution of both the State of the Union Address and the October 2002 speech that omitted the uranium reference. Since the White House refuses to be up front and honest about how the false uranium claim made it into President Bush's 2003 State of the Union address, it is up to the Congress to take every piece of information that went into the crafting of that speech and put together the puzzle to determine what went wrong."

In his 2003 State of the Union address President Bush said, "The British Government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa." It has been reported that the original draft of the State of the Union address stated that, "we know that has recently sought to buy uranium in Africa," but after the White House consulted with the CIA, the speech was changed to refer to the British view rather than the American view.
In response to the uproar over an op-ed article disputing the uranium claims that was written by Ambassador Joseph Wilson, whose wife, Valerie Wilson, had her identity as an undercover CIA operative revealed to the press by members of the Bush Administration, then-CIA Director George Tenet issued a statement in which he took responsibility for the false uranium claim in the State of the Union address. Tenet did admit that CIA officials who reviewed the draft of the State of the Union Address containing the remarks on the supposed Niger-Iraqi uranium deal “raised several concerns about the fragmentary nature of the intelligence with National Security Council colleagues” and "ome of the language was changed."

On October 7, 2002, prior to the 2003 State of the Union Address, President Bush delivered a speech in which he made reference to Iraq using nuclear weapons and urged action against Iraq, saying that the United States, "cannot wait for the final proof -- the smoking gun -- that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud," a reference to the potential for Iraq to use a nuclear weapon. The president stopped short of saying Iraq had recently sought uranium from Africa for a nuclear weapon. According to the Senate Intelligence report, the uranium references remained in the speech until at least its seventh draft when the National Security Council removed it at the CIA's behest.

"We need to find out why the CIA took out the uranium reference in President Bush's October 2002 speech, but apparently allowed that claim to remain in the State of the Union address just a few months later," Hinchey said. "In January 2003, United Nations weapons inspectors still had not found evidence of an Iraqi nuclear program and there was some talk in Congress about withdrawing the war resolution passed months earlier in order to give inspectors more time. It seems clear to me that the uranium claim was used to cement congressional approval for a war with Iraq by essentially scaring the American people into believing Iraq posed an imminent danger. We need to see all the drafts and documents related to the State of the Union address to get to the bottom of this once and for all."

The Hinchey measure to acquire the documents surrounding the State of the Union address and the October 2002 speech is considered a resolution of inquiry, which is a type of bill that seeks factual information from the executive branch. If the measure is adopted, the White House would have 14 days to present Congress with all of the requested documents.

http://www.house.gov/apps/list/press/ny22_hinchey/morenews/111005soturoi.html



Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dave29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. part of your post is apparantly classified
weird
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Repost -- cause of 'line out' was a misplaced []
For Immediate Release

November 10, 2005

Hinchey Introduces Measure To Obtain All White House Drafts Of
2003 State of the Union Address That Contained
False Iraq Uranium Claims


Congressman Says American Public Deserves To Know How Infamous 16 Words About Iraq Seeking Uranium From Africa, Now Proven False, Made It Into Final Draft Of Speech; Measure Would Force Administration To Give Congress All Documents Related To 2003 State of the Union & October 2002 Speech That Didn't Include Such Claims Because CIA Said They Were Unsubstantiated

Washington, D.C. - In an effort to find out how the now infamous 16 words about Iraq seeking uranium from Africa, which turned out to be false, made it into President Bush's 2003 State of the Union address, Congressman Maurice Hinchey (D-NY) today introduced a House resolution that would require the White House to present Congress with all drafts and documents related to the crafting of that speech. Hinchey's measure would also require the White House to deliver to Congress all drafts and related documents surrounding an October 2002 speech that the president made in which he discussed a possible mushroom cloud from an Iraqi nuclear weapon, but did not mention an effort by Iraq to obtain uranium from Africa after the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) said such claims were unproven. Congressman Henry Waxman (D-CA), Ranking Member on the House Committee on Government Reform, and Congressman John Conyers, Jr., Ranking Member on the House Judiciary Committee, are original cosponsors of Hinchey's resolution.

"With the Administration's uranium claims at the heart of the ongoing CIA leak investigation, it's imperative that we find out exactly how a false claim about Iraq seeking uranium from Africa for nuclear weapons made its way into the final version of President Bush's 2003 State of the Union address," Hinchey said. "Of particular interest is how and why the uranium claim made it into the State of the Union Address, when just three months earlier the CIA removed a similar uranium reference because the intelligence supporting such a claim was 'weak.' The Congress and the American people deserve to see every draft, every e-mail, and every memo that details the evolution of both the State of the Union Address and the October 2002 speech that omitted the uranium reference. Since the White House refuses to be up front and honest about how the false uranium claim made it into President Bush's 2003 State of the Union address, it is up to the Congress to take every piece of information that went into the crafting of that speech and put together the puzzle to determine what went wrong."

In his 2003 State of the Union address President Bush said, "The British Government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa." It has been reported that the original draft of the State of the Union address stated that, "we know that (Hussein) has recently sought to buy uranium in Africa," but after the White House consulted with the CIA, the speech was changed to refer to the British view rather than the American view.

In response to the uproar over an op-ed article disputing the uranium claims that was written by Ambassador Joseph Wilson, whose wife, Valerie Wilson, had her identity as an undercover CIA operative revealed to the press by members of the Bush Administration, then-CIA Director George Tenet issued a statement in which he took responsibility for the false uranium claim in the State of the Union address. Tenet did admit that CIA officials who reviewed the draft of the State of the Union Address containing the remarks on the supposed Niger-Iraqi uranium deal “raised several concerns about the fragmentary nature of the intelligence with (White House) National Security Council colleagues” and "some of the language was changed."

On October 7, 2002, prior to the 2003 State of the Union Address, President Bush delivered a speech in which he made reference to Iraq using nuclear weapons and urged action against Iraq, saying that the United States, "cannot wait for the final proof -- the smoking gun -- that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud," a reference to the potential for Iraq to use a nuclear weapon. The president stopped short of saying Iraq had recently sought uranium from Africa for a nuclear weapon. According to the Senate Intelligence report, the uranium references remained in the speech until at least its seventh draft when the National Security Council removed it at the CIA's behest.

"We need to find out why the CIA took out the uranium reference in President Bush's October 2002 speech, but apparently allowed that claim to remain in the State of the Union address just a few months later," Hinchey said. "In January 2003, United Nations weapons inspectors still had not found evidence of an Iraqi nuclear program and there was some talk in Congress about withdrawing the war resolution passed months earlier in order to give inspectors more time. It seems clear to me that the uranium claim was used to cement congressional approval for a war with Iraq by essentially scaring the American people into believing Iraq posed an imminent danger. We need to see all the drafts and documents related to the State of the Union address to get to the bottom of this once and for all."

The Hinchey measure to acquire the documents surrounding the State of the Union address and the October 2002 speech is considered a resolution of inquiry, which is a type of bill that seeks factual information from the executive branch. If the measure is adopted, the White House would have 14 days to present Congress with all of the requested documents.

http://www.house.gov/apps/list/press/ny22_hinchey/morenews/111005soturoi.html



Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedEarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. That would be interesting to see....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. Original draft of SOTU speech by * before speech writers go to it..
Edited on Thu Nov-10-05 03:50 PM by Javaman
Good evening, my fellow Americans...
Saddam is a really really really bad guy, he has like all kinds of shit going on in that country that I can't even begin to tell you about, but trust me, it's really really really bad. Now I have heard from my advisor's that he has some sort of cake. Yellow I think and it's there. I mean, the yellow cake is there, personally I like chocolate, but if he wants yellow cake, what the hell but you know, I'm not a yellow cake fan myself. What is yellow cake anyway? People tell me it's lemon but I just don't see that. Remember those old vanilla cakes that were yellow inside, they were really awful. That's why I like chocolate. Anyway, that cake has apparently gone bad and we have to go get it. So there you have it, Saddam has stale old yellow cake and we have to bring him a fresh chocolate one. Maybe one with filling. I like filling. Like pudding. Yeah, chocolate pudding.
Once we have the cake on the ground, well, I don't mean actually on the ground but maybe on a nice plate or something, then we can resolve this yellow cake matter once and for all. Okay?
Thank you and have a great night.
Oh and make sure you drink plenty of milk with that cake, otherwise it gets all sticky in your mouth and you have pry it off the roof with your fingers. Well, that's how pickles makes hers anyway.
Well, good night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC