Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Saddam Was a Threat to World Peace

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 02:30 PM
Original message
Saddam Was a Threat to World Peace
There's an easy way to tell believable lies. When you are asked a question you can't answer honestly, simply rewrite it in your mind to a question you can answer and answer that question.

So in a Republican's mind, the question "Was world opinion solidly behind President Bush's contention that Saddam Hussein was on the verge of acquiring nuclear weapons and allied with al Qaeda" gets edited to "Did world opinion consider Saddam Hussein a threat to the stability of the middle east, and a problem to be handled?" (Handled in this context is not just militarily; could also imply sanctions or inspections or other ways of moderating Saddam's goals). The answer to the first question is obviously no. The answer to the second question is obviously yes.

So if you are a Republican looking to defend President Bush, which question would you rather answer?

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Don Claybrook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Speaking of not answering the question put to you...
I heard Karen Hughes on NPR yesterday afternoon. The host, Michelle Norris I think, asked Hughes something alnog the lines of, "why do you believe that a majority of the American people are against this war, why does it poll so low?" Hughes answered by talking about needing to finish the mission, help Iraq up by its bootstraps, etc.

Believe it or not, I don't blame Hughes for her answer. It's in her nature to be a liar, and if I were her, I sure wouldn't want to have to answer that question. No, I blame the utterly useless reporter, who, after her question wasn't answered, went right along to the next question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It isn't that long ago when these lap dogs were attack dogs
(think Clinton era)

Which is why i am convinced todays' pseudo journalism is not caused by mere incompetence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BonjourUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes, and Saddam is now in jail and the world is better.
Have a peaceful sleep everyone, the Middle East is quiet. Thank you Bush :rofl:
Wait a moment… I must glance under my bed, perhaps a bomb could be there :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC