Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wash. Post's Woodward's misleading, disingenuous statements on Plame case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 08:08 AM
Original message
Wash. Post's Woodward's misleading, disingenuous statements on Plame case
http://mediamatters.org/items/200511160013



Wash. Post's Woodward's misleading, disingenuous statements on Plame investigation

Woodward's criticisms of Fitzgerald's "assault on the First Amendment" were primarily in response to the jailing of Miller for contempt of court after she refused to reveal who divulged Plame's identity to her. For example, during a taped interview on the July 13 edition of MSNBC's Scarborough Country, Woodward said: "Judy Miller should not be in jail. I think the judge and the special prosecutor in this alleged CIA leak case made a mistake. It's really vital to have confidential sources. I think Judy Miller is doing the right thing. And I think she should be freed and they should reconsider this."

On the October 17 edition of CNN's Larry King Live, Woodward said of Fitzgerald: "And there's a lot of innocent actions in all of this, but what has happened this prosecutor, I mean, I used to call Mike Isikoff, when he worked at The Washington Post, the junkyard dog. Well, this is a junkyard-dog prosecutor, and he goes everywhere and asks every question and turns over rocks and rocks under rocks and so forth." At no point did Woodward disclose that he, too, was a "rock" he did not want Fitzgerald to turn over.

Woodward also defended syndicated columnist Robert D. Novak, who originally made Plame's identity public in a July 14, 2003, column but has since refused to identify his source. Woodward was quoted in a December 1, 2004, Editor & Publisher article saying that "Bob Novak has taken a stand that is supported by many in the press," adding, "He is protecting his sources. He has done nothing that is illegal or improper."

At no point in making these comments did Woodward note that he had a specific and personal interest in Fitzgerald's inquiry: Even as Fitzgerald was subpoenaing reporters, Woodward knew that his testimony, in which he too would presumably be forced to reveal his sources, would have been significant to the investigation.

On several occasions, Woodward dismissed the controversy as much ado about nothing or opined that he saw no evidence of a crime...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. What a smoke screen. I guess he was hoping Fitzgerald would overlook him.
I like Fitzgerald the more I hear about how the neocon are sooo abused by him. This statement alone by Woodward makes me want to cheer. "Well, this is a junkyard-dog prosecutor, and he goes everywhere and asks every question and turns over rocks and rocks under rocks and so forth." Seems Fitzgerald likes to have all the facts and he doesn't get intimidated by politicians or once respected journalists.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Ya know, he either has a head the size of a medicine ball, or he is stupid
as all get out. Think about it--you want to fly under the radar, you KEEP YOUR HEAD DOWN. He had to have MARCHING ORDERS--go out there, Bob, and put out that fire!!!! Poo-poo this story, make it go away, throw a turd or two in the punch!!!

Someone who knew his real agenda likely got pissed off at all of his "opining" and dropped a dime on the schmuck. Either that, or Fitz got the info in some other fashion, and squeezed Woodward.

I think the more the GOP squeals and hollers, the closer Fitz is getting. This is like Watergate, but worse!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Both.... and more
this man has proven to be an arrogant fool...
and is probably on the reich's payroll.

Woodward may have compromised years
ago as payback for Nixon... I bet Bush et al
have something on him.... or maybe
Woodward is just greedy.

we really need to scrutinize all these crooks and
cronies who obscure and protest too much...

who are they protecting.. and why ????


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stanchetalarooni Donating Member (838 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. This guy works part-time for BushCo.
He sounds more like a defender of BushCo than the First Ammendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Binka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. Part Time? He Is A Full Time WH Sycophant.
Bush is an ASSHOLE and Woodward is carrying his stink for him.

Peyton say "Go Fuck Yourself Bob You Big Fairy!"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. in order for the washington post to have any credibility
they should let woodward go

the media is part of the problem, and part of the reason we are in Iraq today

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. definitely the reason why they were able to install bush
into the WHite House; if the media had told the real truth about bush from day one there is no way he would have been considered a viable candidate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
4. Woodward - The lead character of "All the President's Whores"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
5. So gee Bob, what else have you lied to us about?
Maybe Tenet didn't say it was a 'slam dunk'? Maybe you made that one up too? Especially, since Bush desperately needed someone to get him off the hook that day regarding to the Intel he used to go to war in Iraq.

FU Bob, go stick it where the sun don't shine.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
9. They showed him lying last night when asked if he knew anything
about the plame case. He lied. What the fuck is it with this country? Does the truth have any meaning in America whatsoever?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ochazuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
10. Perhaps he had Judy Miller's disease before Judy did
by which I mean, letting all that wonderful confidential access suck you into the evil world of the people you are supposed to be a check upon as a memeber of the fourth estate.

Looks like Woodward has been outed as a hack. So, the second casualty of Plamegate is another journalist. Looks like we kill all the lawyers SECOND.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loonman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
12. Crumb bum
Who woulda thought Woodward was an opportunistic hack?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC