Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Murtha threatened commandant to obtain Purple Heart for wounded kid

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 01:07 PM
Original message
Murtha threatened commandant to obtain Purple Heart for wounded kid
In a chat, Milbank transcribed Murtha's remarks where he departed from the prepared text:

snip>
There's one other kid lost both of his hands, blinded. I was praising him, saying how proud we were of him and how much we appreciate his service to the country. "Anything I can do for you?"

His mother said, "Get him a Purple Heart."

I said, "What do you mean, get him a Purple Heart?"

He had been wounded in taking care of bomblets -- these bomblets that they drop that they have to dismantle.

< MURTHA >: And he had been wounded and lost both his hands. The kid behind him was killed.

His mother said, because they were friendly bomblets, they wouldn't give him a Purple Heart.

I met with the commandant. I said, "If you don't give him a Purple Heart, I'll give him one of mine." And they gave him a Purple Heart.

http://www.warandpiece.com/blogdirs/003102.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. I am at a loss for words. Dedicated losers get Freedom Medals
and the soldiers get the shaft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. see. Murtha IS evil. That's all the proof you need.
Someone alert the Swiftboaters and tell them that Murtha personally blew up a kid who asked for a purple heart by using a friendly bomblet.

:evilgrin:

Seriously though, you know some swiftfreak is going to come out of the woodwork and accuse Murtha of fragging someone or some equally nasty thing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thanks for posting this, Rose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. I read that article elsewhere on DU and I started crying
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. Good for Murtha!!!
It's not an uncommon story. Wounded soldiers denied Purple Hearts because they were wounded or maimed by "friendly" action.

A soldier I know hit by a HUGE truck in Iraq. He was run over at a check point he was working. He died on the spot, revived by medics. Rushed back to Kuwait, out to Germany and then over to Reed in a matter of hours - the doctors at Reed thought they were carrying in another dead soldier he was mangled so badly. Then he mumbled.

Wounded from head to toe. Both legs mangled, internal injuries throughout, ribs cracked and broken, one arm shattered, the other arm broken. Plates in his head had shifted from the impact of the truck and the landing.

No Purple Heart.

Denied

It was a "friendly" that struck him with the truck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SomewhereOutThere424 Donating Member (497 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. It's amazing they call it friendly fire
I don't think someone "On your side" would be firing at you. Maybe they're really really stupid, but still, I think they waive the right to be "On the side of their forces" when they start killing their own.

Isn't military training enough, these days, to show people accidentally or purposely what to and what not to fire at?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brotherjohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. "I'll give him one of mine" is a threat? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Muscled? Strong armed? Pressured?
But I think "threat" is accurate: If you don't do this, I'll do that :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nordmadr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I'll bet he would give him on of his, and then be very public
about it in an attempt to shame those denying him. Definitely threatening if you are trying to avoid bad press and not look "anti-troop".

Olaf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brotherjohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yes, in that light, I could see it as threatening.
But perfectly justifiable.

I thought the OP was pointing out that some swiftboaters were trying to say Murtha physically "threatened" a superior, rather than just stood up to a superior in defense of a wounded soldier. If they are trying to smear him with this, good luck!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I thought it was admirable, not a smear at all
Sorry for the confusion! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brotherjohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. My bad. I was reading about the "swiftboating" of Murtha earlier...
...and I thought they were now saying he was "insubordinate".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
achtung_circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
11. Army regulation here.
<http://www.americal.org/awards/ph.htm>

There seems to be lattitude in the case of situations not specifically covered. Anyone who would not use this lattitude to OK the award should be declared unfit to command anything but a latrine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Exactly! I absolutley agree. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC