Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why the republicans should (and won't) win in 2006/8

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Hope springs eternal Donating Member (213 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 10:47 AM
Original message
Why the republicans should (and won't) win in 2006/8
You think it's bad now? Just wait. China hates us, Iraq is descending into chaos, Afgansitain is a coup away from square 1, the economy is ready to fall into a cliff.....

I don't want Democrats to fall into a trap. Remember Carter? We lost the WH for 12 years after that fiasco. Rethugs should win in 2006 and 2008. Keep it coming until the disaster hits. Then, clean up the mess.


Sometimes, the best thing for a damaged buidling, is to knock it down and start over.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BobBoudelangFan69 Donating Member (171 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. Get Real. The Voting Machines Are Already Reporting ...
Edited on Fri Nov-25-05 10:54 AM by BobBoudelangFan69
GOP sweep in 2006. 2008 vote talleys report complete GOP 'win' (fix) with no democrats in government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. What exactly about the Carter Administration do you consider a fiasco?
Was it all the scandals??? D'oh no scandals. Was it the huge deficit? D'oh no deficit. Was it all the war and killing? D'oh no war no GIs killed. Oh I know he lusted in his heart... Bingo the sex thingy...... right a real fiasco...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Nice try. Obviously you know JC doesn't need defending, but
I doubt this person is listening. Why waste your energy?

Man, the holiday season seems to bring this on, doesn't it? To all the sane people posting on this board: stop feeding them. It just encourages them to start more threads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hope springs eternal Donating Member (213 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Not what he did, but how he's viewed...
We all know Carter was a good guy, but face it, people disliked him. He had the balls to say to the American people's faces that they were greedy, ignorant and cynical. He was a good president in principal, but if principal was what mattered, would Bush be here today?

No, he would not.


Let the Rethugs win. Then, no amount of ESIS and Diebold can stop people exiling them out of the country...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. You have any quotations or citations for saying
Edited on Fri Nov-25-05 11:17 AM by janeaustin
"He had the balls to say to the American people's faces that they were greedy, ignorant and cynical"?

He didn't say any such thing, and I don't think for a minute he's ever believed any such things.



(Edited for punctuation)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chalky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
4. China HATES us? China OWNS us. If georgie keeps pissing them off
they're gonna call in their marker--and boy, will we be ska-rewed.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
7. And you are sure our country can be salvaged after 4 more years of this?
That's a risk we can't take.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
8. There's some truth to that.
But I think a lot more people see that coming now. In many ways the train wreck has already happen for many Americans. They want change now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
10. Back in the day...
Edited on Fri Nov-25-05 11:27 AM by IMModerate
I had a left wing friend who promoted voting for Nixon. His reasoning was that Nixon's election would bring on the revolution.

Later on, he admitted that it didn't work out as he had envisioned. In fact, it seems as though the Republicans drew strength, became more radical as revenge for Nixon, and the loss in Vietnam.

Don't ignore that the situation is dynamic, and the opposition is always opportunistic. If we can win then we must, and press our advantages as we encounter them. To think we can only win because "they are so bad" diminishes our message. And as others have pointed out, we can't allow needless suffering.

--IMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
11. I wish that strategy worked
I remember liberals recommeding we vote for Reagan as governor of California based on the same logic. We know where that got us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
12. How long do you think they should keep winning for?
Edited on Fri Nov-25-05 12:12 PM by Crunchy Frog
Until this country has been reduced to rubble and brought back to the stone age? What makes you think there will even be anything left to salvage at that point? And what about the rest of the world? Should they have to suffer the effects of our insane rampages, environmental destruction, and general havoc just so we can give the Repukes all the time that they need to hang themselves?

Countries that get knocked down and "started over" rarely make any kind of meaningful recovery, and they often end up under some sort of long term totalitarianism. The mess will be too big to clean up, and it won't affect just the people in this country. That's too high a price just to make some sort of point about Republicans being bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC