Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BRAD BLOG: SoS Spokes Evades Diebold/CA Questions in Live On-Air Interview

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
BradBlog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 09:41 PM
Original message
BRAD BLOG: SoS Spokes Evades Diebold/CA Questions in Live On-Air Interview
Sec. of State Spokesperson Evades Questions in Live On-Air Interview About California/Diebold Situation
Brad Questions McPherson Communications Director on KRXA's Peter B. Collins Show

Just finished a rather remarkable hour on our good friend Peter B. Collin's radio show on KRXA out of Monterey, CA.

Peter was able to bring Nghia Nguyen Demovic, a spokesperson from the CA Sec. of State's office on air the last few minutes of the hour to try and clarify some of the last minute tomfoolery that seems to be going on concerning the impending decision about whether or not to re-certify Diebold Electronic Touch-Screen Voting Machines in the state of California.

As previously reported on BRAD BLOG, the Republican SoS Bruce McPherson -- remarkably, and nearly inexplicably -- seems to be leaning towards doing allowing their faulty machines back into the state as the Help America Vote Act's January 1, 2006 deadline for such acquisitions approaches.

As California goes, so goes the rest of the country!

The evasion of a simple question about a recent public hearing on the matter in Sacramento has to be heard to be believed...

FULL STORY w/ AUDIO CLIP OF INTERVIEW:
http://www.bradblog.com/archives/00002087.htm

---
Brad Friedman
THE BRAD BLOG - The uprising continues...
http://www.BradBlog.com
VELVET REVOLUTION - The revolution has begun...
http://www.VelvetRevolution.us

*** The BRAD SHOW On the Air via RAW RADIO!
*** http://www.BradShow.com
*** Broadcast coast-to-coast and around the globe!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
buddysmellgood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. That is amazing. They are going to jam Diebold down California's throat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PowerToThePeople Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Kick, Come on CA residents, don't let this happen.. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marions ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. kick
:kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. Geez...would these rat bastards take a break already?
:grr: :grr: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BradBlog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 02:28 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. A kick for California...
...Which is busy kicking for the rest of the country! So anybody else who can help kick in for all of this would also be appreciated and probably doing themselves a favor no matter where they live!

Brad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nicknameless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 05:45 AM
Response to Original message
6. Harri Hursti is a "client" of Bev Harris?!!
According to blogger, Doug Eldritch, on BradBlog:

That, again, Bruce (McPherson) has no authority to do.

He either responds in writing to Bev Harris's written questions and the procedural manual already set forth by the state, or this goes to court again, and Harris's client Hursti will have no intentions of going along with the 'sham test' just because someone requested it.

Doug E.


How can a one-person test be valid, in the first place?
And in the second place, it's someone tied to Bev?!
This is a 5-star smell test failure!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nicknameless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 06:18 AM
Response to Original message
7. I keep reading that Diebold's failure rate is 10%, but during the CA tests
in August, their failure rate was MUCH worse. Nearly 20% of the touch-screen machines crashed.

http://www.verifiedvotingfoundation.org/article.php?id=6257

Diebold's Problems Worse Than Reported, Tests Find


System Crashes, Paper Jams Prove Widespread in California Counties
by Ian Hoffman, Daily Review
August 3rd, 2005

Diebold's latest electronic voting machine, desired by dozens of counties nationwide, fared worse in the nation's first mass testing than previously disclosed, with almost 20 percent of the touch-screen machines crashing.

<snip>

Software problems occurred in those earlier tests, but state voting-systems analysts were more focused in the mock election on paper jams. Yet when Diebold representatives trucked in 96 new TSx machines and local elections officials voted on them July 20 in a San Joaquin County warehouse, nearly twice as many machines froze or crashed as had paper jams.

<snip>

On the strength of paper jams alone, two-dozen critics of electronic voting rallied in front of the Alameda County administrative offices Tuesday and demanded that county supervisors withdraw from negotiations to buy the machines. Homemade signs accused the McKinney, Texas-based maker of voting machines, of "stealing" elections and called on Alameda County to "dump Diebold."

<snip>

Nineteen machines had 21 screen freezes or system crashes, producing a blue screen and messages about an "illegal operation" or a "fatal exception error." A Diebold technician had to restart the machine for voting to resume. Ten machines had a total of 11 printer jams. Almost one-third of all machines in the mock election had a problem.



(More at link)

We're supposed to believe that these machines are now functioning properly? ... Obviously, the only reason to certify them is for the purpose of election fraud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. an evening kick. . . . . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 06:19 AM
Response to Original message
8. it's exhausting
maintaining constant pressure is supposed to help STOP the bleeding
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I know how you feel, but we simply cannot let it be exhausting.
We must find ways to individually renew ourselves--rest, take a break, let others do it for a while--and keep restoring our collective energy.

There is nothing more important than transparent elections. Without them, our country cannot correct its wrong course. Without them, we do not have a democracy.

Our corporate rulers have struck at the heart of our democracy, and have stripped us of our most fundamental right: our right to vote. They have done that for a reason--because our vote is potentially very powerful. Theoretically, we have the right, as a sovereign people, to dismantle these corporations--to pull their corporate charters and seize their assets--and, at the least, to regulate and tax them, and prosecute their crimes, here and abroad. And American votes are particularly potent, because U.S.-based global corporate predators are the ones doing the most damage to other people and to our planetary environment. They could not permit us honest votes any more--because we might just join the rest of the world in seeking justice and peace. (It's happening, you know, ELSEWHERE. The U.S. is the most backward of nations now.)

We, of course, don't just have the problem of restoring our right to vote--of seizing it back from private corporations--we have the problem of our filthy campaign contribution system, our war profiteering corporate news monopolies, and the ever-increasing squeeze on the poor and middle class, which limits citizen action.

But we can do nothing about any of our critical problems and wrong directions without an honest vote count. It is fundamental. And we cannot let ourselves get tired of seeking it, no matter how hard it is.

How tired did Nelson Mandela get, during 30 years of imprisonment? How tired did our black citizens get, during hundreds of years of slavery, prejudice, segregation and second class citizenship?

Of course they're making it hard, because it is SO IMPORTANT to them that we NOT BE PERMITTED free and fair elections.

Keep that in mind. How hard it is a MEASURE of its importance to the fascists who have seized control of our government.

---------------------------

It is a NO-BRAINER that Diebold should be driven out of the election business--and ES&S and Sequoia also. Elections shouldn't BE a private business! The Diebold election theft machines in question, in California right now, are the WORST of the lot--the most hackable, the most unaccountable. We shouldn't even have to have this fight. This is CALIFORNIA! This is AMERICA!

But we DO have this fight. Here we are. And, one step at time--with citizen renewing citizen, in an ever growing movement--we will throw off Diebold's touchscreens, and, after that, all of the election systems by which private corporations can fiddle our vote counts.

Word is getting out. The climate around this issue is changing dramatically for the better. Soon it will become obvious to everyone that these electronic voting systems are intolerable. Then, we, the people--not one hero, not one activist or group, but all of us, collectively--will make it impossible for our rulers and their lapdog press to ignore this "no brainer" any longer, and to foist fraudulent votes upon us.

Then we activists--after acting to insure that election system reform is adequate and there are no more tricks--can maybe move on to the campaign contribution system.

DO realize, re: the California situation, that THIS IS WHY former Dem Sec of State Kevin Shelley was gotten rid of, and Schwarzenegger's appointee, Bruce McPherson, was installed. Shelley had sued Diebold and decertified these very machines (and had demanded Diebold's source code!) We would not have this problem if Shelley were Sec of State. McPherson is a Diebold shill. He was installed IN ORDER TO CHANGE Shelley's policy of high skepticism and vigilance over our right to vote, ESPECIALLY with regard to Diebold.

And one of the things we must be aware of is WHO got rid of Shelley. It wasn't just the SF Chronicle and the other corporate news monopolies. It was collusive Democrats in the legislature--the new Dem leadership--who strongarmed Dem members NOT to support Shelley. So either they are already bought and paid for, or they are afraid--possibly of people like Connie McCormack, head of L.A. elections, and another Diebold shill (and a Democrat, so-called), who led the campaign against Shelley, or they are afraid of the kind of "black op" smear campaign that was pulled on Shelley, by whoever did the smear part (I'm not sure--I suspect the Bush Cartel).

If it was fear (and I suspect that it was), then we have to make it safe for Dems to support transparent elections, by their doing it en masse, and by rousing the public to support them for it. I think CEPN and others are doing a great job in that respect, getting hundreds of public commenters to Sacto for the hearings, and sending out alerts for letters and calls. It's working. It's putting great pressure on McPherson, and it's getting noticed. Debra Bowen (state senator) showed up at the recent hearing (she's apparently running for Sec of State in the next election). That's very unusual.

Ohio vs. California: Touchscreens were the difference

There was a huge difference between what happened in the Ohio initiative election, recently, and what happened in California, with Schwarzenegger's initiatives, and the difference was Diebold touchscreens! In Ohio, they had four election reform initiatives on the ballot--which got Diebolded. The reforms were winning 60/40 in pre-elections polls, then got flipped over to a 60/40 LOSS by the machines on election day. A blatant and outrageous flip. In California, however, WITHOUT TOUCHSCREENS, we were able to defeat Schwarzenegger's initiatives to punish the unions, pass his own budget and redistrict the state to favor Republicans.

Their ability to flip our elections is greatly enhanced by Diebold and other touchscreens. Without the touchscreens, we can overcome whatever fiddle they're doing, and win, by our sheer numbers. (A lot of people don't realize that MOST Americans are actually quite progressive in their views--it's true!)

We should use this contrast to educate the Dem leaders. In fact, I'm going to write to them about it today, because I just thought of it. What a contrast! And touchscreens ARE the difference!

See Bob Koehler's recent column on the Ohio initiatives:
http://www.tmsfeatures.com/tmsfeatures/subcategory.jsp?custid=67&catid=1824
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. (I wish I could nominate this post). . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Al-CIAda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
12. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donkeyotay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
13. We had Katherine Harris, Florida, 2000 and Ken Blackwell, Ohio, 2004
and we will have Republican SoS Bruce McPherson, California, 2008, along with some plausible story about how America just hasn't had enough Republican Corruption. More! More!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC