Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DLC Think Tank - Progressive Policy Institute (PPI)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-05 01:23 PM
Original message
DLC Think Tank - Progressive Policy Institute (PPI)
Edited on Sat Dec-10-05 01:24 PM by cyberpj
Is this the corporate DLC's way to address "progressive" issues (since the establishment of PDA?) I'm not seeing much in the way of meat on the bones here:

http://www.ppionline.org/ppi_ci.cfm?knlgAreaID=87&subsecID=205&contentID=1252

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-05 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. THIS guy's an interesting addition to a Dem think tank:
PPI | Bio | September 22, 2004
Marshall Wittmann
Senior Fellow

Marshall Wittmann is a senior fellow at the Progressive Policy Institute. Previously, he was Director of Communications for Senator John McCain (R-AZ). Mr. Wittmann has served in various positions with the Hudson Institute, Heritage Foundation, Christian Coalition, and in the administration of President George H. W. Bush.

Wittman explains his political journey in the October, 2004 issue of Blueprint magazine.








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-05 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. so it appears they are adopting the GOP way of labeling things opposite:
"no child left behind" "Patriot Act" for the GOP and Progressive Policy Institute for the DLC and Mr. Wittmann.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-05 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. need any more proof that the DLC is a BushCo front? . . .
a Republican agenda dressed in Democratic clothes . . .

if the DLC actually represented Democratic values and interests, they'd be leading the fight against e-voting . . . ("Elections" is not even on their list of issues) . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-05 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. No election reform as an issue is unforgivable. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-05 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. Just check out the PPI's founder Will Marshall and PNAC connections.
Edited on Sat Dec-10-05 02:32 PM by Carolab
It's all you need to know. This former journalist from Richmond, VA is a neocon in disguise. I advise reading this entire article for valuable background.

http://www.worldpress.org/Americas/2030.cfm

Liberal Hawks Ally With Project for the New American Century

Neocons and Liberals Together, Again
Tom Barry
International Relations Center
February 16, 2005

The neoconservative Project for the New American Century (P.N.A.C.) has signaled its intention to continue shaping the government’s national security strategy with a new public letter stating that the “U.S. military is too small for the responsibilities we are asking it to assume.” Rather than reining in the imperial scope of United States national security strategy as set forth by the first Bush administration, P.N.A.C. and the letter’s signatories call for increasing the size of America’s global fighting machine.

The Jan. 28 P.N.A.C. letter advocates that House and Senate leaders take the necessary steps “to increase substantially the size of the active duty Army and Marine Corps.”

Joining the neocons in the letter to congressional leaders were a group of prominent liberals — giving some credence to P.N.A.C.’s claim that the “call to act” to increase the total number of United States ground forces counts on bipartisan support.

After an initial spate of public pronouncements after Sept. 11 and during the onset of the Iraq occupation, the Project for the New American Century is again positioning itself as the policy institute that will set the second Bush administration’s security agenda. Although P.N.A.C.’s 1997 statement of principles included only prominent right-wing figures — many of whom later joined the first Bush administration — the neocon policy institute has repeatedly reached out to liberals to give its public letters to the Congress and the president the gloss of bipartisanship.

Its new call for congressional leaders to increase overall United States troop levels includes endorsement of key liberal analysts. Among the signatories are the leading foreign policy analysts at the Brookings Institution and the Progressive Policy Institute (P.P.I.), which are closely associated with the Democratic Party. The endorsees of the letter are largely neoconservatives who are principals in such neocon-led institutes as P.N.A.C., American Enterprise Institute (A.E.I.), Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, and the Center for Security Policy. However, this call for a larger expeditionary force was also signed by prominent liberal hawks, including Michael O’Hanlon, Ivo Daalder, James Steinberg, and Will Marshall — all of whom have signed previous P.N.A.C. letters and policy statements.

(snip)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-05 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Wow. I'm just amazed they put this PPI info right up there on the DLC site
Edited on Sat Dec-10-05 03:24 PM by cyberpj
http://www.dlc.org/index.cfm

It's a line/tab - right next to the link/tab for the DLC.

I didn't realize they were so PROUD of their hawk/PNAC leanings.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 04:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC