Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Say What? Letter from my repug rep

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
JuneInJax Donating Member (83 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 11:53 PM
Original message
Say What? Letter from my repug rep
OK, today I wrote to my representative and senators saying *'s using the NSA for domestic surveillance without a court order bothers me, and I asked them to support an investigation of the practice. I said that if it's found to be illegal (I couched for legal reasons), that * should be brought up for impeachment. I did not use the word terrorism, or Iraq, or troops. Yet I got this response back from the GOP representative for my district. It's obviously a form letter, but couldn't they at least use a form that mentioned my original issue?? I think I'd rather have gotten a "thanks for writing, we'll look into your issue" bit of fluff than this.
Moni

----- Original Message -----

Dear Friend:



Thank you for contacting me to express your opinions regarding George Bush's Presidency. I appreciate your taking the time to share your thoughts on this matter.



The matter of the impeachment of a president or any other officer should never be taken lightly or casually. The Constitution of the United States sets forth the general principles which control the procedural aspects of impeachment. As you may be aware, the House of Representatives was delegated the power to impeach an official, while the United States Senate was designated as the only body with the power to try an article of impeachment. Both the Senate and the House have designed procedures to implement these general principles in dealing with a wide range of impeachment issues.



The focus of the impeachment inquiry is to determine whether the person involved has engaged in treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors. If the House Committee on the Judiciary determines that grounds for impeachment exist, a resolution impeaching the individual in question and setting forth specific allegations of misconduct will be reported to the full House. As you may be aware, only three Presidents faced impeachment proceedings since the ratification of our Constitution; however, only two were actually impeached by the House of Representatives.



In 1867, President Andrew Johnson was impeached by the House on the ground that he had violated the "Tenure of Office" Act ; however, he was acquitted by the Senate. Over one hundred years later, Congress moved to impeach President Richard Nixon, a move forestalled only by the resignation of the President on August 9, 1974. Three articles of impeachment were approved by the House Judiciary Committee, charging obstruction of the investigation of the "Watergate" burglary inquiry, misuse of law enforcement and intelligence agencies for political purposes, and refusal to comply with the Judiciary Committee's subpoenas.



Finally, in 1998, P resident Clinton was impeached by the House, but acquitted by vote of the Senate. The House approved two articles of impeachment against the President that charged the President with committing perjury in testifying before the grand jury and charged the President with obstruction of justice relating both to the civil lawsuit and to the grand jury proceedings. Two additional articles of impeachment had been approved by the House Judiciary Committee but were rejected by the full House. The Senate trial resulted in acquittal on both articles.



While I certainly understand and support your right to disagree with the actions of your government, Article II, Section 2, Clause 1 of the Constitution states that the ". President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States.." When I took office, I took an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States . President Bush exercised his authority as president to use troops abroad to protect national interests abroad.



War is never a first option, and it was not the case in Iraq . Only after years of failed efforts on behalf of the international community did the United States take action in Iraq . Although the original reasons for going to war never materialized, a heinous and dangerous dictator was brought to justice and a people who strive for freedom are now in the midst of forming an historic government founded in democracy and freedom for all people. Time will judge the true impact of the sacrifices that we have made and I believe that in the end, our efforts today will bring peace and stability to this region.



While we may disagree on the Bush Presidency, I believe that President Bush correctly exercised his authority as Commander-in-Chief and upheld his Constitutional responsibility to protect the interests of America . As I stated earlier, the use of the constitutional tool of impeachment should never be exercised lightly or for political reasons. As long as I am a Member of the United States House of Representatives, I will faithfully execute my constitutional responsibilities and only use tools such as the impeachment power when warranted - not because of political gain or motivation.



Any implication that we are currently overcommitted abroad and therefore are unable to handle emergencies domestically is also erroneous. Our national security posture is structured to support multiple overseas contingencies or homeland security emergencies at one time. As of mid September, over 50,000 service personnel were on the ground or aboard ships supporting Hurricane Katrina relief efforts. Of this amount, over 35,000 are from the state National Guard units, and more troops are available if needed.



Our military forces can support our current international contingencies and domestic security responsibilities. I support the men and women of our armed forces for neutralizing the threats posed to us. These brave men and women, home and abroad, have left their families to protect our country so their fellow Americans will be safer here at home.



While we may not agree on every issue, I am sure we can find common ground and continue to protect the freedom and democracy of all Americans worldwide. I truly appreciate your taking the time to contact me. Please feel free to contact me if I can be of any further assistance on this matter or other issues facing Congress.





Sincerely,




ANDER CRENSHAW
Member of Congress
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
laheina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. Looks like a catch-all
that has the added bonus of boring/confusing the reader to death. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. Let's see if other reps are using the same letter
in response to any letter that mentions the word "Impeachment". Or at least the same language and phrases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guruoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I've seen parts of this same text used ...
in letters from other representatives.

This part sounds pretty much verbatim like something I read
over a year ago in a letter posted on the 'net:

While I certainly understand and support your right to disagree with the actions of your government, Article II, Section 2, Clause 1 of the Constitution states that the ". President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States.." When I took office, I took an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States . President Bush exercised his authority as president to use troops abroad to protect national interests abroad.



War is never a first option, and it was not the case in Iraq . Only after years of failed efforts on behalf of the international community did the United States take action in Iraq . Although the original reasons for going to war never materialized, a heinous and dangerous dictator was brought to justice and a people who strive for freedom are now in the midst of forming an historic government founded in democracy and freedom for all people. Time will judge the true impact of the sacrifices that we have made and I believe that in the end, our efforts today will bring peace and stability to this region.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1monster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. At least Crenshaw is a hair better than Tillie Fowler. More than that I
can't say. The rep for this district just south of you is John Mica. 'nuff said? sigh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
4. How about another letter to your rep that says "HEY! I didn't ask you for
lecture on the history of impeachments.

"How about responding to the points I raised, OK?"

And maybe send that one until you get a real answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC