Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If a corporation has only one customer (the federal government), then why

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
begin_within Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 04:56 PM
Original message
If a corporation has only one customer (the federal government), then why
isn't that corporation simply part of the government, rather than a private corporation?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RagingInMiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. There is no oversight
There is no obligation to provide public records. They don't have to answer to "the people", which lately is just a myth anyway.

And if they were part of the government, they probably wouldn't qualify for all that corporate welfare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solo_in_MD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Contracting out is not inherently bad
It depends what gets sent out...

Commercially available goods and services should be bought and not done in house unless it makes economic sense. Contracting out decision authority on the other hand is a bad thing (and against the law). It is the out contracting that supports UARCs and other ways to bring in academics and other outsiders into Government procurements.

Gore was not the only guy trying to tame the bureaucracy, it started before he was VP and is still on going. The result is a dramatic downsizing in the DoD and elsewhere within the Federal Gov. Not downplaying his role, he was a strong support of greater efficiency, but he was no more the primary source for it than he was the inventor of the internet. Oddly enough, one of biggest supporters these days for some of the things Gore was pushing is Rummie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Because the Government was too inefficient to do it themselves.
They let contractors fight over it and award to the lowest and/or most suitable vendor.

This was a big part of Al Gore's re-inventing Government plan...to get rid of the $60 hammer syndrome.

Too bad Cheney took his place and gave all the work to Halliburton subsidiaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Only in politics can you get away with saying ...

"I can not make this entity more efficient. So I am going to just hire someone else to do all the work instead. Sure, it means additional overhead. But they are more competent than I am, so ultimately the stockholders save."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicaholic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. Then they would have to give 9 year old Indonesian kids fed health insur..
on top of that the corporations wouldn't be able to donate to all of the PACs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. I. Love. That. Poster.
:loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
begin_within Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Thanks - please distribute widely
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC