Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Question: Re Limbaugh's Medical Records

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 01:27 PM
Original message
Question: Re Limbaugh's Medical Records
Limbaugh claims that his medical records should be kept sealed. That any release of his "private medical" information is against the law.

Wait a minute. After the Patriot Act was enacted, doctors were required to have everyone sign a form regarding medical records.

Am i wrong or does the passage of the Patriot Act give permission for authorities to examin these records precisely for the reasons they want to?

Is Limberger getting slammed by the VERY legislation he endorsed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sweet irony if it's true. :)
The harder he tries to hide the records, the more we know he has something to hide, eh?

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cannikin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. I work for a health insurance company...
It is my understanding that the privacy law (HIPAA) states that if the information is needed for ANY sort of criminal investigation, whether the records are for the victim or the accused, they can be released and it is NOT a violation....Now if they release them to the public in anyway..thats a different story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Probable cause was made based on the maid and his admission.
Disclosures to law enforcement officials

The Privacy Rule includes a standard for disclosures to law enforcement officials. The standard permits the following types of disclosures:



Pursuant to a legal process or otherwise required by law, including disclosures of certain types of wounds, and disclosures in response to court orders, subpoenas, and administrative requests. Administrative requests must be specific and limited, relevant to a legitimate ongoing investigation, and must demonstrate that de-identified information (that is, information without individual identifiers) cannot be used.

Limited information disclosures for the location of a fugitive, suspect, material witness or missing person.

Information about an individual who is or is believed to be a victim of crime if the individual agrees to the disclosure or, under specific rules, if the individual is unable to agree or object.

Information about decedents.

Information about crime on the premises of the covered entity if there is a good faith belief that the disclosed PHI is evidence of a crime.

Limited disclosure in emergencies in order to alert law enforcement about the commission of a crime.

This is what I posted in LBN regarding that issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. As usual the media fails to follow thru
Has anyone heard the media provided an expert explaining how this law would/could be used against Limbaugh OR that it is not applicable to this case?

I wonder why they haven't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. nope.
just Rush's views :eyes:

aaaawwwwww poor poor 'victum'

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. That is my understanding also...
They are not being released to the public. They are being released to law enforcement for a criminal investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. which PigBoy is trying to now block
he shouldn't have blown Asskkrack afterall i guess :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonAndSun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. Roy Black must know all this about the Patriot Act and the privacy
notice about medical records. I think that deep down he knows Rush is going to get indicted and maybe convicted, he is just along for the ride for the publicity and money. It doesn't mean he won't try to the best of his ability to get pigboy off, he is a lawyer and that is what they do, even for the worst slimeballs. But he will get a lot of mileage out of his representing Jeff Christy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. Someone needs to tell the Pigboy
Welcome to the Brave New World.

Hey Limbaugh buy a clue. You supported the mutants who run this misadministration. You don't live in a democracy, not since the coup in 2000. Now you want to complain about your right to privacy? What privacy, does anyone in the US have the right to privacy anymore? Not after Bu$hCo enacted the Patriot Act. All I can say is it couldn't happen to a more deserving smuck.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cannikin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Hmm...lets see...what would the appropriate 'conservative' reply be;
If you arent guilty then you've got nothing to worry about, Rush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Bingo!!!!
I can just imagine what PigBoy would be saying if the shoe were on a liberal foot......I think you said it for him..

BTW,welcome to DU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. good one
That is definitely a favorite of the Reich Wing / no privacy types.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beanball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. Mr.Limbaugh and his dittoheads(empty headed zombies)
check out the enemy over at LuciAn.com, the dittoheads are up in arms,they are blaming Clinton its his fault.That gang of racist smucks at LuciAn.com are really funny,their hate is so sick it makes you want to barf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. They're saying it's Clinton's fault Rush took oxy?
Those morans. Everyone knows it was Clinton's penis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Aren't they the same folks
that demanded Clinton release his medical records?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Yeah, I remember. But did Clinton release his medical records?
I forgot. This is a different set circumstances completely is it not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Of course not.
Edited on Mon Dec-22-03 08:49 PM by DoYouEverWonder
They were never the subject (his medical records) of a criminal investigation. It was just folks like Limpballs who was accusing him of everything under the sun, who were screaming and yelling for him to release them. However, he did have to provide his DNA for testing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PsN2Wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
18. Hey Matcom

Sorry about some of my snide remarks the other day on another subject. We probably agree on much more than we disagree.
Now you check my post on Rush and say something nice about me, OK?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rustydog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
19. There are provisions in HIPPA privacy act for
Law enforcement to be able to subpoena documents. They don't just walk into offices and take the documents, there is a legal process they go through.
A person refusing to divulge medical information via HIPPA does not apply when Police are investigating illegal activity and medical records are part of the investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
20. This is a felony investigation...
I find it difficult to believe that Limbaugh's med records would remain sealed.

In the short run, and this is the real question...if these were legitamate Rx's, why did he have to get his housekeeper to get thousands of pills with cigar boxes of cash?

No MD in the country would prescribe some 2000 pills, the DEA would lock him up instantaneously. Let's not forget, these ore not your usual 30-50 counts bottles of pills; these are thousands, in plastic bags yet!

No way for the slug to get out of this one, I don't care what his medical records say. He purchased Schedule II, III, and IV drugs illegally.

Perp walk when he gets back to FL, if he ever goes back there.

:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC