Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Woman Butted By Ram Awarded $1.3 Million

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 07:53 AM
Original message
Woman Butted By Ram Awarded $1.3 Million
<snip>

A WOMAN injured when she was butted in the bottom by a 70kg ram has been awarded almost $1.3 million in compensation.

Ivene Denise Bryan was going into her office at the Arid Zone Research Institute in Alice Springs in June 1994 when the ram attacked.

The ram tossed Mrs Bryan 2.5m and she landed face-down. The ram then stood over her for 30 minutes while she called for help.

The ram had escaped from an adjoining fenced area managed by the Northern Territory Parks and Wildlife Commission, which had hired Ms Bryan to feed animals at the institute.

In the Northern Territory Supreme Court today, Ms Bryan was awarded $1,278,000 in compensation.

http://www.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,11868579%255E421,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's just stupid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Misunderestimator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Not sure if it's so stupid without having been on the jury...
"Justice Sally Thomas said the commission had failed in its duty of care, saying Ms Bryan suffered substantial and debilitating injuries to her lower back, groin and legs."

If the injuries are debilitating and she is unable to work, then I don't think the settlement is at all unreasonable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Oh, sure, they hide that paragraph under the HUGE ASS ad
Didn't even see it. Well, all right, if she was injured and can't work, then that is an issue to be compensated for.

Wish the article said more. But yeah, since she was there to work, then I guess the employer should be held repsonsibile, even though it is a wild animal and no one actually has any control over them.

I'd just hate to see it get into a pattern of being able to sue someone (like the government) for the actions of wild animals (say, at a national park).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC