Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

List some things George Lucas did *right* in the prequels (SPOILERS)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
DerekG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 10:53 PM
Original message
List some things George Lucas did *right* in the prequels (SPOILERS)
Edited on Tue May-24-05 10:54 PM by DerekG
Alas, it would be a stretch to deem the prequel films successes (I and II, anyway). And yet, I'd hardly call them abject failures, either. Despite the CGI overload and stolid performances, the films offered much in the way of subtext, and some of these revelations enriches the Star Wars mythos. Here, IMHO, are three things Lucas did right:

1. The rise of Palpatine--Admit it, the circumstances surrounding the Emperor's ascension were far more interesting than anything most of us imagined. He convinced the Trade Federation to conduct an invasion, only to betray them, with the aim of sending these dim corporatists into the arms of his Sith apprentice, who--proclaiming himself an idealistic secessionist--led them into a war that was a waste for all but one. In this respect, Lucas wasn't looking to Flash Gordon for inspiration, he was looking to ancient and modern history. And it worked.

2. Qui-Gon Jinn and the Jedi Knights--Far from being the romantics we imagined, the Jedi were, in reality, hopelessly dogmatic and detached from humanity. In short, they had it coming. In contrast is Qui-Gon Jinn, the maverick who turned his back on the Council in order to devote his life to "the Living Force." With Anakin as the trigger, and Luke as "the new hope," Jinn's dream would be realized. Thus, the Return of the Jedi is not a restoration, but a fresh start.

3. The Death Star--Using the Death Star in two out of the three classic films was rather lazy, but fitting it into II and III suggests how integral the weapon was in Palpatine's plan for galactic domination. Its destruction (in both cases) packs a more powerful punch now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. I agree for the most part.
I don't know if the Jedi deserved to be wiped out but they certainly were very arrogant. Having them in control would always be preferable to having a Sith Lord Emporer I would think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC