Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kirstie Alley's weight loss program: Why J. Craig and NOT Scientology?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Atlas Mugged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 07:32 AM
Original message
Kirstie Alley's weight loss program: Why J. Craig and NOT Scientology?
Has this been addressed before? Wouldn't the CoS have more to gain over Alley's loss than Jenny Craig? People would be quitting gyms and diets in droves if all they had to do was join the CoS and shed pounds the easy way - which would more than likely be starvation due to the high overhead of joining.

But, seriously, since Alley claims that Scientology got her off cocaine and other substances, as well as many other soft "miracles", wouldn't weight control be a major marketing angle for them? Unless, they're full of shit to begin with, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. Scientology wouldn't pay her?
Good question, though.

I think it was the weight thing plus the career move/money for Kirstie.

Surely her "church" wouldn't want her to miss out on something beneficial for her career!

Maybe we should ask Tom Cruise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KitchenWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. Unless, they're full of shit to begin with
Bingo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. You raise a very interesting question.
Edited on Sun Jun-12-05 07:36 AM by mcscajun
And you're last sentence is probably the answer.

Now that's my smart-assed comment.

Seriously, though, Somebody in the press could raise this with Tom Cruise next time he's being weird and mouthing off about Scientology. It would be fascinating to watch his mouth move, much like a fish gasping for air.

OTOH, the money she's making from doing the ads probably does, at least in part, flow back into Scientology's coffers, so there's that to consider.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Actually, someone should ask Mr. Cruise,
next time he says there's no science behind psychiatry and advocates that psychiatry be outlawed:

"That's an interesting point, Mr. Cruise. Could you explain to me the 'science' behind Scientology? Also, while we're on the topic of science, could you provide me with clinical studies supporting Scientology as a means of alleviating and curing mental illness?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Nooooooo....That's the question he wants. The first one, anyway.
That's the Scientologist's stock-in-trade.

It's the Second question I'm not sure of...they probably have 'clinical studies' bought and paid for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Yeah, but I want to hear him say it.
I want to hear him explain the science.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. I can't believe I'm about to defend Scientology but
I read an article a while back claiming that it gives its followers self confidence so people like her and John Travolta at their heaviest points could still pursue careers and be happy with their bodies.

Of course that doesn't explain why any Scientologist would ever go on a diet unless of course the only part of you they care about lightening is your wallet so they wouldn't want to alienate followers by pushing them into a diet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Self-confidence is not necessarily a good thing.
Look what it did for *. Self-doubt is healthy, to a certain extent.

While I'm certain that Scientology has been beneficial to a few, I'm not sure that any other hobby couldn't have been just as efficacious. Scientology is bunk, but as a philosophy it seems rather harmless. It's the Church itself that I see as responsible for all the misery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
6. She is filled with millions of thetans
or pizzas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Please, let's not take this off in a fat-bashing direction.
tyvm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr.Green93 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
11. and NOT Scientology?
Maybe because she is nearly broke and Scientology is pay to play?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrior1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. So what is Sciencetology?
Just another cult for weak minded people with a lot of loose cash laying about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr.Green93 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. It is best
not to talk about them. They have a lot of power and a long reach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kikiek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. That is exactly why you talk about them just like this administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kikiek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. I think they have a lot in common with the neo cons. I wrote a paper
Edited on Sun Jun-12-05 09:19 AM by kikiek
in college about how they not only have survived this long as a cult, but thrived. Pretty amazing when you look at how long L Ron Hubbard has been dead. They basically reel em in and keep them in through blackmail and threats. The celebrities are used to entice people in and make Scientology appear respectable. They are into public schools and just about everything you can imagine through "foundations" they fund. They have been waging a war on psychiatry for years. Whenever I read a story about how some antidepressant pill caused something I wonder the real source. (They have people in every faucet of society working for them just like the Christian Right.) The average people owes so much money trying to become "clear" that they end up working just to pay their debt. There have been many documentated cases of deaths and harassments. LA Times wrote a very interesting piece on it I think in the 80's. Also a book was written I think it was called A Piece of Blue Sky. Kind of a dry book though. Very interesting stuff, but very chilling too. I think the Right Wing think tanks, Neo Cons, and Christian Right took a few pages from the operations book of the Scientologists. Interesting link comparing them to 1984 http://www.xenu.net/archive/1984/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr.Green93 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Thanks for the link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atlas Mugged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. But she's a STAR
I would think her celebrity is worth more to them than her annual dues.

Quite frankly, I don't think somebody in the PR department of Clamsville was smart to miss a good opportunity. They could've created a whole new line of products, just as useless as the others glutting the weight loss industry, and slapped her smiling face on them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hyphenate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
14. Because she's getting paid
to endorse Jenny Craig. I doubt if Scientology would pay her to lose weight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC