Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What Woodstock '09 lineup could partly make up for '99 ? My catchphrase would be: "Nothing Nu"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Bombtrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 05:31 PM
Original message
What Woodstock '09 lineup could partly make up for '99 ? My catchphrase would be: "Nothing Nu"
Edited on Sun Feb-11-07 05:32 PM by Bombtrack
And no, no Woodstock 2009 has NOT been announced but it's always a possibility. Here'd be a sweet, well rounded lineup. Not all of them are my favorite bands (most are though) but I try to include respectable acts that would be enjoyed by respecable people.

AC/DC
The Arctic Monkeys
Audioslave
Bad Brains
Better than Ezra
The Black Keys
Black Sabbath
Cheap Trick
David Bowie
Deep Purple
Dinosaur Jr
The Donnas
Edgar Winter
The Flaming Lips
Foo Fighters
Guided By Voices
James Taylor
Jimmy Eat World
Joan Jett & the Blackhearts
John Fogerty
The Living End
The Mighty Mighty Bosstones
Neil Young
Nine Inch Nails
The Offspring
Public Enemy
The Pixies
Queens of the Stone Age
Radiohead
The Raconteurs
R.E.M.
Rob Zombie
The Smashing Pumpkins
Social Distortion
Steve Miller
Tom Petty And The Heartbreakers
TV on the Radio
Weezer
Wolfmother

---

Of those the most reaching notions would probably be Neil Young and Radiohead. I can just see them as being the most super aprehensive about taking the risk of being associated with a franchise that has diminished in quality each time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bombtrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. There's a conspiracy to make me feel sad
nonresponsive bastards
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. The first, I thought, was a one and only event... it made history...
As such, the popularity must be reproduced for ideal financial gain, hence subsequent "events" to make concertgoers believe they are in something special too...

"The Simpsons" had a lampoon of Lollapalooza that says the point eloquently... :D

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bombtrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Homerpalooza might be my favorite Simpsons episode. Without a doubt part of its best season
the same season that also had "Who Shot Mr. Burns part 2" and "Summer of 4 foot 2".

I'm just going on the hypothetical, IF THEY WERE GOING TO HAVE ANOTHER ONE. Not arguing if they SHOULD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. Short answer: No lineup could make up for '99. Long answer:
I was somewhere north of Indianapolis in late July 1999, at the Deer Creek Amphitheatre, for a two-day run by Phish, the inheritors of the Grateful Dead traveling-hippie circus. The band was playing its second night, and word had come down the wire that Woodstock was burning. The band performed a good set -- I recall a particularly stellar "Theme from the Bottom" segueing into "Down With Disease" -- and the band's lead singer/guitarist then gave a little speech about how great the band's scene was, what a community atmosphere, love, peace, and so on. He ended it with "It's only when you get greedy that things go up in flames."

Phish encored that night with "Woodstock" by Crosby, Stills and Nash.

What it comes down to is, there is combination of quantity and quality of bands that would make Woodstock great again. In fact, a killer lineup like you suggest would only make matters worse. Because it wasn't truly the lineup that killed Woodstock. It was the $8 bottle of water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KenHodson Donating Member (220 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. You are right, that's why
you gotta bring some homegrown. I got a hydroponic chamber in my basement strictly for growing the wet stuff.
Look for my van, man, I'll hook you up. 7.25 a bottle. Tops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC