Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Math experts... have you seen this before?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
begin_within Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 11:41 PM
Original message
Math experts... have you seen this before?


e is the base of the natural logarithms
pi is the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter
i is the imaginary number equal to the square root of -1

Have you seen this equation before, and is it true?
Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KitchenWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not seen the equation
Edited on Tue Jun-19-07 11:46 PM by KitchenWitch
The answer my fancy calculator gives me is (-1,0)

Meaning there are two answers to the equation (it is, in essence, a quadratic)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChoralScholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Google Calc says so....
Edited on Tue Jun-19-07 11:46 PM by ChoralScholar
Google e^(pi*i)+1

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Random_Australian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. YES! That's the famous Euler's Formula! That's the most amazing bit of math!
Edited on Tue Jun-19-07 11:50 PM by Random_Australian
I LOVE that formula.

Seriously, the only thing that is more entertaining is the weierstrauss function, but I never use that one.

I do use Euler's formula all the damn time, though. It's so cool.

Edit: And the reason incoherent sinusoids form a single sinusoid of the same frequency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
begin_within Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Thanks... I never knew it had a name. What is it useful for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Random_Australian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Well, Euler's Formula is actually
e^i*x = cos (x) + i*sin (x)

And they just used the appropriate value of x.

It's useful because when I want to do something that involves a LOT of cosines, like what happens when a wave hits an aperture (light hits a hole, or wave in water hit a wall with a section missing) then instead of having to go through all those extremely tortous cosine and sine rules, you can actually just say "cos (x) is the real part of e^i*x " and work it out like that.

It's so good for those because often you have to integrate a function that changes rapidly.... inside the cosine function.

Which would be evil/impossible, but becomes simple.

We use electrical waves too, so anything that uses electricity needs this stuff too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
begin_within Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
triguy46 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
31. We need way more of this stuff on DU.
I'm not a mathematician, but I appreciate knowledge and concepts and ideas. This is great stuff. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Used it all the time in electrical engineering doing frequency diagrams
and other electrical wave stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. I can think of more entertaining things than the weierstrauss function.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr. Strange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. No you can't!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Random_Australian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Well, don't just leave us in suspense - tell us!
Yeah, there are probably more entertaining things than the weierstrauss function - I just happen to like the idea of a line without a slope. ;) (Putting it so normal people can read it)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. a line without a slope? Can you explain it more?
and in terms a "normal" (ie non-mathemetician) can understand? Calculating the slope of a line is one of the ways I get my data results so this caught me eye and curiousity...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Random_Australian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Well, if you want to know the slope of a line, what you do is take two points on the line,
and compute change in y/change in x.

For a better approximation to what the slope at a point is, you bring the points closer together.

The limit as you bring them together is the derivative - the slope at a point.

However, if you bring the two points closer together on the weierstrauss function, it does NOT get closer and closer to some value. It oscillates back and forth, and the closer you bring the points together, the faster it goes.

In other words, the limit does not exist.

In other words, it does not have a slope at any point.

In other words, it is a line without a slope. (Or should I say curve?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. In other words it is a continuous but nondifferentiable function
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Are the things you are thinking about of a carnal nature?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I was thinking more along the lines of the Nowhere Monotonic Continuous Function.
I'd say more but monotonic continuous function threads are not allowed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 02:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
19. (zoom)
over my head...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 04:48 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Not that difficult
It's just a polar to rectangular conversion.



You can locate a point in 2-d space by two methods: x/y coordinates (like latitude/longitude) OR by saying the point is so many units and rotated so many degrees.

When adding and subtracting, it's easier to work in rectangular coordinates.

When multiplying and dividing, it's easier to work with polar coordinates.

e^(i*x) = cos(x) + i*sin(x)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. Cartesian and polar coordinates are okay with me
It's when people begin sprouting obscure theorems named after obscure peple that my brain seeks nurishment elsewhere... :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. LOL
I enjoy math for what it can do as a tool, not as and end in itself.

In electrical engineering we use two dimensional space to represent both amplitude and phase of a signal. And it beats the hell out of solving a differential equation every time you want to analyze a circuit with reactive components (inductors and capacitors).

Richard Feynman once called Euler's formula "our jewel" and "the most remarkable formula in mathematics".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. phazor diagram
I'm having flashbacks now... oy, vey...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. which naturally leads into a discussion of Laplace transforms
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laplace_transform

Welcome back to sophomore electrical engineering.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. I was mechanical...
give me mass-spring-damper systems!

Actually, I did better in thermodynamics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Yep, the ME analog to RLC circuits
Back then they even made us sparkies take Thermo AND Heat Transfer. They wanted us to be well-rounded. Now, it's overly specialized IMO.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yes, indeedy! It was also voted the most elegant formula
I cant remember what magazine did it - Time magazine, maybe? Or the NYT? Back in 2005, maybe 2006, whoever it was had a list of the most elegant, or beautiful, equations.

That was the lead one, if memory serves.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
16. Used in electrical engineering and other fields
Edited on Wed Jun-20-07 08:33 PM by pokerfan
It's a phasor.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phasor_(electronics)

The complete form is:


Since we sparkies use i to represent current, j is used for the square root of -1.

And yes, the equation as shown is true.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 02:47 AM
Response to Original message
18. Euler's formula in wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler%27s_formula

Euler's formula, named after Leonhard Euler, is a mathematical formula in complex analysis that shows a deep relationship between the trigonometric functions and the complex exponential function. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler%27s_identity">Euler's identity, i.e. the formula referred to in the OP, is a special case of the Euler formula.)

Euler's formula states that, for any real number x,

e^(i*x) = cos(x) + i*sin(x)

where

e (roughly 2.71828) is the base of the natural logarithm

i is the imaginary unit (the square root of -1)

cos and sin are trigonometric functions.

* is the symbol used above for multiplication

^ is the symbol used above for exponentiation


The independent variable in a trigonometric function is expressed in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radian">radians. One radian is the angle subtended at the center of a circle by an arc of circumference that is equal in length to the radius of the circle, roughly 57.2958 degrees. Pi radians is equal to 180 degrees.

It turns out that the base of e for the exponential function, and the unit of one radian for trigonometric functions, are by far the best units for these functions; any other units would make formulas such as the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taylor_series">Taylor series expansions for these functions much more complicated.

I worked with these functions in advanced mathematics classes in college (such as advanced calculus, and mathematical methods for physics); I majored in math, and always liked math and was good with numbers and math since I was a kid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smedwed Donating Member (51 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. Euler
Euler was also the first mathematician to use the notation pi, e, and i/j.
Or so i seem to remember from maths history :)
So he was the first person to be able to write it as exactly that, which must have made him smile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr. Strange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. A Tercentenary Celebration
For all you Euler fans: this year is the tercentenary celebration of Euler.

Feel free to party, but please, don't drink and derive. (Oh, that was bad!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildhorses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
29. this thread is oddly fascinating and strangely arousing
or as paris would say: that's hot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. In a math nerdy kind of way....
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC