Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lost vs. 24 (spoilers)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 11:48 PM
Original message
Lost vs. 24 (spoilers)
'Lost' vs. '24': We're not going to wonder why the same line popped up in both shows. You are.

May 19, 2009, 07:15 PM | by Dan Snierson

Did anyone else have dialogue deja vu while watching 24's season finale last night? After Jack urged Tony not to kill the man who'd ordered the hit on Michelle, Tony showed him a belt of explosives and said, "I'm not going to kill him, Jack. You are." Less than a week earlier on Lost's season finale, en route to visit the mysterious Jacob, Locke told Ben, "I'm not going to kill Jacob, Ben. You are."

So, the question is begged: Which show used that line/twist more effectively? One could argue that the stakes were higher on 24, as our handcuffed hero was being forced to serve as a suicide bomber. (Tony's plan failed, of course.) On the other hand, the Lost scenario was more provocative, as we wondered why Locke (or a supernatural version of Locke) was making such a loaded request and whether Ben would actually choose to follow Locke's instructions (which he did, in that cryptic, eerie scene).

http://popwatch.ew.com/popwatch/2009/05/lost-vs-24-same.html

(yes, I did catch it..)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Lost did it better
The Lost one actually came true - and Ben did it out of choice - would not have been so for Jack. I watched both - and I gotta say to peeps that say 24 is a republican show - it's really not. The end with Jack dying, admitting he broke the law when he tortured people was a truly moving moment, and a damning one against those who still make the case that the torture was legal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Right. And the bad guys this season where the private armies
that Republicans admire so much. All those chickenhawks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Exactly - and Jack
starting off the season testifing before congress for his role in torturing people - another "OMG why are WE not doing this?" moment. 24 has had it's best seasons when it focuses on real issues facing the country - like Charles Logan (aka George Bush) from season 5 - this season was great too, but never quite reached the level of intensity provided by Charles and Martha Logan. Argh they better address this in Season 8 - more so than just one line from Aaron Pierce saying he doesn't want to talk about it.

It also helps when uber-conservative writer/producer joel surnow writes exactly zero episodes for the season. He's still a producer on the show, and imdb has him listed as writing some this season, but i look out for his name every time the opening credits air and i never saw his name as a writer this season thankfully. True, I could have been too trashed and missed it during an ep or two, but afaik he didn't write any this season. Who did write some good ones were David Fury (Lost, Buffy the Vampire Slayer) and Manny Coto (Odyssey 5), and Howard Gordon (The X-Files). Hope season 8 is as good as this one was at least - I won't even try to set the bar at the unbeatable (imo) season 5 level. (yes, i'm a huge tv nerd - but only good shows i swear! heheh)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I think that this season was as good as the first one
I think that the last one was the worst... perhaps season 2 was bad.

On occasions one scratches one's head and think: you cannot do this! Like ignoring the heavy guards of Marines in the White House that will never allow such an easy take over. Or an unsecured tunnel.

And as much as many in the country grumbling about how things are bad, it is hard to imagine so many traitors in high places. No matter what we think of Cheney and Bush and Rove, I doubt they would ever be a part of a massive attack on Americans.

And it is always amazes how Jack can spring back to action from being almost clinically dead. He has done it before and, again, in the season finale.

As for the writers: this has to have some commercial appeal and the terror around every corner message which found receptive audience shortly after 9/11 no longer holds. So they had to make Jack a kinder person. I think that what he said in one of the first episodes is important: we, as a society, has to decide whether we want to use torture to further our goals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
4. LOST, of course which is more real considering it's based on fantasy
where 24 is supposed to be more realistic but seems to get stupider every season. The mixing of torture and stem cells in every show cracks me up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
6. Uh, because it's a cliched line? Lost did it better
24 was predictable. Fox loves its double-cross storylines. See Prison Break for too many examples to list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 04:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC