Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Conviction tossed over jury not taking oath

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
JonLP24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 05:30 PM
Original message
Conviction tossed over jury not taking oath
ANN ARBOR, Mich. - A Michigan man sent to prison for 15 years is getting a new trial after the judge failed to do a routine procedure - ask the jury to take an oath.

Timothy Becktel was sentenced in 2008 for assault with intent to murder. But his appellate lawyer successfully argued that the verdict should be thrown out because the jury didn't swear to return an honest decision based on law and evidence.

The Michigan Court of Appeals said Friday it must erase the verdict to preserve the fairness and integrity of the judicial system.

Assistant prosecutor David King says his office might appeal to the Michigan Supreme Court. He says Becktel's trial attorney never objected to the lack of a jury oath.

http://www.azcentral.com/offbeat/articles/2010/03/05/20100305conviction-tossed-over-jury-oath05-ON.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lil Missy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. What a waste of taxpayer money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nomorenomore08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. The attorney didn't object? What a shitty excuse for a lawyer.
That, more than anything, is what stands out to me about this story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiddleFingerMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Fail.
.
#1. I think that the omission of what is almost certainly a mindless rote process
would go unnoticed by many, if not most.
.
#2. It's not the defense attorney's job to supervise, correct nor guide the Court.
.
#3. I might go all Cape Fear on my attorney if he blew away a perfectly good shot
at an appeal later on -- no matter WHAT the reason.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nomorenomore08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. You got me on point #3. I hadn't considered that.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC