Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is it acceptable for a solipsist to have multiple personality disorder, or would that be cheating?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 11:00 PM
Original message
Is it acceptable for a solipsist to have multiple personality disorder, or would that be cheating?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dimbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 02:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. Cheating implies that others have rules.
There are no others. Reductio ad absurdum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Where do you get "others" from in your claim that cheating implies that others have rules?
My concept of cheating is a violation of whatever rules are relevant in the context of using the word "cheating."

For example, suppose that a solipsist goes on a special weight-loss regimen. Can the solipsist violate the rules of the regimen to an unlimited extent while remaining on the regimen and without cheating? I think that in ordinary language we speak of three possibilities: being on the regimen and strictly adhering to it; being on the regimen and cheating; and being off the regimen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dimbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. You have a concept of cheating, I have a concept of cheating.
They are irrelevant. What counts is the solipsist's concept of cheating, which is IMHO likely to be very flexible and "self serving."

So flexible as to make the Ten Suggestions seem indulgent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
siligut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. In true Dissociative Identity Disorder, the denial of others is a given
That would mean solipsism is a protective mechanism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. As long as you don't give yourself any social diseases, I see no problem with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiddleFingerMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. As a true solipsist, I gave myself an antisocial disease once. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC