Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

China's Annual Glacial Loss Now Equals Flow Of Yellow River - AFP

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 03:09 PM
Original message
China's Annual Glacial Loss Now Equals Flow Of Yellow River - AFP
BEIJING (AFP) Aug 23, 2004 - "Global warming is causing China's highland glaciers, including those covering Mount Everest, to shrink by an amount equivalent to all the water in the Yellow River every year, state media said Monday. A staggering seven percent of the country's glaciers vanish annually under the sweltering sun, enough to fill its second-largest river to the brim, the Xinhua news agency reported.

Xinhua, quoting leading glacier expert Yan Tandong, said this has been going on for the past four decades.

This would seem to imply that the glaciers regain some of their losses during the cold months of the year, or there would be very little of them left by now. The issue is of particular concern to Tibet, home to nearly all the country's glaciers, and even Mount Everest has been found to be suffering, Xinhua reported.

A potential silver lining in the form of additional water for China's arid north and west has not materialized, according to the agency." Much of the melted glacier water vaporizes long before it reaches the country's drought-stricken farmers and again global warming is to blame, it reported."

EDIT

http://www.terradaily.com/2004/040823044406.zfd2auob.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PeaceForever Donating Member (229 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. No glaciers means no water, correct? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Or a lot less water.
Seasonal snows would still melt and flow downstream, but once they were gone, that would be it. Currently, steady ongoing glacial melt keeps rivers going through the summer after the temporary snowpack has melted.

This could very well not be the case by 2050 or so - the Ganges, the Amu Darya, the Bramaphutra, the Houghly, the Indus and many other S. Asian rivers might simply stop flowing in the summer and start up again during the fall or winter months - not an appealing scenario.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brokensymmetry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. And when the water stops...
the food production stops.

And with 2.6+ billion hungry people....nothing good is likely to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC