Either way, it sucks, but if we don't call it what it is, we have no basis for an argument.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depleted_uranium#Chemical_toxicity"Chemical toxicity
The chemical toxicity of depleted uranium is about a million times greater in vivo than its radiological hazard.<47> Health effects of DU are determined by factors such as the extent of exposure and whether it was internal or external. Three main pathways exist by which internalization of uranium may occur: inhalation, ingestion, and embedded fragments or shrapnel contamination. Properties such as phase (e.g. particulate or gaseous), oxidation state (e.g. metallic or ceramic), and the solubility of uranium and its compounds influence their absorption, distribution, translocation, elimination and the resulting toxicity. For example, metallic uranium is relatively non-toxic compared to hexavalent uranium(VI) uranyl compounds such as uranium trioxide.<48><49>
Uranium is pyrophoric when finely divided.<20> It will corrode under the influence of air and water producing insoluble uranium(IV) and soluble uranium (VI) salts. Soluble uranium salts are toxic. Uranium slowly accumulates in several organs, such as the liver, spleen, and kidneys. The World Health Organization has established a daily "tolerated intake" of soluble uranium salts for the general public of 0.5 µg/kg body weight, or 35 µg for a 70 kg adult.
While epidemiological studies on laboratory animals point to it as being an immunotoxin,<50> teratogen,<51><52> neurotoxic,<53> with carcinogenic and leukemogenic potential,<54> there has been no definite link between possible health effects in laboratory animals and humans. A 2005 report by epidemiologists concluded: "the human epidemiological evidence is consistent with increased risk of birth defects in offspring of persons exposed to DU."<55>"
http://www.mindfully.org/Nucs/DU-Medical-Effects-Mar99.htm"Exposure to the isotopes of uranium produces both chemical and toxic hazards to humans and have been studied extensively from the early data on uranium miners to the most recent controversy of depleted uranium in the Gulf War. Radioactive ore dust inhalation and its risk due to internal contamination with 238U, 234U, 230Th and 226Ra, have been well documented in the literature in studies from different parts of the world (55), with particular reference to the exposure to radon and radon daughters 213Po, 214Pb, and 214Po, formed in radon decay processes in mines (56). Three major areas of uranium-related medical concerns are the responsibility of the US Uranium Registry, funded by the Department of Energy and operated by the Hanford Environmental Health Foundation. The uranium registry, which was established about 20 years ago, defined three major uranium-related areas of registry: 1) survey of uranium facilities; 2) survey of epidemiological studies; and 3) human internal deposition of uranium and its decay products (57).
The US Transuranium Registry (USTR) was another program established in 1968 as the National Plutonium Registry. It conducted studies on human biodistribution of actinides (58). Most recent studies indicate significantly higher prevalence of malignant diseases in uranium workers (59), with increased mutations in underground miners (60) and connective tissue disease, including lupus erythematosus (61). Reproductive toxicity of uranium in a recent Chinese study includes chromosome aberrations in spermatogonia, causing DNA alterations in the spermatocytes and strand breakage in sperm (62). This has implications in the current controversy of depleted uranium and Desert Storm Syndrome (63) and Al-Eskan disease (64) as related to depleted uranium ammunition and armor."