Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Website appeal to fund family planning 'to cut CO2' (BBC)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 10:34 PM
Original message
Website appeal to fund family planning 'to cut CO2' (BBC)
Meeting the demand for family planning in poor nations is a cheap and effective way to cut CO2 emissions, a new website initiative claims.

The UK-based Optimum Population Trust says human activity is exacerbating global warming and higher population levels mean higher emissions.

It asks people to fund contraception, saying it is better value than wind turbines, solar power or hybrid cars.

Critics would argue the analysis is too simplistic, a BBC correspondent says.

The BBC's environment analyst Roger Harrabin says they could contend that reducing the number of people born in the US would make a big difference in achieving reductions in CO2 levels.
***
more: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8392193.stm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh but that's horrible, according to several people on DU, apparently.
The mere mention of overpopulation causes people here to lose their fucking minds. In short order, you will accused of hating the poor, being a proponent of eugenics, and wanting to impose draconian reproduction policies like that of China.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Breedernazis, meateaternazis, even incandescentlightbulbnazis
are all for saving the planet until it becomes their inconvenient truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. The money would be better spent funding family planning (and I don;t mean abstinence)
in the US. Given our citizens' disproportionate per capita output of CO2.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 05:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC