Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Puerto Rican Lawmakers Introduce New Status Bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU
 
newyorican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-24-05 06:31 PM
Original message
Puerto Rican Lawmakers Introduce New Status Bill
Full Title:Puerto Rican Lawmakers Introduce New Bill on Resolving Island's Status

SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico - Lawmakers who favor keeping Puerto Rico's status as a U.S. commonwealth submitted a bill Tuesday detailing a plan for resolving the island's relationship with the United States. The Popular Democratic Party submitted the bill a week after Gov. Anibal Acevedo Vila vetoed similar legislation introduced by the pro-statehood New Progressive Party.

Both bills provide for a referendum in which islanders would vote for or against a petition calling on the U.S. Congress and President George W. Bush to honor the results of another referendum on the U.S. Caribbean territory's status.

<snip>

Voters supporting statehood were defeated by a slim margin in previous nonbinding referendums in 1993 and 1998. Less than 5 percent voted for independence. The result has kept Puerto Rico's commonwealth intact - a situation that has been unchanged since 1952.

<snip>

The United States seized Puerto Rico from Spain in 1898. It's nearly 4 million people have been U.S. citizens since 1917. Islanders can serve in the U.S. military but are barred from voting for president, have no voting representation in U.S. Congress and pay no federal income taxes.

read more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-24-05 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. No one wants independence, they'd be screwed if they got it
The corruption would be over the top, and the US teat would dry up. The fight is between the statehood types and the status quo types. The downside of statehood is federal income tax, the official English Language debate....the upside is voting and maybe, just maybe, a bit more of the money now paid in PR taxes will make it to the public coffers and not get skimmed off.

I have a branch of the family down there; who knows what will happen if anything changes. I don't think independence is in the cards, no matter what.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC