Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

“Kansans to vote on gun ownership amendment”

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 03:24 PM
Original message
“Kansans to vote on gun ownership amendment”
“Kansans to vote on gun ownership amendment”
TOPEKA | Next year, Kansans will vote whether to change the state constitution to guarantee individual gun rights.

* * * * * * * * * * * *

A 1905 Kansas Supreme Court decision said that gun ownership is a collective, not an individual, right. The proposed amendment would give the right to each person.

* * * * * * * * * * * *

The new language would not affect the state’s ability to perform background checks before guns could be purchased, restrict the sale of some types of firearms or restrict certain people from owning firearms, he said.

* * * * * * * * * * * *

THE GUN AMENDMENT
If approved by Kansas voters, the measure would replace in the state constitution the phrase “the people have the right to bear arms for their defense and security” with “a person has the right to keep and bear arms for the defense of self, family, home and state, for lawful hunting and recreational use, and for any other lawful purpose.”

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. That sounds alright by me
Thanks for the heads-up! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's much better wording than my own State, Washington.
SECTION 24 RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS. The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself, or the state, shall not be impaired, but nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing individuals or corporations to organize, maintain or employ an armed body of men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Looks like someone read Heller before crafting that amendment.


Power to the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC