|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns |
derby378 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-21-09 04:22 PM Original message |
Lautenberg, Reed, Feinstein to introduce bill to mandate background checks at gun shows |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-21-09 04:25 PM Response to Original message |
1. Jeeze. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-21-09 04:28 PM Response to Original message |
2. Ten years and the loophole remains... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raskolnik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-21-09 05:00 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. What do you think the "loophole" is? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rl6214 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-21-09 05:04 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. there is NO gunshow loophole |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire_Medic_Dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 08:32 PM Response to Reply #2 |
42. A testament to the misinformation of the VPC. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoopla Phil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-21-09 04:35 PM Response to Original message |
3. So would this bill effectively ban ALL private sales? Or just the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-21-09 04:39 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. "Gun show" would be defined as an event where 50 or more firearms are offered for sale |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L0oniX (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-21-09 04:59 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Indeed ...it's a state thing. Florida has mandatory background checks at gun shows. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoopla Phil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-21-09 05:08 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. So how would this affect a C&R holder that gets a table at a funshow? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rl6214 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-21-09 05:12 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. A C & R is licensed to purchase |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoopla Phil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-21-09 05:15 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Incorrect. From the BATFE web site: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoopla Phil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-21-09 05:19 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Sorry, one of those quotes was the wrong one. Here it is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-21-09 05:48 PM Response to Reply #13 |
23. We're licensed to acquire and dispose of C&Rs through interstate commerce |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rl6214 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-21-09 05:57 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. this is what I was trying to say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-21-09 05:47 PM Response to Reply #11 |
22. C&R FFL holders ("crufflers") cannot use NICS, so we'd be shut out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoopla Phil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-21-09 05:22 PM Response to Reply #3 |
17. Here is an interesting tid bit from the BATFE web site that may exempt C&Rs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rl6214 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-21-09 05:59 PM Response to Reply #17 |
25. Again this is true but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoopla Phil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-21-09 06:39 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. That is correct. Buy and sell is OK. But don't make a business out of it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rl6214 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 05:19 PM Response to Reply #28 |
39. I have don that myself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-21-09 04:38 PM Response to Original message |
4. Two predictable unintended consequences of the proposed law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Endangered Specie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-23-09 01:17 AM Response to Reply #4 |
45. Or, people meeting at a gun show... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raskolnik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-21-09 05:03 PM Response to Original message |
8. Thank goodness. Someone is finally trying to put an end to the avalanche of crimes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rl6214 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-21-09 05:09 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. Do you have any statistics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raskolnik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-21-09 07:12 PM Response to Reply #12 |
32. ((I was being sarcastic)) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rl6214 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 05:20 PM Response to Reply #32 |
40. My bad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raskolnik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 08:35 PM Response to Reply #40 |
43. No worries |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
east texas lib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-21-09 06:59 PM Response to Reply #8 |
31. Good one! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-21-09 05:07 PM Response to Original message |
10. pfffttt... toothless legislation that i support 100%. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frebrd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-21-09 05:28 PM Response to Reply #10 |
19. Exactly! Let them get the "gun show loophole" obsession...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-21-09 05:21 PM Response to Original message |
16. Unconstitutional (for the fed).. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoopla Phil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-21-09 05:24 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Yep, and that is the PERVERTED Interstate Commerce Clause we currently have. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-21-09 05:38 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. cripes, it gets worse.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoopla Phil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-21-09 05:42 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. This is NOT a closing of a non existent "loop hole" It will regulate them out of existence!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-21-09 06:27 PM Response to Reply #16 |
26. Does that mean sex between consenting unmarried adults is interstate sex even though performed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-21-09 06:34 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Only if the guy stands in one state and reeeeaches his... n/t :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-21-09 06:39 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. But "A private sale between two residents is apparently now 'interstate' commerce." What if one or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-21-09 06:43 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. True, true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
virginia mountainman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-21-09 07:13 PM Response to Original message |
33. A few thoughts.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
biermeister (425 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-21-09 07:27 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. you said it brother! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-21-09 07:36 PM Response to Reply #33 |
36. 10X reply, facts that the gun-grabber minority on DU ignore and if they let Feinstein and the Scary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iktomiwicasa (942 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 06:54 PM Response to Reply #33 |
41. Never said better |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dashrif (353 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-21-09 07:24 PM Response to Original message |
34. Wow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
derby378 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
37. Introduced yesterday on the Senate floor as S.843 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
biermeister (425 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 04:50 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. here are the sponsor/cosponsors |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DonP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-23-09 05:02 PM Response to Reply #38 |
47. So much for Gillibrand's Gun Friendly credentials |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-23-09 06:46 PM Response to Reply #37 |
48. anyone have the text yet? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
derby378 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-24-09 10:51 AM Response to Reply #48 |
49. Here it is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
biermeister (425 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-24-09 11:57 AM Response to Reply #49 |
51. thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-24-09 12:11 PM Response to Reply #49 |
52. Yup, looks like a copy/paste. thx. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 10:48 PM Response to Original message |
44. Cho bought his guns legally. Both of them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Endangered Specie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-23-09 01:19 AM Response to Original message |
46. Ironic considering how the Columbine and V. Tech shooters obtained their guns: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taitertots (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-24-09 10:52 AM Response to Original message |
50. We could close the loophole |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 03:44 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC