Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WikiLeaks exposes true origins of Mexican cartels' weaponry (Hint: It's not due to the "mythical"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
Bold Lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 12:00 PM
Original message
WikiLeaks exposes true origins of Mexican cartels' weaponry (Hint: It's not due to the "mythical"
WikiLeaks exposes true origins of Mexican cartels' weaponry (Hint: It's not due to the "mythical" gun show loophole)

According to State Department cables, the Mexican drug cartels are getting their weaponry from an international operation, with the cartels getting military weapons through various government channels. Some of those weapons did, in fact, come from the United States, but they weren't the result of the "gun show loophole" straw-man purchases or any of the other individual criminal acts anti-gun groups would have you believe.

Large quantities of those US weapons -everything from rifles to machine guns, grenade launchers, explosives and ammunition, came from purchases by the government of Mexico from the United States. As the underpaid, undermanned and undermined soldiers of the Mexican army skipped out on the military to put their training to work for the cartels, they took their issued-arms with them.

http://www.buckeyefirearms.org/node/7668

______________________________________________________________________________

Seems to be a rash of truth coming out lately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Here's a good example.


This is the aftermath of a bust on a small cartel house in Mexico. At the bottom of the photo you'll see a pair of US milspec M4 rifles in the SBR configuration. You can't buy those at a gun shop. Nor can you buy the 40mm grenade launchers underslung on the M16s in the center of the photo, or the green and yellow M381 40mm high explosive grenades you see to their right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RSillsbee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
22. Don't you know every thing in that picture (including the dope)
is available at Wal Mart ?


Oh come on. do I really have to do this? :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken_Fish Donating Member (520 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. HK got caught dumping g36 rifles there. Obviously not from the US
as HK will not sell them here. However they have no compunction selling them to murders.. Ironic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. You cannot buy machine guns and grenades from US gun shops - but
Thousands of guns purchased in the US by Mexican gun runners are seized from Mexican crime scenes each year.

The Mexican government turned over the serial numbers to the ATF and they were bought in the US.

yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bold Lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. You may find the CBS report to be very informative
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken_Fish Donating Member (520 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. There are thousands of cars stolen from Phoenix there too. We gonna ban cars?
Mexico needs to clean up its own shit. Rights of US citizens have no bearing on their mess.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
one-eyed fat man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. You need to upgrade
Edited on Fri Feb-25-11 12:58 PM by one-eyed fat man
Maybe KV will lend you his...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Umm...ya know Wayne LaPierre is driving that - don't you?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Maine_Nurse Donating Member (688 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. And the far largest percentage of the traceable ones were not civilian sold weapons. Yup, Yup, Yup.
They were, in fact, government-authorized sales.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Not so - tens of thousands were traceable to US gun shops/shows
Edited on Fri Feb-25-11 02:41 PM by jpak
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LAGC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Let's pretend most of the guns in Mexico really did come from straw purchases from dealers.
What does that have to do with the "gun-show loophole?" You could ban all private sales but you still wouldn't be able to stop straw purchases.

Let's say gun owners agreed to compromise on a one-rifle-a-month limit.

What would we get in return? National CCW Reciprocity? Repeal of the NFA?

Lets put it all on the table, jpak. Let's wheel and deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. What you get in return are the rights of colleges & municipalities to ban guns in public places
Edited on Fri Feb-25-11 03:17 PM by jpak
ATF notification of mutiple gun sales

More ATF agents

and a ban on 30 round magazines

and close the gun show loophole

that's what you get

yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LAGC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. C'mon now... the whole point of compromise is "We give you something, you give us something."
How can you expect gun owners to meet you half-way if you're not willing play ball with us?

And you wonder why you can't get any gun control legislation passed at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I am a gun owner and I will not compromise with republic gun insanity
Edited on Fri Feb-25-11 03:45 PM by jpak
nope
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LAGC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Here's a prediction:
Edited on Fri Feb-25-11 03:47 PM by LAGC
Democrats will regain the majority AND we'll see more pro-gun legislation be passed.

Its not a Republican issue -- Democrats in rural areas can't win if they are anti-gun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rl6214 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. Yup, may very well have come from these republics
Panama (est. 1903)
Portugal (est. 5 October 1910)
Azerbaijan (est. 18 May 1918, lost independence to Soviet Russia on 28 April 1920), first democratic parliamentary republic in the Muslim world
Commonwealth of the Philippines (1935–1946)
Second Spanish Republic (de jure: 1931–1939) (de facto: 1931-1975)
Fourth French Republic (1946–1958)
Republic of the Philippines (1946, fully independent from the United States of America, inaugurated on 4 July 1946)
Albania (est. 1946)
Ireland (est. 1949)
India (est. 1950)
Fifth French Republic (since 1958)
Algeria (est. 1962)
Singapore (est. 1965)
Afghanistan (est. 1973)
Nepal (est. 2008)
Zimbabwe


YUP

YUP

YUP
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-11 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #16
33. really? I truly do find this very hard to believe
yup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. Those are things that side with gun control arguments...
Edited on Fri Feb-25-11 04:39 PM by OneTenthofOnePercent
Are you one of those guys that gets other people gifts that are actually bought for themselves? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maine_Nurse Donating Member (688 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Less than 12% of the traceable ones...
which is WAY less than 12% of the total ones submitted. Obviously, anything purchased at a gunshop is traceable, so the 88% of traceable weapons that didn't come from US gunshops may have come from authorized government transfers since those are also traceable through serial numbers from the manufacturers. The untraceable ones are likely from black market sales from south/central American countries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Glassunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. OMG! Where do you find these?
Edited on Fri Feb-25-11 03:56 PM by Glassunion
I lost count of the lies...

"More than 73,000 firearms have been seized in drug raids or recovered from the scenes of cartel gun battles in Mexico since December 2006."
The above statement could be true, but I cannot validate it.

"According to law enforcement officials, "90 percent of the weapons that could be traced were determined to have originated from various sources within the U.S."
The above statement is a lie. Flat out lie.

"Of the 73,000 illegal firearms seized in Mexico since December 2006, officials estimate that 90% originated in the U.S."
Again, a flat out lie.

Look at it like this... A little history on the myth of the 70%, 80% and 90% number the media tosses around from time to time.

The Mexican government recovers 29,000 guns from crime scenes. Out of all of those guns they only "submit" 11,000 guns to be traced. They only "submitted" less then half of the guns they recovered because the US BATFE would be unable to trace firearms that did not originate from the US. So if the Mexican government saw Russian, South Korean or Chinese markings and serial numbers, they did not submit them to the US for tracing because we would not have been able to trace them, as they would not have originated in the US.

So far if 29,000 firearms = 100% of all firearms recovered.
11,000 selected for tracing = 37.9% of all firearms recovered.

Out of those 11,000 firearms selected for tracing about to 6,000 were successfully traced and of those, 90% or 5,114 to be exact, according to testimony in Congress by William Hoover were found to have come from the U.S. This is where the 90% number mis-quoted in the media comes from.

So now we are down to 5,114 firearms that were recovered that have been traced to sources in the US.

So far if 29,000 firearms = 100% of all firearms recovered.
11,000 selected for tracing = 37.9% of all firearms recovered.
5,114 traced to US sources = 17.6% of all firearms recovered.

Now I would like to redirect you to http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/12/AR2010121202663.html?hpid=topnews&sid=ST2010121203267

In the article they discuss the originating sources in the US for "some" of the firearms that were traced. In the article they discuss the Top 12 retailers linked to firearms recovered in Mexico. The number #1 guy on the list with 4 stores had 115 firearm traces back to his 4 stores. According to the article the rest on the top 12 list had traces in the double digits... Not in the thousands.

You also need to keep in mind that a good portion of those 5,114 firearms did not come from the US civilian market. They were sold legitimately and shipped to the government of Mexico. These sales are approved by the U.S. government for use by the Mexican military service. The guns end up in Mexico that way. So all of the fully auto versions... They are not smuggled in across the river but wrapped up for sale legaly approved by the US Government.

What happens when more than Mexican 150,000 soldiers deserted in the past six years? What happens when many of them take their US manufactured firearms with them? How would this look on the trace data?

http://www.justice.gov/oig/reports/ATF/e1101.pdf (See Page 1 "Background" footnote #7) But I do recommend reading the entire DOJ evaluation of the ATF. It will answer many questions.

Also, how many of the firearms that originated in the US civilian market were intentionally allowed to enter the black market by the ATF?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoopla Phil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #18
28. WOW. Glad to see such intellectual DUer's here!!! Thank you! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beevul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. Nope. Sorry but NOPE>
"And the far largest percentage of the traceable ones were not civilian sold weapons."

To which YOU reply:

"Not so..."

Sorry but NOPE.

In a five year span there were 66,028 total trace requests, only 18,585 were successful­ly traced.

Just over 1/4 of all requests were traceable.

And ,less than a quarter of crime guns transferre­d to the Mexican Attorney General’s Office in 2008 were submitted to ATF for tracing.

http://www.justice.gov/oig/reports/ATF/e1101.pdf


Checkmate.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RSillsbee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
23. If no background checks are being done at gun shows
How are you tracking guns back to them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maine_Nurse Donating Member (688 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. All dealers at gunshows have to conduct background checks...
it is only private individuals who do not. In fact, private parties are prohibited from conducting background checks through NICS.
What is being "traced" are weapons from US manufacturers that are sold to gunshops/distributors for the civilian market. Background checks actually have nothing to do with their tracing. Manufacturers keep very detailed records of the disposition of their products, whether they go to retailers or government agencies/police/foreign governments, etc. The untraceable weapons come from manufacturers not in the United States (or most other regulated western countries). Most likely, non-serialized AK's/AR's etc which are manufactured by governments/companies either under license by the US government (the way Egypt manufactures their own M1 Abrams tanks) for their own use or as illegal copies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RSillsbee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. I am aware that FFLs must conduct background checks for every sale
regardless of venue. I was addressing the "Gunshow loophole" meme
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoopla Phil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. psychometry?
Psychometry is a psychic ability in which a person can sense or "read" the history of an object by touching it. Such a person can receive impressions from an object by holding it in his/her hands or, perhaps, touching it to the forehead. Such impressions can be perceived as images, sounds, smells, tastes - even emotions.
http://paranormal.about.com/cs/espinformation/a/aa063003.htm


Just a guess, but it seems about par for this course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoopla Phil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #11
27. So have you watched the CBS report? I know it's been posted several
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-11 02:25 AM
Response to Reply #11
31. He or she said 'largest percentage'. Reading comprehension for the win.
I love the response you post, with a link that shows a table laden with shit like 40mm grenades, along with what could be actual select-fire military M-16's.

Nice job there pal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoopla Phil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-11 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. yup
LMAO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. Doubtless the Mexican government says
"Well, good think we have tight gun laws here in Mexico! Otherwise it would be even worse!"





The Mexican government deliberately chose to create a economic vacuum by making gun purchases and gun ownership very difficult. They knew when they did it that nature abhors a vacuum and that guns would begin to flow into Mexico through illegal channels. They knew it then, and they know it now. Since nobody in power in Mexico is even considering, say, liberalizing gun laws there, they have to have made the decision that "this is the best possible course we can pursue".

Likewise, the US government deliberately chose to create an economic vacuum by making recreational drugs illegal to own or use. We knew when we did it that nature abhors a vacuum and that drugs would begin to flow into the US through illegal channels. In fact the CIA even facilitated cocaine shipments in the 80's. We knew it then, and we know it now. Since nobody in power in the US is even seriously considering liberalizing drug laws here, we have to have made the decision that "this is the best possible course of action we can pursue".



This may come as a surprise, but I want less violent deaths, too. Unlike guns, which are durable goods, I see the quickest way to achieve that goal is to legalize the consumable goods like drugs rather than try to eliminate a good (firearms) that have an indefinite shelf life. Since this would sharply reduce gang activity, the homicide and other violent crime rates would plummet... which would as a matter of proportion also reduce gun-related deaths.


I don't think you care too much about that, though. Your goal, I believe, is a society that is largely disarmed for its own good because you believe it is inherently good. Lowering the overall and gun-related homicide and other violent crime rate without changing the gun ownership rate would be a hollow victory for you because it would discredit your fundamental principal that disarmament is good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rl6214 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
25. They really didn't need to turn over the seriel numbers to the ATF
The ATF supplied the weapons in the first place, they already had the seriel numbers.

YUP

YUP

YUP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starboard Tack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. Oh boy, that's a relief!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC