Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Man Shot After Gun Accidentally Discharges"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
Pert_UK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:43 AM
Original message
"Man Shot After Gun Accidentally Discharges"
Hey, I guess we were all wrong. Guns ARE dangerous by themselves - after all, the article clearly indicates that the gun accidentally discharged (rather than that the gun was discharged accidentally)! Would it not have been more accurate to entitle the article, "Man Accidentally Shoots Self"? Or indeed, "Twat Accidentally Shoots Self"?

"DAYTON, Ohio -- A 22-year-old Dayton man was treated at Good Samaritan Hospital after police said he accidentally shot himself.

Officers said Jeffrey Wagner told them he was at a friend's house on Norman Avenue on Monday night when he was showing a friend his gun.

Wagner said he put the gun back in his waistband when it accidentally discharged, firing a bullet into his right leg."

http://www.whiotv.com/news/4047624/detail.html

He sure was a whole lot safer having armed himself, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. "put the gun back in his waistband"
None too bright, there...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Retired AF Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 05:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. Hmmmm
finger on trigger when placing into waist band?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 05:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Safety OFF nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Retired AF Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 05:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. safety on or not
always keep finger off the trigger, the biggest cause of "accidental" shootings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. And the hammer!
Remember you can fire a revolver by "fanning" the hammer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. It could be worse...
I read of a police officer recently who shot himself TWICE while reholstering with his finger on the trigger. After he shot himself the first time, he got really flustered and tried to jam the gun in the holster so he could attend to his leg wound. His finger was still on the trigger, and fired the gun again...

The proper reholstering technique, of course, is finger OFF the trigger and OUTSIDE THE TRIGGER GUARD when reholstering. And keep the gun pointed in a safe direction; it should be pointing at the floor when reholstering, not at you...

And stuffing a gun in your waistband is even worse...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Retired AF Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. If you fan a revolver without pulling the trigger
the hammer will stay in the locked position. The trigger has to be held back to fan it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. No modern revolver will fire that way
Unless it is very broken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Billy Ruffian Donating Member (672 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. getting a bit off topic
and not having *any* revolvers (1911 style, John Browning RULES ;-) )

would a SAA revolver or other 'cowboy' single action revolvers work this way?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. SA revolvers will not fire that way
Not any I've ever seen. Maybe very old ones, I don't know. I don't believe any gun maker would make something that can be fired without operating the trigger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. I believe that only works if the trigger is held to the rear...
Edited on Fri Jan-07-05 02:14 PM by benEzra
so even cowboy-style "fanning" does require a pull of the trigger (it's just a continuous pull). If the trigger is not depressed, the hammer will stay back just as if you had cocked the revolver with your thumb.

Oops--AF Dem beat me to it...sorry...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. Plus a round in the chamber and hammer cocked
:eyes:

I'll bet an Imperial pint of Guinness Stout there was alcohol involved.

:beer:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #11
24. "Here, hold my beer a minute..."
a phrase that is usually a bad omen...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
iverglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. ah, those lessons of history
"most of us on this side of the Pond don't care much - or really, at all - what subjects of The Crown think"

It's so sad that -- despite the best efforts of several people to teach you and your numerous ilk such simple lessons as they are (in both history and manners) -- you are still so mired in that 18th century.

I'm sure it's fascinating that you don't care what "subjects of The Crown" think. Is there some reason you're telling us this here and now?

Oh well, I guess you're just a better man than I am, Gunga Din, since (I assume) you know what you're talking about, and I don't have a clue.

Hmm. Kipling. The guy whose work a certain imperialist G.W.Bush and all his, er, constituents might have been well-advised to read before girding up and sallying off into a certain mountainous and notoriously ungovernable distant region of the earth?

The Man Who Would Be King indeed, eh?

HAHAHAHAHA!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
iverglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. congrats
"I meant every word of it."

The only aspect of that statement that interests me is the bizarreness of the claim to mean something that is meaningless.

But you go right ahead and babble on about "subjects of The Crown" and whatever opinions you might have about them, and perhaps if any of them happen by here they'll find your remarks more interesting than I did. When the remarks in question were composed, you were evidently speaking to/about some imaginary friends, for reasons known only to yourself; but far be it from me to suggest that this makes you look silly. Why, that would be rude.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pert_UK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 06:31 AM
Response to Reply #10
21. Heh heh heh.........
Never mind attacking someone's actual point of view - let's dismiss their ideas out of hand purely because they come from somewhere furrin.

Glad to see that TTJ is adopting his President's "fingers in the ears NA NA NA NA NA NA!" approach to issues that has served the US so well in recent international events......."most of us on this side of the Pond don't care much - or really, at all - what worshippers of Allah think...."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
8. Mechanical failure is possible....
Edited on Thu Jan-06-05 09:39 AM by aikoaiko
...but unlikely in most cases. I have to agree with the others that it sounds like his finger or something else (strap, part of clothing) pushed the trigger.

Sometimes people accidental discharges what I would call negligent discharge (operator error without intent on firing).





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skippythwndrdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
9. It appears to be a case of the dumbass.
I would surmise that said dumbass was likely not using a holster. I would also believe that either the finger of the previously mentioned dumbass was on the trigger, or the shirttail of the aforementioned dumbass got caught in the trigger-guard. The dumbass referenced supra learned a valuable lesson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. I'm glad the dumbass shot hisself
rather than the dog at his feet. Well, if he were in KY he woulda had a dog...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoeBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
14. Twat!?!
That must be English slang for something other than what I am familiar with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Yes, I thought Brits called people "twits"
FYI Pert - Twat in the USA is a vulgar term for female genitalia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pert_UK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 06:23 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. That's what it is in the UK too....however......
it's mainly used as an abusive term to refer to somebody who is, or who has done, something stupid.

It is nowhere near as strong as the "C" word (or even the "F" word) but you wouldn't want to use it in front of the vicar........

One might, for example, say, "I accidentally washed my jeans with a $50 bill in the pocket.....I'm such a twat!"

We hardly ever refer to a woman's fanjita/front bottom using the word "twat" in the UK, but that it is where it comes from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC