Jim Fetzer:How the Laws of Nature refute the lies of 911

[MrSammo1]

Jim Fetzer:How the Laws of Nature refute the lies of 911

http://www.youtube.com/w/?v=x-RjohsWGO4

[rman]

1. recommended viewing

[MrSammo1]

2. It's a good one!

The only thing I don't agree with Fetzer is what actually hit the Pentagon. I see no evidence that even a small jet hit it. I also see no physical proof that Flight 93 ever existed. Even if it was shot down......there'd be some evidence. (it would have caused a large fire)

[hack89]

3. What did hit the Pentagon in your opinion ..

and what evidence do you have to support it?

[MrSammo1]

4. I don't see any evidence......

that anything hit it.

Explosives were most likely planted during the renovation.

[LARED]

5. I watched about 10 minutes of it before

I started to feel ill. It's hard to stomach such blatant misrepresentation of facts and logic by a PhD knowing he provides an influential voice because of his CV.

He should be ashamed of himself.

[Laelth]

6. Hmm ...

Care to point to anything specific that you think is a misrepresentation?

I only had time to watch about 5 minutes this morning. The speaker is saying that the "official explanation" violates the laws of nature. I buy that. The "official explanation" is clearly a lie.

That's proven here: http://911review.com/articles/griffin/nyc1.html

-Laelth

[Monkey see Monkey Do]

7. You should hear him on the Zapruder film :)

(Actually his endorsement of the book Regicide - which to be slightly fair he did eventually retract - is probably funnier.)